firstly the brussels thing was not an ISIS thing.
they guys involved did not grow up in the middle east. they were actually local to brussels and funded using the Euro.. exactly like the paris attack
im not sure if its anonymous pretending to be white haters by taking glory for hacks that never happened. or if its media trying to say that bitcoin is bad because terrorism was funded with bitcoin. even though it was actually funded with euro's..
sometimes i think people like the OP should research the news rather then spread it around and popularize it, even when admitting to not know the full story
I doubt many people actually understand or can figure out what is trying to be said by this article, I surely can't.
Anonymous isn't bad in my opinion, but they
seem to have lost some of their organization and meaning since a few years ago. I understand that most of them probably have good intentions, but Anonymous is basically anyone who can potentially hack donning the mask and joining their ranks. For example, if I am correct, there is a/are cell(s) that are against Donald Trump, but there are also cell(s) for Trump or supporting him in some manner.
I know they want to be Anonymous and impossible to defeat by arresting a single person (or group of people), but it seems like anyone can just jump in and say that Anonymous as a whole is for X or Y.
