Topic: Differences between the developed countries and developing countires - page 9. (Read 1251 times)

I think you can deduced the difference from the word itself. Developed nations means they have molded into becoming one of the world superpower in terms of their financial growth and stability. While those developing nations are yet to achieved this because of several factors.


Unemployment is one success criteria for a nation to be called developed country. If your government can't provide a good living condition and employment for this populace, then it will be struggle for your country. Its very difficult to see nations growing if their own population chooses to work and go abroad to earn decent money to have a better standard of living. Governments like Singapore used to be a 3rd world or underdeveloped, but in the last 20 years they already transformed as one of the biggest economy in the world, so it can be done.

Too many difference about these thing. A developed country moves slower than the developing country, and mostly the developed country is a big and powerful country which makes them more powerful. In terms of market growth, the developed country is still on top while the developing country still having a hard time to grow economically.

You just rephrased what I said.

High army force? Seriously? Do the governments of the developing countries give those in army weed to survive or to compensate as their salary? Bring up more strong valid points, the ones you have are way too common.

Well, it's not necessary to judge only by working places. A developed country is characterized by the presence of different types of industry, its exports and so on

Employment rate and the minimum wage is the difference I mainly see between a developed and a developing country. High employment rate with a high minimum wage supports employees and in turn, returns huge tax for the government to work with. Employers caring enough for their employees often turn out to be productive and profit big, and it's just a chain reaction from there. Most of the time, developing countries are plagued with capitalists that don't care with the well-being of their employees, and no matter how many jobs a capitalist create, if the rate of wage remains stagnant and not compensating the employees well enough, it wouldn't mark any progress and would hinder the growth not only of the employees but also the economy as well.

We only give those countries regarded as developing countries hope by wanting to appreciate their effort in trying to get headway in their endeavors but the fact remains, there are only two categories and that is undeveloped and developed. To really know the difference between the two, just look at every working models in the developed world then think of the opposite that is what you find in the other set of countries and that is why you realize that aside for natural disasters, that one cannot control, every other disaster is present in those countries. That is where you see they are having civil wars, terrorist is occupying some portion of their countries, there is ethnic cleansing, you get to see election malpractices, incompetent leaders, corruption on a large scale, reliance mainly on loans to finance their budget then embezzle, no room for merit, focus on frivolities in place of facts, no service to the nation but pocket service, security is for the highest bidder, absolute reliance on foreign aid to having a good run in the year etc. How on earth can countries battling those challenges can be said to be developing?

Every country runs development in all fields of life with its resources. During the process, there are countries that can progress and some are still developing.

I think, Here are the brief differences between developed and developing countries;

DEVELOPED COUNTRIES

• High per capita income
• Low Unemployment Rate
• Main Economic Activities in the Industrial and Services Sector
• Low Population Growth Rate
• The high level of education

DEVELOPING COUNTRY

• Low per capita income
• Still High Unemployment Rate
• Economy Relying on Primary Sector
• High Population Growth Rate
• Low levels of health and education

In developed countries a lot of infrastructures had been put in places and functional eg accessible roads, well equipped hospitals and schools, affordable houses, regular electricity supply having all these structures will invariably create job opportunities meanwhile in developing countries most of this infrastructure are not available making life difficult to live and there is wipe spread of unemployment.

the first point of developed countries in the world is the strong culture they have and they will spread it to other countries
the second point of education systems in developed countries such as Finland is very different from developed countries
and the last point is a sense of nationalism

Yes you are right. But I am still finding it difficult to know where you are driving at. What exactly is the point? If you meant basically only the differences between the two well, we can only see the difference in the standard living of people. Cause in most underdeveloped countries, many citizens live and feed with less than $1 per day. This is quite awful being that their government have the resources to care for them but keep it for themselves.

Army resources is only denotes about the powerful nation but many developing countries have high army force but developed nation have very powerful army foces but as you said the African nation overloaded with much resources but they are not utilizing it because of their government so it again denotes the good and bad politician causes the difference from developed to developing nation.

I will briefly look at the differences with three different factors namely : Economic strength, political stability and education and  technical growth.
1. The economic strength also covers the ability of the government to attract employment to the citizen which empowers them out of the street and give them high standard of living, robust national economy due to exportation cumulating into strong and reliable currency.

2. Show me a country that is ridden in war and I will count their losses for you.

3. Education and technological growth goes together. This is the creative industry which off course helps the country and adds to the GDP either as terrorism, acquisition of best brains from other countries because of good working environment etc.


I don't think corruption can be a factor here because even in developed countries, you will find corruption being endemic in the midst of the people in government. To this extent, I think the difference here is that the developed countries abide to democracy and the law reigns. Some of the factors of such democracies are the rule of law and supremacy of the constitution. So they keep to the laws in the constitution so that, whoever contravenes the law is punished according to the same law. Hence, it is not that there are no corrupt politicians or people in developed countries but they also have the political will to excute judgements including death sentences not withstanding whose ox is gord.


Some times I think it is suppose to be the way which could indicate that the candidate is going in government for service having reached the pick of his/career endervour and not to amerse wealth because this is the situation in developing countries, their politicians see government offices as a means to clamp to wealthy status, steal money, acquire illegal properties etc.

Its common fucking sense. Employment doesn't do shit. In countries like India more people are employed but they are paid dog-shit. Does that make them a developed country? NO!

The main difference between the developing and developed countries is the power they have, especially in terms of arms. African country have a fuckload of resources, but they are underdeveloped. US has little to no resources yet they are over-developed. US can literally destroy countries if they want, but if they do,well its gonna be bad for them too, so that's why they aren't. So the US is more focused on ending African countries economically than going for a war.

I think corruption is also the biggest difference of developed and developing countries because politicians stole all the tax money of people so when the governments needs fund for creating new jobs then it will be not enough.But we need to remember that the developing nation's politicians were super rich than the developed nation's politicians so we need to pick the right leaders for the good future of the our country.

The income difference in a country, I think, is one of the things that is very obvious with developing countries. In relatively poor countries, you will see super rich people in their luxury cars and beggars. Gated / walled exclusive subdivisions with shanties just a block away. It's just extremes.

I am sure there are many differences between the two. If one country who is having strong economic bone and who is having stage of tax free states or at least tax exemption policies is something closed to the developed country. Not only that, we can also do the comparison according to how much Information Technology assets they have in their country. I mean if the country is having strong IT background then surely it is moving towards the future faster than the others and with the current requirement of the IT infra I am sure those countries can be called as far developed than the rest due to their capacity to work with full capacity. This way we can end up having many differences and I guess its vain to compare them as each country will slowly be a developed nation with the time as they go on adopting the techs.

It simply boils down to the very basic principle of economic laws, if a country which has a unstable or lack economic stability then it trickles down as how the society is portray. Just like what you have said, every year in your country lots of individual graduated but the government can't give them jobs and their only options is to go out of your country. So its obvious that the government lack the financial and economic growth needed to sustain that country. But if a country like China or Japan or even Germany whose GNP has successful increasing, there's no doubt that they can offer better employment opportunities to their people.

I don't think the education system is a reason because there are many developing countries producing lot of graduates but after they get graduated they move to an developed nation because where they can get more salary than in their country so again the same problem the unemployment stops the people from being contribute to their countries.

I assume when we speak about the developing countries then there is always problems with their education system and poor people are spreader all over the nation due to this reason. This puts the nation into a stressful development stage where there is no enough educated people who can make their contribution to the countries development and thus it slows down the process of development. Apart from this if education is not there then there is also no employment as you stated and thus no more income sources and no more tax filings. The tax is what government use to provide salaries to the government officials as well as to develop the national infrastructure. Now everything opposite to this one happens within the developed countries.

Yes the developed country means their citizen to have some employment provided or supported by the government but most of the third world countirs don't have any job fo their people so they left being in the poverty,but what are the other factors determines the developed and developing country?