Author

Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 134. (Read 3058907 times)

sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 278
it's time for DigiByte to skyrocket, we've been waiting too long and I hope this year can reach at least $ 1.
I don't think it will make $1 this year, next year it has a chance, markets move in cycles generally and actually, a lot of cryptos have taken the same path as DGB and are starting to break out a little now.
not gonna happen and asics are coming for dgb so even more coins will hit the market
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
it's time for DigiByte to skyrocket, we've been waiting too long and I hope this year can reach at least $ 1.
I don't think it will make $1 this year, next year it has a chance, markets move in cycles generally and actually, a lot of cryptos have taken the same path as DGB and are starting to break out a little now.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
https://dgbg.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool

1       asicminermarkettest    8,586,877 KH/s     23,717.126 dgbg/day


So, what do you guys think ?
Someone messing around for fun or the real thing ? Baikal x10 already mining ??



That was 10 days go, check now:

1      asicminermarkettest   265,176,616 KH/s   829,004.802 dgbg/day
Each algo can only mine little under 1 million coins per day max, currently today. So that pool is practically scoffing the lot in that instance!

Good news may be, nobody will be able to sell dgb at these prices if that keeps up!
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
https://dgbg.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool

1       asicminermarkettest    8,586,877 KH/s     23,717.126 dgbg/day


So, what do you guys think ?
Someone messing around for fun or the real thing ? Baikal x10 already mining ??



That was 10 days go, check now:

1      asicminermarkettest   265,176,616 KH/s   829,004.802 dgbg/day
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
it's time for DigiByte to skyrocket, we've been waiting too long and I hope this year can reach at least $ 1.
legendary
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
1) SHA256 - ASIC focused
2) Cryptonight - CPU and AMD GPUs
3) Equihash - Nvidia GPUs

Should read ...
1) SHA256 - ASIC focused
2) Cryptonight - CPU and AMD AND NVIDIA GPUs
3) Equihash - Nvidia GPUs

 Smiley

EDIT: I don't see any influence of ASICS yet.



need to keep 5
hard disk mining should be in the party
full member
Activity: 334
Merit: 101
I bought 1m of DGB!
Let's wait till it moons again ! Feel great to be a crypto millionaire!

At least the dumping of DBG seems to be over now and also DBG has a tendency to recover very quickly . I believe in good altcoin market conditions we can see it moving to 1bln marketcap over 6-12 months
sr. member
Activity: 323
Merit: 259
I bought 1m of DGB!
Let's wait till it moons again ! Feel great to be a crypto millionaire!
member
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
1) SHA256 - ASIC focused
2) Cryptonight - CPU and AMD GPUs
3) Equihash - Nvidia GPUs

Should read ...
1) SHA256 - ASIC focused
2) Cryptonight - CPU and AMD AND NVIDIA GPUs
3) Equihash - Nvidia GPUs

 Smiley

EDIT: I don't see any influence of ASICS yet.



Most of them will arrive in late november/december. I've noticed a big fluctuation on Skein last week, it reduced the amount I'm used to mine by 30% for a couple of days.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1014
anybody know why this DGB always still go down ?
few month ago Iam bought DGB on price 1200 Satoshi but on this day price DGB just 124 Satoshi.
what can I do for my DGB ? Cut Loss or still holding on ?

Never sell on a low. I kept holding DGB when it dropped from 60 to 17 sat and was a very happy camper when I sold a lot at 2000. Be patient.
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 262
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live
anybody know why this DGB always still go down ?
few month ago Iam bought DGB on price 1200 Satoshi but on this day price DGB just 124 Satoshi.
what can I do for my DGB ? Cut Loss or still holding on ?
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
1) SHA256 - ASIC focused
2) Cryptonight - CPU and AMD GPUs
3) Equihash - Nvidia GPUs

Should read ...
1) SHA256 - ASIC focused
2) Cryptonight - CPU and AMD AND NVIDIA GPUs
3) Equihash - Nvidia GPUs

 Smiley

EDIT: I don't see any influence of ASICS yet.

legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
DigiByte is currently 60% ASIC dominated and 40% normal hardware friendly. Although I understand people’s resentment of hardware technology development and the centralizing effect, these are real industries with real growth potential already stimulating this and the fiat economy outside. They help to make DGB more secure because of their efficiency and costs involved necessary to compete with them. The DGB mined by people armed with ASIC miners have real costs associated with their rewards. If all the BTC mining suddenly switched to DGB, they could only bag 20% of the DGB available, same if all the LTC miners switched to mining DGB again another 20%. The fact that we can fend off total ASIC offensive is already a major advantage. At any time in the future we could switch to an algo that you could only mine with a verified DGB ID, purely for distribution purposes at that time perhaps. That’s just an idea, nothing in concrete I know about. Anyway, as long as DGB maintains a comparable ratio of ASIC and non ASIC mining I don’t see any real need for concern now. Possibly removing an algo like Qubit now might even be damaging and weaken overall security of DigiByte?

Aside from Qubit, Myriad-Groestl and Skein are covered by Baikal X10. So, all algos are ASIC dominated right now.
WoW! This is an ASIC practically being sold as a DigiByte miner! That is pretty important and a major driving force for DigiByte progression, I’d guess. I agree it threatens decentralization though so at least one algo will need swapping out very soon!
what do you think sha or scrypt?  Wink

I think DGB doesn't need 5 algos. In my opinion, 3 algos, SHA256, cryptonight and equihash would be perfect for DGB if the goal is equal distribution of mining opportunity. That is:

1) SHA256 - ASIC focused
2) Cryptonight - CPU and AMD GPUs
3) Equihash - Nvidia GPUs

Distribution is obviously important but security is still a heavy consideration too and undoubtedly ASICs have their part to play in this. I think many of our ASIC miners are currently still individuals or small enterprise and contribute positively to the DigiByte ecosystem.
Personally, I’m thinking it would be better, when choosing the replacement algos to be mined on normal hardware, that clear instruction on how to get up and mining on it was given to the community at this time, hopefully reducing the time for organised miners to make  a real killing here. I’m also thinking, It’s fairly likely that at least one algo will need swapping out regularly as the efficiency drive, possibly moves these into ASIC development too.
Eventually we may have to accept total ASIC dominance of the market because after all, this is technology and technology advances so what then becomes important is, how available and affordable is the technology to everyone?  Always have it in the back of my mind that one day, one of these algos will be used like a universal payment system.
But I don’t think DigiByte should reduce to only three algorithms and I don’t really believe the three you have suggested would really offer better distribution either at this time and I’m pretty certain security wouldn’t improve.
Anyway, looking forward to seeing what does happen here.
member
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
DigiByte is currently 60% ASIC dominated and 40% normal hardware friendly. Although I understand people’s resentment of hardware technology development and the centralizing effect, these are real industries with real growth potential already stimulating this and the fiat economy outside. They help to make DGB more secure because of their efficiency and costs involved necessary to compete with them. The DGB mined by people armed with ASIC miners have real costs associated with their rewards. If all the BTC mining suddenly switched to DGB, they could only bag 20% of the DGB available, same if all the LTC miners switched to mining DGB again another 20%. The fact that we can fend off total ASIC offensive is already a major advantage. At any time in the future we could switch to an algo that you could only mine with a verified DGB ID, purely for distribution purposes at that time perhaps. That’s just an idea, nothing in concrete I know about. Anyway, as long as DGB maintains a comparable ratio of ASIC and non ASIC mining I don’t see any real need for concern now. Possibly removing an algo like Qubit now might even be damaging and weaken overall security of DigiByte?

Aside from Qubit, Myriad-Groestl and Skein are covered by Baikal X10. So, all algos are ASIC dominated right now.
WoW! This is an ASIC practically being sold as a DigiByte miner! That is pretty important and a major driving force for DigiByte progression, I’d guess. I agree it threatens decentralization though so at least one algo will need swapping out very soon!
what do you think sha or scrypt?  Wink

I think DGB doesn't need 5 algos. In my opinion, 3 algos, SHA256, cryptonight and equihash would be perfect for DGB if the goal is equal distribution of mining opportunity. That is:

1) SHA256 - ASIC focused
2) Cryptonight - CPU and AMD GPUs
3) Equihash - Nvidia GPUs
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
DigiByte is currently 60% ASIC dominated and 40% normal hardware friendly. Although I understand people’s resentment of hardware technology development and the centralizing effect, these are real industries with real growth potential already stimulating this and the fiat economy outside. They help to make DGB more secure because of their efficiency and costs involved necessary to compete with them. The DGB mined by people armed with ASIC miners have real costs associated with their rewards. If all the BTC mining suddenly switched to DGB, they could only bag 20% of the DGB available, same if all the LTC miners switched to mining DGB again another 20%. The fact that we can fend off total ASIC offensive is already a major advantage. At any time in the future we could switch to an algo that you could only mine with a verified DGB ID, purely for distribution purposes at that time perhaps. That’s just an idea, nothing in concrete I know about. Anyway, as long as DGB maintains a comparable ratio of ASIC and non ASIC mining I don’t see any real need for concern now. Possibly removing an algo like Qubit now might even be damaging and weaken overall security of DigiByte?

Aside from Qubit, Myriad-Groestl and Skein are covered by Baikal X10. So, all algos are ASIC dominated right now.
WoW! This is an ASIC practically being sold as a DigiByte miner! That is pretty important and a major driving force for DigiByte progression, I’d guess. I agree it threatens decentralization though so at least one algo will need swapping out very soon!
what do you think sha or scrypt?  Wink
member
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
DigiByte is currently 60% ASIC dominated and 40% normal hardware friendly. Although I understand people’s resentment of hardware technology development and the centralizing effect, these are real industries with real growth potential already stimulating this and the fiat economy outside. They help to make DGB more secure because of their efficiency and costs involved necessary to compete with them. The DGB mined by people armed with ASIC miners have real costs associated with their rewards. If all the BTC mining suddenly switched to DGB, they could only bag 20% of the DGB available, same if all the LTC miners switched to mining DGB again another 20%. The fact that we can fend off total ASIC offensive is already a major advantage. At any time in the future we could switch to an algo that you could only mine with a verified DGB ID, purely for distribution purposes at that time perhaps. That’s just an idea, nothing in concrete I know about. Anyway, as long as DGB maintains a comparable ratio of ASIC and non ASIC mining I don’t see any real need for concern now. Possibly removing an algo like Qubit now might even be damaging and weaken overall security of DigiByte?

Aside from Qubit, Myriad-Groestl and Skein are covered by Baikal X10. So, all algos are ASIC dominated right now.
full member
Activity: 334
Merit: 101
i've been holding DGB. Waiting for the price to go out. Roll Eyes

Indeed people should not panic. Most of the altcoins are very much down since June due to the general market trend. It's not just DGB or about DBG. We have to wait for better days in the altcoin market, if then after we still see still DGB down then only then it will be a point of concern, but for now the market of criptos is in crisis except the few + BTC
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
i've been holding DGB. Waiting for the price to go out. Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
DigiByte is currently 60% ASIC dominated and 40% normal hardware friendly. Although I understand people’s resentment of hardware technology development and the centralizing effect, these are real industries with real growth potential already stimulating this and the fiat economy outside. They help to make DGB more secure because of their efficiency and costs involved necessary to compete with them. The DGB mined by people armed with ASIC miners have real costs associated with their rewards. If all the BTC mining suddenly switched to DGB, they could only bag 20% of the DGB available, same if all the LTC miners switched to mining DGB again another 20%. The fact that we can fend off total ASIC offensive is already a major advantage. At any time in the future we could switch to an algo that you could only mine with a verified DGB ID, purely for distribution purposes at that time perhaps. That’s just an idea, nothing in concrete I know about. Anyway, as long as DGB maintains a comparable ratio of ASIC and non ASIC mining I don’t see any real need for concern now. Possibly removing an algo like Qubit now might even be damaging and weaken overall security of DigiByte?
legendary
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1003
actually for me i prefer dgb price stay low for months because i'm mining with autoexchange
and if it's low means more coins for me  Grin

about the algorithm discussion i agree with people who propose  dagger or cryptonight  for cpu/gpu   if you ask me go for cryptonight because it still can be cpu mined and it use less power then ether mining

if we chose something it must be an algorithm what use less power, dgb is green for the planet lol

and i agree also to put 1 algorithm  with hard drive mining , i tested burstcoin   it s a great idea, it s use not much power

and if we could do 5 algorithm you can also do 6 right ?

if you ask me dgb is great  , fast and cheap  could be used in stores

poloniex should add  dgb / usd  trading
stores how accept bitcoins, could be asked to accept  dgb , way faster and cheaper

than more poeple will know digibyte and it will grow faster

could also try to ask some big stores or fast food  like macdonalds or so to accept digibyte
Jump to: