Discussion about post quality for PRIMEDICE signature campaign. - page 3.

MICRO

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1037

CEO @ Stake.com and Primedice.com

Quote from: rohnearner on July 19, 2014, 04:13:52 PM

Quote from: Cryptopher on July 19, 2014, 03:48:23 PM

Thanks for spending the time to analyse, compile and deliver this feedback, MICRO. You've conducted a nice peer audit, flagging up some questionable participants within the PrimeDice programme.

As hilariousandco has offered, I'm also happy to chip in with some of the analysis. Perhaps if a standard for analysing post quality is defined then we can review quality in a consistent manner. However if you're happy to continue this process alone then that is fair enough.

PS. Thanks for the personal feedback

He has done it all already , also if you are offering some assistance you can help him next time if he does that , or you can go through the profiles again to make sure his ratings are fine , but let me tell you he's not gonna like it if you dispute his judgement , personally I won't like it if someone does that to me.

No , no . Actually i would rly like to get more opinions on this . And if u think my judgement is wrong i would be more than happy to hear it. As i told many times, more opinions we get , better look on it we have.

So i would love to see more people involved in this next time.

jdebunt

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1010

Oh I so love how you label me as SPAM

you really have no idea....

All the articles I post actually contribute to the topics they are posted in.

There no such thing as BEGGING for donations, there is simply a donaiton address in every article.

But whatever, it was a waste of time to join this signature campaign anyway

lynn_402

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 253

Quote from: roslinpl on July 19, 2014, 06:26:36 PM

Quote from: MICRO on July 18, 2014, 05:53:39 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Thank you as I had seen many members spamming this sig campaign and wanted action taken against them, they dont post much but there posts are uselsess posts.

Never mind I found your addy

Feel free to correct me on any profile if u think im not correct. Same goes for everybody who wants to help.

So maybe lets discuss about the quality of your posts Micro.
Checked last of your posts and most of them are on this thread or PD thread or thread about paid sig campaigns. How come you think this is constructive?

Regards.

♥BTC

It's Stunna's role to be the judge of that, and since he tipped him 0.2 BTC, it's safe to assume he considers him to be a constructive user Wink

Cryptopher

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 1008

Keep it dense, yeah?

Quote from: roslinpl on July 19, 2014, 06:26:36 PM

Quote from: MICRO on July 18, 2014, 05:53:39 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Thank you as I had seen many members spamming this sig campaign and wanted action taken against them, they dont post much but there posts are uselsess posts.

Never mind I found your addy

Feel free to correct me on any profile if u think im not correct. Same goes for everybody who wants to help.

So maybe lets discuss about the quality of your posts Micro.
Checked last of your posts and most of them are on this thread or PD thread. How come you think this is constructive?

MICRO moderates on PrimeDice, therefore it is unsurprising to see him so active within the PrimeDice threads.

Furthermore posts made within that thread can be constructive, he is often very helpful in there.

And finally, who is to say that he isn't deducting some of his posts in those threads before he reports them to Stunna? He did state that he deducts 50-55 (I can't confirm that).

roslinpl

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1199

Quote from: MICRO on July 18, 2014, 05:53:39 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Thank you as I had seen many members spamming this sig campaign and wanted action taken against them, they dont post much but there posts are uselsess posts.

Never mind I found your addy

Feel free to correct me on any profile if u think im not correct. Same goes for everybody who wants to help.

So maybe lets discuss about the quality of your posts Micro.
Checked last of your posts and most of them are on this thread or PD thread or thread about paid sig campaigns. How come you think this is constructive?

Regards.

♥BTC

Cryptopher

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 1008

Keep it dense, yeah?

Quote from: rohnearner on July 19, 2014, 04:35:53 PM

Quote from: Cryptopher on July 19, 2014, 04:23:47 PM

Quote from: rohnearner on July 19, 2014, 04:13:52 PM

Quote from: Cryptopher on July 19, 2014, 03:48:23 PM

Thanks for spending the time to analyse, compile and deliver this feedback, MICRO. You've conducted a nice peer audit, flagging up some questionable participants within the PrimeDice programme.

As hilariousandco has offered, I'm also happy to chip in with some of the analysis. Perhaps if a standard for analysing post quality is defined then we can review quality in a consistent manner. However if you're happy to continue this process alone then that is fair enough.

PS. Thanks for the personal feedback

He has done it all already , also if you are offering some assistance you can help him next time if he does that , or you can go through the profiles again to make sure his ratings are fine , but let me tell you he's not gonna like it if you dispute his judgement , personally I won't like it if someone does that to me.

Woah relax, I wasn't talking about going over his existing analysis. Also if you read my whole post you would see that I was clearly referring to the next audit on post quality given that I thanked him for carrying out this particular audit and then thanked him for the feedback he provided regarding my post quality.

My intention is to help divide the workload the next time around, should he require it. 10 hours is a long time to spend, and that timeframe can change as the number of participants fluctuate and post more.

One way of getting a quick glance at indicators is comparing the number of posts in each sub-forum between each month, even if it is just comparing Off-Topic for last month vs this month. That way you can quickly gauge what % of posts during that month were in a sub-forum that is generally frowned upon by many, including Stunna.

Once you flag people who have posted a high % of their monthly posts in Off Topic you can drilled down to post-level and see what they are saying. It's all about indicators.

It's good to see that MICRO's feedback has been directly picked up by Stunna and put to effect, with several participants set to not receiving (full) payment as a result of their violation of the terms.

Yeah I got it you are just raising a helping hand, I also thought about it this time but I wasn't comfortable judging members having higher activity or higher membership status to me also I wanted to make sure that it all goes well for the first time . Micro is also a mod @ PD so not many contradicted . so maybe next time I'll join in to share the workload , if thats fine.

I think that it's important that if MICRO does agree to share out the workload then it is just a couple of people, and that they operate to the same standard of judging post quality though generally the guideline is the terms set out by Stunna.

Yeah, I'm not surprised that MICRO took the initiative on carrying out this check as he is very passionate about PrimeDice, both the game and the programme. Stunna is fortunate to have somebody of his commitment in his ranks.

rohnearner

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 252

REAL-EYES || REAL-IZE || REAL-LIES||

Quote from: Cryptopher on July 19, 2014, 04:23:47 PM

Quote from: rohnearner on July 19, 2014, 04:13:52 PM

Quote from: Cryptopher on July 19, 2014, 03:48:23 PM

Thanks for spending the time to analyse, compile and deliver this feedback, MICRO. You've conducted a nice peer audit, flagging up some questionable participants within the PrimeDice programme.

As hilariousandco has offered, I'm also happy to chip in with some of the analysis. Perhaps if a standard for analysing post quality is defined then we can review quality in a consistent manner. However if you're happy to continue this process alone then that is fair enough.

PS. Thanks for the personal feedback

He has done it all already , also if you are offering some assistance you can help him next time if he does that , or you can go through the profiles again to make sure his ratings are fine , but let me tell you he's not gonna like it if you dispute his judgement , personally I won't like it if someone does that to me.

Woah relax, I wasn't talking about going over his existing analysis. Also if you read my whole post you would see that I was clearly referring to the next audit on post quality given that I thanked him for carrying out this particular audit and then thanked him for the feedback he provided regarding my post quality.

My intention is to help divide the workload the next time around, should he require it. 10 hours is a long time to spend, and that timeframe can change as the number of participants fluctuate and post more.

One way of getting a quick glance at indicators is comparing the number of posts in each sub-forum between each month, even if it is just comparing Off-Topic for last month vs this month. That way you can quickly gauge what % of posts during that month were in a sub-forum that is generally frowned upon by many, including Stunna.

Once you flag people who have posted a high % of their monthly posts in Off Topic you can drilled down to post-level and see what they are saying. It's all about indicators.

It's good to see that MICRO's feedback has been directly picked up by Stunna and put to effect, with several participants set to not receiving (full) payment as a result of their violation of the terms.

Yeah I got it you are just raising a helping hand, I also thought about it this time but I wasn't comfortable judging members having higher activity or higher membership status to me also I wanted to make sure that it all goes well for the first time . Micro is also a mod @ PD so not many contradicted . so maybe next time I'll join in to share the workload , if thats fine.

rohnearner

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 252

REAL-EYES || REAL-IZE || REAL-LIES||

Quote from: chaosPT on July 19, 2014, 04:17:15 PM

Did stunna pay you for doing this ?

I mean its like he is hire you already .

Naa he's not getting paid, just social service :p

@Micro You should mention it on OP that you aren't getting paid for doing it :p that too in Bold , red color and Size15

Cryptopher

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 1008

Keep it dense, yeah?

Quote from: rohnearner on July 19, 2014, 04:13:52 PM

Quote from: Cryptopher on July 19, 2014, 03:48:23 PM

Thanks for spending the time to analyse, compile and deliver this feedback, MICRO. You've conducted a nice peer audit, flagging up some questionable participants within the PrimeDice programme.

As hilariousandco has offered, I'm also happy to chip in with some of the analysis. Perhaps if a standard for analysing post quality is defined then we can review quality in a consistent manner. However if you're happy to continue this process alone then that is fair enough.

PS. Thanks for the personal feedback

He has done it all already , also if you are offering some assistance you can help him next time if he does that , or you can go through the profiles again to make sure his ratings are fine , but let me tell you he's not gonna like it if you dispute his judgement , personally I won't like it if someone does that to me.

Woah relax, I wasn't talking about going over his existing analysis. Also if you read my whole post you would see that I was clearly referring to the next audit on post quality given that I thanked him for carrying out this particular audit and then thanked him for the feedback he provided regarding my post quality.

My intention is to help divide the workload the next time around, should he require it. 10 hours is a long time to spend, and that timeframe can change as the number of participants fluctuate and post more.

One way of getting a quick glance at indicators is comparing the number of posts in each sub-forum between each month, even if it is just comparing Off-Topic for last month vs this month. That way you can quickly gauge what % of posts during that month were in a sub-forum that is generally frowned upon by many, including Stunna.

Once you flag people who have posted a high % of their monthly posts in Off Topic you can drilled down to post-level and see what they are saying. It's all about indicators.

It's good to see that MICRO's feedback has been directly picked up by Stunna and put to effect, with several participants set to not receiving (full) payment as a result of their violation of the terms.

chaosPT

hero member

Activity: 896

Merit: 1000

Did stunna pay you for doing this ?

I mean its like he is hire you already .

rohnearner

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 252

REAL-EYES || REAL-IZE || REAL-LIES||

Quote from: Cryptopher on July 19, 2014, 03:48:23 PM

Thanks for spending the time to analyse, compile and deliver this feedback, MICRO. You've conducted a nice peer audit, flagging up some questionable participants within the PrimeDice programme.

As hilariousandco has offered, I'm also happy to chip in with some of the analysis. Perhaps if a standard for analysing post quality is defined then we can review quality in a consistent manner. However if you're happy to continue this process alone then that is fair enough.

PS. Thanks for the personal feedback

He has done it all already , also if you are offering some assistance you can help him next time if he does that , or you can go through the profiles again to make sure his ratings are fine , but let me tell you he's not gonna like it if you dispute his judgement , personally I won't like it if someone does that to me.

Cryptopher

legendary

Activity: 1789

Merit: 1008

Keep it dense, yeah?

Thanks for spending the time to analyse, compile and deliver this feedback, MICRO. You've conducted a nice peer audit, flagging up some questionable participants within the PrimeDice programme.

As hilariousandco has offered, I'm also happy to chip in with some of the analysis. Perhaps if a standard for analysing post quality is defined then we can review quality in a consistent manner. However if you're happy to continue this process alone then that is fair enough.

PS. Thanks for the personal feedback

monbux

legendary

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1029

Heya MICRO, Good job

lynn_402

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 253

Quote from: madmat on July 19, 2014, 07:41:58 AM

Micro deserved his 0.2btc tip. I think next time, a lot of people will try to help to get their part of the tip

Good job Micro.

Sadly, the quality might not be as good since they may do it as fast as possible just to get tips.

Thanks Micro for possibly speeding-up our payments

madmat

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Micro deserved his 0.2btc tip. I think next time, a lot of people will try to help to get their part of the tip

Good job Micro.

Justin00

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice

Did you put your ID/link to profile in correctly when you 'claimed payment' a day or two ago ?
Perhaps yours was one the ones that had no profile ID.

Quote from: BitsBitsBits on July 19, 2014, 07:10:54 AM

Hello, I can't seem to find my ID in your spreadsheet even though I was a new enroller (last month).

BitsBitsBits

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Hello, I can't seem to find my ID in your spreadsheet even though I was a new enroller (last month).

MICRO

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1037

CEO @ Stake.com and Primedice.com

Quote from: onlinepro on July 19, 2014, 05:52:43 AM

Quote from: byt411 on July 19, 2014, 05:46:19 AM

Quote from: onlinepro on July 19, 2014, 05:43:34 AM

Quote from: MICRO on July 19, 2014, 05:22:34 AM

Quote from: onlinepro on July 19, 2014, 04:50:34 AM

Quote from: byt411 on July 19, 2014, 04:44:28 AM

Quote from: MICRO on July 19, 2014, 04:43:02 AM

Quote from: alexrossi on July 19, 2014, 03:36:28 AM

Quote from: MICRO on July 18, 2014, 09:39:52 AM

Quote from: Sindelar1938 on July 18, 2014, 09:36:22 AM

Just curious,are you doing this as a community service or is Stunna paying you together post quality?
Great idea, just wondering what's driving it

Nah, im doing it for free to help out so we can get payments faster Cheesy

(not that im in a hurry but some of u guys probably are) .

Thanks Micro for the awesome work!

Stunna sent me a huge tip for that so at the end i got paid much more than i shoulda been, but i was doing it for free

.

There are couple of un happy people with my judgement but , ofc that will always happen . If majority of people think i done good work, and Stunna also i will do this for the next time also.
And i will start checking for sig changing scamers right away .

Wow, are you telling me that the 0.2 was a bonus from Stunna? What a generous person he is.

Wow! That is more than I made with posting max amount of post in month!
I want to do this next time! Tongue

Posting 30 hours = 0.16BTC
Checking posts 10 hours = 0.2BTC
Much better hourly rate I must say

Well he posted that list and asked for help, anybody coulda done it. But nobody did. I took that and done it for free. And it paid off much more than it should .

Anyways its not about money, its that its much better when community is involved in fighting off spamers ,than we would not have cap on posts , and it would benefit us all.
And its better when we have multiple opinions on same topic if somebody have to much spam or not.

Everybody should help and it will be better for us all if we have good quality sig campaign .

When I saw it you already had this thread made so I didn't want to stole your work Cheesy

But why isn't Stunna sending payments now since you have checked everyone on the list?

Why are you so annoying and you keep asking?
Stunna would check again too, and then he would have to calculate payouts and send them. Stop being an impatient git.

I didn't mean to be annoying.
But if Stunna is going to check everyone anyway, what is point of that someone else checked them for him Huh

He won't check them again. But there is still ALOT of work. People trying to scam by claiming in some other name, and so on.
Some people claimed on 18th, some did not put link, he needs to work everything out.

Its alot of work. And he is pretty bussy man, im surprised he only takes 48h most of the time.
So pls be patient and don't worry about it.

Muhammed Zakir

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 509

I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!