Personally, I was just trying to be helpful by suggesting a solution that might make those who are concerned about the remaining coins a little less vocal.
You have been good to your word so far, my apologies if I caused offense.
No, you are OK giving suggestions, but it's the chatboxes that are calling me a scammer already that are irritating. I haven't given anyone a reason to doubt my words, and have proven I understand how to handle a chain, but already reading calls for ostracization just because of what has happened to people in the past. The way I see it there are two options:
1. Nothing changes and I continue to stand by my word of not staking or spending the coins on anything other than development for the community.
2. If you guys want the remaining coins destroyed (the opposite of their point and what I've said I would do), I will destroy them, but you will have to find a new developer or team to take the coin over. I am not raising funds and am not made of money.
The leftover coins are the budget we have to continue to move forward and entice others to want to help by paying them for their time and giving them a stake in the coin. There was no ICO, so I have no outside funds to use other than my own pockets which is not fair to ask me to dip into to make you guys money.
Choose wisely.
I'm inclined to support continuing the original plan.
The fact that there was no ICO and nobody has invested any money to date is a valid point.