Topic: Dev and team, show some care - page 2. (Read 441 times)
I suppose that finding the justice between bounty hunters and manager bounty of project is very difficulty because good projects which really bring income for bounty hunters is quite few, meanwhile bad and scam projects are a lot.
If dev and team are actually treating bounty hunters like this then it is bad. Everyone must learn to respect each one another in the business of cryptocurrencies. We are all working for the development of cryptocurrencies and blockchain in general. No one is not important be it dev, team and bounty hunters.
what is more unfortunate is that the payments given to bounty hunters are now too small without thinking of the efforts made by bounty hunters in promoting their project advertisements.
Worst, they really don't care. They didn't even try to limit the number of participants to a fixed amount so every bounty hunters stake is very low. If you voice out this problem, they shut you down with: "If you don't like it, leave". Gosh I just wish bounty hunters should quiting that bounty campaign all sudden to left them stave. I keep wondering why developers and teams will keep treating bounty hunters as trash. Maybe you forgot that you need bounty hunters as much as bounty hunters need you. Why act as if you don't need them when you actually need hunters. No one force you to start a campaign, why make promises when you cannot keep them. Some of you are even fond of saying it is a cheap work, if you actually know is a cheap work then gather your team of advisors, blockchain technologist, marketers, C.E.O, and start making post yourself and making tweet yourself. Stop looking down on bounty hunters, it is not as easy as you think. Using cheaters as an excuse is not acceptable, your job is to filter out cheaters using bm or doing it yourself.
if you may know what the project is, as far as I know, a good project considers bounty hunter and airdrop hunter to be part of the community, all projects that I know of like that, even Ethereum, are unfortunate if the project does not give respect to bounty hunters
what is more unfortunate is that the payments given to bounty hunters are now too small without thinking of the efforts made by bounty hunters in promoting their project advertisements.
indeed at this time there is no bounty campaign that can provide a large fee because no one is interested anymore in a cryptocurrency project so that many projects fail, many prefer to use the IEO method because that way can provide a lot of profit and there guarantee from the place of exchange.The guarantee that the project will move to another level once they've finished the IEO's are much clearer with teams who
really have decent fund. They can continue and show progress, while with every bounties, the chance of getting paid with decent amount are less as the developing teams are also not getting the fund that they've aiming.
Supply and demand. There is so little project with bounty today so more and more bounty campaigns become out of touch with reality since so many participants in their campaign. Wish the market gone back to stable again we dont have to deal with abuse from bounty campaigns.
what is more unfortunate is that the payments given to bounty hunters are now too small without thinking of the efforts made by bounty hunters in promoting their project advertisements.
indeed at this time there is no bounty campaign that can provide a large fee because no one is interested anymore in a cryptocurrency project so that many projects fail, many prefer to use the IEO method because that way can provide a lot of profit and there guarantee from the place of exchange.
Sometimes I keep wondering why bounty hunters are been treated worse as if project teams are giving them money for free but I can't find a good answer to this, all I can share with bounty hunters is to pick Projects more wisely and stay away from bounties that aren't transparency
what is more unfortunate is that the payments given to bounty hunters are now too small without thinking of the efforts made by bounty hunters in promoting their project advertisements.
I don't know why CEO's are underating bounty hunters, without bounty hunters promoting them with all their social media accounts, I don't think the project can go anywhere far, as we all know promotion is the key. They should all stop looking down in hunters and see the profession as a very important one.
Underrating comes after bounty hunters complete their work, such CEO only plans to use and dump bounty hunters, the only way to make them pay is using social media to spread what they did, this will harm their project in every way
Always remember that not all team will be bad, few good ones are among the bad ones, if you want to be treated fair in every bounties you want to join make sure the bounty project is been managed by popular bounty managers that takes bounty hunters very serious
I don't know why CEO's are underating bounty hunters, without bounty hunters promoting them with all their social media accounts, I don't think the project can go anywhere far, as we all know promotion is the key. They should all stop looking down in hunters and see the profession as a very important one.
Bounty hunters are still too passive and submissive. For example, recently I participated in a campaign with a quite big allocation of rewards which should run for 4 weeks. After a week the team decided to cancel it and lower the original allocation to 3,3% of the original promised amount. The logical and fair allocation would be 25% of the original one, but they did not receive enough push-back to change their decision. The campaign has had 100s of participants and only a few of them expressed their opposition to team's decision. No "scam accusation" thread on Bitcointalk and no real push-back outside of the bounty campaign's Telegram channel. Bounty hunters have to realize they have more power, especially when they come together and act as a whole.
Well, not all of them. Some might have been the way you say it. But there are some pretty good project teams out there who take their hunters seriously. It is even more obvious when the bounty is being managed by a good bounty manager.
As per the project teams that take bounty hunters as trash, they hardly do well. A good project team should understand that the bounty hunters are helping promote their project. If they think it’s cheap to do and don’t acknowledge the benefits that come with it, then they have a problem with their PR.
From my observation, most of those projects that have taken their bounty hunters seriously have gone on to prosper.
As per the project teams that take bounty hunters as trash, they hardly do well. A good project team should understand that the bounty hunters are helping promote their project. If they think it’s cheap to do and don’t acknowledge the benefits that come with it, then they have a problem with their PR.
From my observation, most of those projects that have taken their bounty hunters seriously have gone on to prosper.
No wonder so many new projects have fooled the bounty hunter, fraud done in various ways do not pay at all, cut the allocation even tokens in lock until there is no time limit, I personally in this case carefully choose bounty want to follow
Without bounty hunters or bounty participants, the project will go to waste. I don't think it is reasonable enough to treat those bounty hunters as trash as you've said. Respect is the key for both the teams and participants for the project to go smooth.
If there are BM's, devs and teams that are mistreating bounty hunters, you can easily spot where the project is leading. Whether to be just created for fund raising or unsucessful launched project.
If there are BM's, devs and teams that are mistreating bounty hunters, you can easily spot where the project is leading. Whether to be just created for fund raising or unsucessful launched project.
I don't want to be treated badly, some bounty managers are so rude that you won't pray to ever join any Campaign from such bounty managers again, bubbalex is special and bounty detective is good too, you make complains and they are always there to fix your problem
I can do few mistakes with few bounty projects but I will definitely start following strong bounty managers only, who loves their job and also cares about bounty hunters, one priority that bubbalex have is to make bounty hunters happy
CashbackLover you are right, Bubbalex is one of the good managers. I participated in few bounties where he
was manager and everything went fine. One of the managers who are easy to talk with, fast responses, and
he is always here when you need him.
For me bounty manager is important figure, project that worth will choose a good manager.
They create tokens from thin air and they have nothing to offer in real life after purchasing those tokens that they've made.
I think it’s only fair that they pay in bitcoin and weekly
There are some projects treating hunter like garbage.
That's really sad because they look down to hunters.
I can do few mistakes with few bounty projects but I will definitely start following strong bounty managers only, who loves their job and also cares about bounty hunters, one priority that bubbalex have is to make bounty hunters happy
Jump to: