Topic: Differences between the developed countries and developing countires - page 6. (Read 1223 times)

You know, reality is pretty damn harsh sometimes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Im_8sI0QFQ
7:25 , people applauding a 2500 year-old invention  

Some trips in the poorest areas of your country or in some asian or African country would make you change your mind about how much access they have to technology.

The differences are enormous and it will take a decade before they at least learn about that stuff, probably a century before they can afford it. Even Eastern Europe lags well behind western Europe, with a lot of villagers still depending on horses for farming and transporting stuff, in other countries they can't have even those.


How the hell can one database provide you healthcare or security or education?
You need doctors, teachers and security personnel for that, and shady ICOs won't be able to do squat about that.

That is why the Crypto market is attracted by many Asians. In Asia there are many developing countries and I think the Crypto market has made many people have changed their lives spectacularly. I have witnessed a poor friend of mine joining in this market since 2016, now he has money to buy a home.

That case are happening to those country that governments does not care to their fellow countrymen, they are greedy and selfish to the power they have that's why any countries struggling to unemployment rate so now that developing country is hard to help because the problem has come root and long before it's fixed.

The main difference in my opinion should be quality of service and not really industrialization or buildings. It'd be lovely to live somewhere close to nature or in a village with great quality Healthcare, Security, Education, insurance, Food market,
I think this can be achieved with Blockchain/Cryptocurrency.


Cities are not just my thing. They are just too metallic and artificial for me.

a sad fact is Government persons/politicians of most developing countries are very rich. but the people of that country living in poverty or are medal class. it's all because of the corruption and lack of education. if people educate their kids they could help the country development.

and one more sad fact is when a new generation from developing country complete it's higher education and ready to start a new life. they'll start searching for jobs especially govt jobs. but they hesitate to start their own work. they think of getting big govt posts.  but when they don't get a job they start getting panic and involve in alcoholic

The difference will be very large. I believe that developing countries have insufficient international influence and their population efficiency is not very high. There are many people living in poverty.

Called developed means that the country is already above the developing economies, and has a per capita income of over $ 12,000. When looking at the numbers above, of course, people in developed countries have more than enough of standard of living. For example countries in Europe, most are developed countries.

Well it is clear after a lot of discussion here on the forum that what developed and developing countries are so we should proceed for further discussion. We are noticing that developing countries have to develop more and more but as well we are noticing that developed countries are still looking for development and they are moving towards new technological systems in order to obtain stability and to solve the problems they are still facing with.

I believe that the fundamental difference between a developed country and developing country is the process of transformation and the pace of growth. That's the reason why you will see the flow of money is move towards the developing countries as it has the ability to give more returns as compared to that of developed countries. The stagnant economy is the core reason behind the outflow of money from developed countries.

The biggest difference that I see between the countries that are developed and those that are still in the process of developing is the education system, in the countries that are developed you will see that the education system actually works and a person that is poor can progress in its society as long as he makes an effort in school and gets a good job, but in countries that are just developing the education system is terrible even when the government invest a lot of money in it and so people never get out of poverty for lack of education and opportunities.

Got a point. At the same time developed countries considered not only the industry but also the resources they have.they focused on how the economy will grow, well all countries wabt it. But in developed countries they consider a lot of factors rather than developing. Developing did not consider lot of things, they also focused on developing itself.

Same with my country too.I have lived here for almost 35 years but until now my country remains to be still developing.Majority of the politicians have promised to give lot of job opportunities so that people here will not think anymore of going to other countries to earn a living but until now only few of the politicians have keep their promises.My country is still in a developing country.

Great thing to know that, here in our country is considered country with low capital income or poor country because many people are jobless and many people don't have a regular job or even capital money that they can use for business, a company that are growing much here are those financial company who used to lend money.

Government should overspend during bad times and underspend during good times. When the economy heats up, the government should take in more that it lays out. This reduction in the money supply will cool the economy, reducing inflation. When we’re in a recession, the government should spend more than it takes in. This increase to the money supply will help the economy pick up again.

For me,the indicator of a developed country is the level and accessibility of education,compliance and implementation of laws,social protection,high level of income, good environment.It is difficult to draw parallels between a developed country and a developing one. In essence, a developing country wants all that a developed country already has.

Countries with very low income, that is, if per capita income is less than 785 dollars.
and there are groups of developed countries with high income, that is, if their per capita income exceeds 9,656 dollars.

The developed countries invented the technology the whole world has access nowadays, even the developing countries. It's acceptable they needed manpower a century or centuries ago, when these technologies weren't disponible yet. Once new technologies came in, they were shared with another countries too (machinery, vehicles, tools, internet, cellphones, computers, transgenic food, etc...). The whole world was benefited, including the poor countries. So why would they still need manpower like in the old times?

Also note that assistencialism nowadays is much stronger than times ago.

If they had followed the developed countries trend, they would be more wealthy nowadays. As you said: "you won't be able on the average wage to sustain 8 kids at the level you can do with 2." The same premise worths for developed and developing countries. This mass production developing countries keep doing isn't necessary anymore on the modern world... But they keep doing this.

As you said, countries start losing population AFTER they reach a developed status, that is Japan's case. New Zealand was established by British people, another situation; There are countries which part of their territory is uninhabitable, and it can also happen in regions inside a same country: Like drought areas, protected environmental areas... Instead of looking the general density of a country, to look the cities density would be wiser. They are overpopulated, precarious and keep increasing without planning, that is a characteristic of developing countries.

Unlike developed countries, economically developing countries are called countries with poorly developed economies, low economic potential, backward technology and technology, a non-progressive structure of industry and the economy as a whole, trying to overcome the barrier of backwardness, to reach the level of more developed countries.

DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
Low Unemployment Rate
Main Economic Activities in the Industrial and Services Sector
Low Population Growth Rate
The high level of education

DEVELOPING COUNTRY
Low per capita income
Still High Unemployment Rate
Economy Relying on Primary Sector
High Population Growth Rate
Low levels of health and education

It is a very good observation and trusts me, the rate things are going in this part of the world, and I really wonder how things would get to be in the long run. I believe the whole thing stems down from the leaders, and truth be told, most part of Africa lack very good leaders and because of this, things will always keep getting stalled most especially when it comes to development at large.

Hardly will you be able to find so much exception and a higher percentage are really not developed and even the developing ones which some people may still want to classify a bit as developed still have a lot lagging.