kannst du es auch erklären? darum geht es. ich finde wenn man einen begriff benutzt sollte man auch in der lage sein ihn zu erklären.
man kann ganz leicht die masse beinflussen indem man eine "bösen" begriff benutzt welchen die meissten leute nicht richtig verstehen. ich finde das unfair! deshalb frage ich nach.
Wenn man in der Lage ist hier zu posten, solle man auch fähig sein, die Google suche zu benutzen! Ich gebe hier sicher keine Antwort welche schon 1000 mal im Netzt zu finden ist. Sorry!
An attacker that controls more than 50% of the network's computing power can, for the time that he is in control, exclude and modify the ordering of transactions. This allows him to:
Reverse transactions that he sends while he's in control
Prevent some or all transactions from gaining any confirmations
Prevent some or all other generators from getting any generations
The attacker can't:
Reverse other people's transactions
Prevent transactions from being sent at all (they'll show as 0/unconfirmed)
Change the number of coins generated per block
Create coins out of thin air
Send coins that never belonged to him
It's much more difficult to change historical blocks, and it becomes exponentially more difficult the further back you go. As above, changing historical blocks only allows you to exclude and change the ordering of transactions. It's impossible to change blocks created before the last checkpoint.
Since this attack doesn't permit all that much power over the network, it is expected that no one will attempt it. A profit-seeking person will always gain more by just following the rules, and even someone trying to destroy the system will probably find other attacks more attractive. However, if this attack is successfully executed, it will be difficult or impossible to "untangle" the mess created — any changes the attacker makes might become permanent.
)