I received a pm from t^2 via the digitalcoin forum asking me to return to the forum. The price of DGC has gone up recently.
But as with any good enterprise, the internal values must be right to succeed longterm. I don't see this to be the case when looking at DGC right now.
After the former developer screwed over his own community some changes were made to save the coin. The decision to go multi-algorithm was great, and technically well implemented. So, what's wrong? Lowering the number of coins created a second time was a measure driven by fear and shear panic. It disadvantages current and future miners and was done to protect early miners and main stakeholders.
Due to everything that happened (the Baritus clusterfuck & the CryptoAve failure, Bitcoin crashing, centralization issues, the scrypt mining crisis etc) DGC has lost a lot of its former userbase. Why would anyone choose DGC over any other alternative cryptocurrency or even Bitcoin, for that matter? What is it that distinguishes DGC from other coins, if it's not for its internal values (vision/mission/democratic approach)?
Transparency and real criticism are needed, not 20 more posts of the same few people cheering. Mainly, it will be close to impossible to regain credibility after changing the rules to the game while playing it. Only if you are willing to do that, would I be willing to come back, start from scratch, and support the project. Meanwhile, enjoy your shortterm success.
I didn't ask you to come back, I said "Would be nice to have you around again." But I guess that's semantics. In any case, my personal expression, which wasn't prompted or suggested by anyone else, still stands, but most of us have gotten over the past and are prepared to move forward. It would be nice to have some sound reasonable opinions regarding best practices going forward, but I don't think we'll be starting from scratch anytime soon.
I will clarify one thing though, we began discussing block reward changes in late August 2014. From day one the discussion was 100% transparent and open to the public. Polls were posted on multiple forums before the end of October. The topic was discussed at length and the hard fork happened in December. I would not classify the decision as one "driven by fear and shear panic". Nonetheless, does this sound familiar?:
Perhaps lowering the overall coins and making DGC a bit more scarce isn't the worst that could happen. I just don't know how future miners would think about it, perhaps thinking early adopters/miners had over-proportional advantages. Then again, early miners or adopters had a much greater risk...(
https://forum.digitalcoin.co/threads/1508-DigitalCoin-3-0-Proposal?p=25550&viewfull=1#post25550)
Good decisions, bad decisions, whatever. It's time to move forward and I look forward to reading more of your opinions.
TT