Pages:
Author

Topic: Developer JGarzik reiterates, upgradable nature of bitcoin! Challenges Ethereum! - page 3. (Read 3287 times)

legendary
Activity: 1153
Merit: 1012
Yes, most people seem to forget that when criticizing bitcoin for a lack of features.

I hope they will improve privacy soon.

On the other hand, bitcoin should not be bloated with unnecessary features which could cause added security risks and reduce efficiency. From my point of view it would be a good idea to let some of the advanced features (like algorithmic contracts) simply "ride free" as an independent secondary layer (run by third parties) rather than making them integral part of Core. In that way a lot of risk can be mitigated, because problems on some advanced layer do not interfere with core functionality. Also Core developers can focus on the essential features. So I see use in systems like Mastercoin.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014
In Satoshi I Trust
yeah, and thats the reason why most of these systems will die or live in a niche (mastercooin, ehereum...)
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 502
The transaction format, the block format, script operations are all designed to be upgradeable. The bitcoin protocol is not locked in stone, as some claim.

BIP 16 (P2SH) demonstrated a "soft fork" network upgrade: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0016.mediawiki

BIP 34 demonstrated a majority-lock-in block format change, exercising a decentralized upgrade process: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0034.mediawiki

Bitcoin developers may let the ecosystem design interesting new features (hello, Ethereum!) and then incorporate them into bitcoin.

Bitcoin is a living, growing, changing thing.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2anxr1/reminder_bitcoin_protocol_designed_to_be/

http://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/2ao1be/jgarzik_says_they_can_just_hack_ethereum_into/
Pages:
Jump to: