Pages:
Author

Topic: Democracy or Dictator ship ? - page 6. (Read 2736 times)

hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
October 22, 2017, 12:35:33 PM
#98
Definitely democracy. It is true that corruption is present all around no matter the guvernamental program. The difference between dictatorship and democracy is that in democracy at least you can protest and scream out your opinion.
At least in theory. In reality we can look at recent events in Spain for example.
hero member
Activity: 1134
Merit: 500
October 22, 2017, 12:27:13 PM
#97
Definitely democracy. It is true that corruption is present all around no matter the guvernamental program. The difference between dictatorship and democracy is that in democracy at least you can protest and scream out your opinion.
member
Activity: 150
Merit: 12
October 22, 2017, 12:13:04 PM
#96
dictatorship because in dictatorship corruption come to very low level,law become strong while in democracy corruption become,separate laws for separate people its mean that for poor people have other law and for rich people have other law.in democracy rich become rich and poor becomes poor
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
October 22, 2017, 11:56:58 AM
#95
Previously, most of the people were illiterate or unskilled, thus dictatorship worked at that time. But today since more and more people are aware of their rights and there responsibilities, for today's world, democracy is the best option.
People aren't aware of anything, even today. Sure they can read and write, but they're just as ignorant as ever. University degrees are completely worthless these days too, because they get thrown around so easily that anybody can get one without having any real skills.. That's also why full democracy is terrible, because people don't know what they are doing and don't understand anything that is happening in the world. But thankfully, votes don't matter and people don't even get to vote on anything substantial. So democracy doesn't really exist, but allowing people to choose a "leader" at least gives them a fake sense of "freedom", so they pacified.
full member
Activity: 291
Merit: 119
October 22, 2017, 09:35:23 AM
#94
Previously, most of the people were illiterate or unskilled, thus dictatorship worked at that time. But today since more and more people are aware of their rights and there responsibilities, for today's world, democracy is the best option.
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 302
October 22, 2017, 09:08:50 AM
#93
need just 51% of the votes for a win.. Roll Eyes

Never the less it's still a win..DEMOCRACY..

Sometimes, it needs 30% or less votes to win an election (if the fight is triangular or quadrangular). The problem with this system is that a particular ethnic or religious group with 30% or 35% of the population can win the election with their demographic power, and then sideline the other groups. This is exactly how the problems started in multi-ethnic countries such as Sri Lanka (majority Sinhalese vs minority Tamils), Malaysia (Malays vs Chinese), and Afghanistan (Pashtuns vs Tajiks).

Just like what happened here in the Philippines. Duterte won with just 38% of the votes. And then his fanatics would scratch their heads and go "but WE the majority voted for him, stop being sore losers".   Grin

There really need to a better system for voting where people get represented regardless of their background and that majority of the voters actually liked who gets into office.
full member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 133
October 20, 2017, 01:33:36 PM
#92
I think China is good example Dictatorship with the certain degree of democracy we should find a way in other countries let's combine these two things to get the best solution for everyone.
The fact is that China has a very complicated system of governing the country, Who we are already leading there in the same Communist Party. But why not call such countries as Russia or North Korea, as well as Iran, which can really be countries under the dictator's yoke.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
October 20, 2017, 01:19:36 PM
#91
I think China is good example Dictatorship with the certain degree of democracy we should find a way in other countries let's combine these two things to get the best solution for everyone.
member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
October 20, 2017, 11:53:49 AM
#90
If we look at the history some countries got maximum development in Dictator ship while some got maximum development in democratic government. Every system has it's own flaws and benefits. What do you like ? if we talk about the welfare of general people.

It's about the motive of the ruler.
And Dictatorship or democracy is just a disguise.
No one can run a country without popular support from its citizens.
The parliamentary democratic system is so corrupt that no good person can rise to the top.
Democracy.because everyone has the right to speak and express there self you have freedom to do things you want as long you obey the law.while dictatorship has one ruller one policy.whatever the leaders said you have to follow...saw for me I go for democracy because thats my country is.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
October 20, 2017, 07:07:54 AM
#89
Democracy gives rights to people...

What? Are you trying to say that no matter who lives where, it is a democratic form of Government?

Siberia is a large country. It is something like two fifths again larger than the United States. Yet only about 13 or 14 million people live there, while about 330 million live in the States.

So, if you go to the Siberian wilds, all by yourself, and live off the land, hunting and "farming" as you want, that's a democracy? Are your rights something given to you by your democracy?

People have rights inherent in themselves. No democracy ever gives them rights.

Cool
I always found it weird that people insisted that humans had "human rights". Go ask a tornado if it cares about your rights and see how that works out. Human rights are just a made up concept created by humans. So yes, you can give yourself arbitrary rights if you're out in the wild on your own. It won't really mean anything though. Just like your rights won't mean anything if you mess with the wrong person.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
October 20, 2017, 07:02:16 AM
#88
Democracy gives rights to people...

What? Are you trying to say that no matter who lives where, it is a democratic form of Government?

Siberia is a large country. It is something like two fifths again larger than the United States. Yet only about 13 or 14 million people live there, while about 330 million live in the States.

So, if you go to the Siberian wilds, all by yourself, and live off the land, hunting and "farming" as you want, that's a democracy? Are your rights something given to you by your democracy?

People have rights inherent in themselves. No democracy ever gives them rights.

Cool
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 111
October 20, 2017, 05:59:52 AM
#87
Democracy gives rights to people, democracy gives a sense of freedom but in today's time when the world is being pushed over to darkness, Democracy is not what it should have been. Democracy is still being in power many don't get equal rights compared to some people. I think if this continues the day would be close when there would be no difference between democracy and dictatorship. Hope that day doesn't come.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
October 20, 2017, 05:00:58 AM
#86
Democracy also has a lot of disadvantages but they all fade away comparing to the greatest thing democracy brings - freedom.
Democracy doesn't bring freedom. Especially if you're in the minority.

Agree with that, recent conflicts around the world and specially in the EU confirm it
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
October 20, 2017, 04:56:57 AM
#85
Democracy also has a lot of disadvantages but they all fade away comparing to the greatest thing democracy brings - freedom.
Democracy doesn't bring freedom. Especially if you're in the minority.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
October 20, 2017, 04:54:42 AM
#84
Democracy also has a lot of disadvantages but they all fade away comparing to the greatest thing democracy brings - freedom.
hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
October 20, 2017, 04:51:51 AM
#83
If we look at the history some countries got maximum development in Dictator ship while some got maximum development in democratic government. Every system has it's own flaws and benefits. What do you like ? if we talk about the welfare of general people.
As long as it will help the country it won't matter what kind of leadership it will be.  The people and country matters the most don't you think.  It feels like those with dictatorship are countries who are more successful.  However,  there were no perfect system. It still has to do with the leader.
Which successful modern countries have a dictator..?
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
October 20, 2017, 04:01:03 AM
#82
If we look at the history some countries got maximum development in Dictator ship while some got maximum development in democratic government. Every system has it's own flaws and benefits. What do you like ? if we talk about the welfare of general people.
As long as it will help the country it won't matter what kind of leadership it will be.  The people and country matters the most don't you think.  It feels like those with dictatorship are countries who are more successful.  However,  there were no perfect system. It still has to do with the leader.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
October 20, 2017, 02:44:48 AM
#81
I stand for the democratic way of the country's development. However, if someone likes to live under the leadership of a dictator and their life suits, then why not?

For certain group of people, dictatorships suit more than democracy. Even in my country, I hope that a dictatorship replaces the democratic government in the future. Here the democracy is a farce. Those who increase their population always get the power and the smaller ethnic and racial groups remain powerless. And no one cares about the 2% of the population which actually pays income tax. All the politicians are only bothered about the remaining 98%, who never pay any taxes.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 102
October 20, 2017, 02:20:54 AM
#80
I stand for the democratic way of the country's development. However, if someone likes to live under the leadership of a dictator and their life suits, then why not?
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
October 20, 2017, 01:12:15 AM
#79
from the independent news paper ..
It's comment section from someone called AVIL

The EU might reduce the divorce bill for now but will claim elsewhere later on.  This is how you become creative and deceive people.  In the end the UK will pay what the EU demands or they will make you suffer.

I think the EU will suffer way way more than the UK Wink..

I fancy making new cars like 21st century cars made by the UK ..
I fancy making new planes 21st century ones made by the UK
and countries who want to join in making the new super planes ..

Lets just get one thing straight we BRITISH sit down and think the inventions we will make will
be shit hot and everyone will want one Wink..

I look at the shapes and i see better shapes  Grin..

MRS MAY you get us OUT NOW ..NO DEAL Angry Angry..
They are asking for way to much and i don't want a deal i want to show them how good we are at
building a 21ST CENTURY UK..

WE THE PUBLIC KNOW WE HAVE BEEN SLAVES FOR FAR TO LONG..

Food banks because you like lining lord twat faces pockets..

Explain how do people go to Europe if they need to go to food banks?..

Oh i know LONDON TWATS jump on a train for £100 while the rest go to food banks
Oh and beg people for 50P to make a phone call to try and get through to UNIVERSAL CREDIT..

Greece doing bad
Italy doing bad
france doing bad
Spain doing bad
Hungry and Poland want nothing to do with the EU .

And the rest besides germany and holland i don't even know who they are ..
No i do i was joking but not really known around the world..

I want out of the ERT European round table elite who have a hold on all our lives ..

LIKE TESCO telling me how to live and what to buy and what to use and all their products ..

You do understand business?..

5 phones on the markets or 50 phones on the markets..

The EU wants us to have 5 and they are their phones and nobody else's that we have to buy..
If 50 phones we will get 1 just as good if not better but way cheaper
More competition means cheaper ..

BUT the competition is gone but they make you think it's still there when it's not..
European round table have sowed all the business up..

If you notice the only ones that benefit are the major cities only the rest get swept under the carpet
like dust on the ground..

OH there is some shit holes sweep them under the carpet ALL OVER THE WORLD..

The EU is taking the competition away and then promote CAPITALISM ..
yes for them not for the little people..

Elizabeth Warren CRUSHES BIG Pharma Executive Lori Reilly "you ...
Video for Elizabeth warren crushes big pharma▶ 11:19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtStmOFO8qs
9 hours ago - Uploaded by Rolando Velasquez
Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren questions Pharma Executive Vice President for Policy Lori Reilly ..

THE USA home of CAPITALISM but is it really competition or capitalism for the few ^^^^^^
Watch video and you will see what happens in business ..

WE the planet are sick of greedy bastards ..

Want to sail the world        buy a rubber dinghy greedy fuckers Cheesy..



Pages:
Jump to: