One must be taken! Lolz I'm kidding
Well whatever is not supposed to be in the gambling or is not relevant should be trashed simple.!
Topic: Did mods stop locking gambling discussions? - page 2. (Read 272 times)
I personally don't not grab the point here, are you of the opinion that mods should keep locking the threads or they shouldn't?
One must be taken! Lolz I'm kidding
Well whatever is not supposed to be in the gambling or is not relevant should be trashed simple.!
One must be taken! Lolz I'm kidding
Well whatever is not supposed to be in the gambling or is not relevant should be trashed simple.!
Moderators make seasonal locking of threads if there are too many generic threads;
If every thread is locked at 200 pages, how are we gonna have mega threads. Or we don't need more mega threads, the ones available are okay;
Lock these threads, they'll open new ones;
Because, there's a campaign that doesn't pay posters in mega thread.
If every thread is locked at 200 pages, how are we gonna have mega threads. Or we don't need more mega threads, the ones available are okay;
Lock these threads, they'll open new ones;
Because, there's a campaign that doesn't pay posters in mega thread.
As far as i know mods only will do it (lock the thread and do other mod stuff) once its reported so they can manage it on their moderator's page. Without it it's rare for them to handle it, that's why they encourage people to report posts and thread for them to their job. It would be great if one of them respond here.
I remember maybe till a few weeks ago if a thread in the gambling discussion board was to hit a handful of pages in length, mods would lock it.
Now again this practice seems to have stopped and threads get a few hundreds of responses before they either naturally die down on their own or are locked by the OP.
I didn't fully agree with this practice as it was implemented but surely there's some potential to the idea.
I think it would be beneficial if whoever has perms to lock topics in that board should come to a consensus about what should be done. Maybe generic topics that aren't megathreads* should be locked after 200 responses let's say (which is higher than the previous lock limit). I think it'd be better if more people get to make topics instead of having the same generic things come up over and over again. Because apparently in the eyes of signature campaign managers to create a topic and to respond to one is the same but forum moderation should know better and encourage good etiquette.
* In my view we could call a topic a "megathread" if it's about an ongoing matter and it's common sense of all related discussion to happen there. For example "English football 24-25 season" etc.
Now again this practice seems to have stopped and threads get a few hundreds of responses before they either naturally die down on their own or are locked by the OP.
I didn't fully agree with this practice as it was implemented but surely there's some potential to the idea.
I think it would be beneficial if whoever has perms to lock topics in that board should come to a consensus about what should be done. Maybe generic topics that aren't megathreads* should be locked after 200 responses let's say (which is higher than the previous lock limit). I think it'd be better if more people get to make topics instead of having the same generic things come up over and over again. Because apparently in the eyes of signature campaign managers to create a topic and to respond to one is the same but forum moderation should know better and encourage good etiquette.
* In my view we could call a topic a "megathread" if it's about an ongoing matter and it's common sense of all related discussion to happen there. For example "English football 24-25 season" etc.
Jump to: