How is none of this illegal 
I assume the partyvan havent been notified yet
I'll fucking do it. People here are too lazy and are shitting in their pants.
Topic: deleted - page 8. (Read 14587 times)
I assume the partyvan havent been notified yet
I'll fucking do it. People here are too lazy and are shitting in their pants.
Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.
uh......no
Because you "plan" to have more than 50% of the network. But this would stop the current miners from moving to your chain, would it not?
How is none of this illegal
I assume the partyvan havent been notified yet
Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.
The only way to stop it is to do what solidcoin did and have "tyrant nodes" where they need to sign the blocks to be valid but unfortunately that is a centralised solution.
Is that mean SolidCoin is not really as bad as people said ?
How is none of this illegal
I'd do Cameron Diaz.
You would have to be nerve dead from the neck down, or seriously hot for Tom Cruise to not do her. Of course, the day Cameron throws a pity bop horizontale to a broke down grumpy old bastard like me it will probably signal the end times on December 21.
A Cameron Diaz pity lay is my hedge against the Mayan Apocalypse. I'll come out ahead either way.
Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.
The only way to stop it is to do what solidcoin did and have "tyrant nodes" where they need to sign the blocks to be valid but unfortunately that is a centralised solution.
Is that mean SolidCoin is not really as bad as people said ?
It will be ironic if litecoin gets taken down and solidcoin is still going.
quick question: why ?
Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.
The only way to stop it is to do what solidcoin did and have "tyrant nodes" where they need to sign the blocks to be valid but unfortunately that is a centralised solution.
Couldn't this be easily stopped if there was a limit on the difference between two blockchain heights was put into effect? because as far as I know the litecoin client currently accepts the longest chain as the most valid one. So this would prevent something I would call "chain hopping" on the client.
Just wondering, if BTCX really were a girl, you think she'd be pretty?
There are no girls on the internet.
I'd do Cameron Diaz.
Id eat her sandwiches any day.
Just wondering, if BTCX really were a girl, you think she'd be pretty?
Awwwww thanks
Definitely a girl. Good looking too I guess.
I'd do Cameron Diaz.
You would have to be nerve dead from the neck down, or seriously hot for Tom Cruise to not do her. Of course, the day Cameron throws a pity bop horizontale to a broke down grumpy old bastard like me it will probably signal the end times on December 21.
I'd do Cameron Diaz.
Old proverb... when the elephants start to get frisky, the ants get the fuck out of Denver. Looks like anywhere but downtown LTCville is the place to be for the next several days. I expect a nice refreshing drop in the difficulty level once this has all sorted itself, and the pools will gulp down the resultant flood of hashes on the new thread.
The more things change the more they stay the same... now Rapist is the sock-puppet of choice to attack BTCX (although I remember when she was just our darling little BCX, without the pesky "T"). And yes, obviously she is pretty... if you know anything at all about California Girls, well, if you don't know your ignorance shall be your bliss.
The more things change the more they stay the same... now Rapist is the sock-puppet of choice to attack BTCX (although I remember when she was just our darling little BCX, without the pesky "T"). And yes, obviously she is pretty... if you know anything at all about California Girls, well, if you don't know your ignorance shall be your bliss.
It's not altchains without the drama.
Just wondering, if BTCX really were a girl, you think she'd be pretty?
Jump to: