Pages:
Author

Topic: Do ALL vaccines kill people? - page 4. (Read 926 times)

jr. member
Activity: 60
Merit: 1
July 29, 2021, 10:19:38 PM
#45
Vaccines are designed to produce antibodies against certain diseases in humans body. It is of great benefit to human beings. The value of vaccines cannot be denied because of special events.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
July 28, 2021, 11:27:52 AM
#43
The great virus assumption is this. That viruses exist. Why is it an assumption? Because exoxomes have exact counterparts that are called viruses.

Suppose a doctor picks a virus up off a table. How did it get to the table in the first place since nobody saw it go there from wherever? It's all assumption.

Where do viruses come from? Do they simply develop out of nothing in the air? No. They come from two places:
1. out of the bodies of plants, animals and microbes;
2. Lab development by researchers.

In the bodies of plans, animals, and microbes, viruses are simply exosomes. They are expelled right along with anything else the body expels, like sweat, or other excretions. What are exosomes?
Exosomes are nano-sized biovesicles released into surrounding body fluids upon fusion of multivesicular bodies and the plasma membrane. They were shown to carry cell-specific cargos of proteins, lipids, and genetic materials, and can be selectively taken up by neighboring or distant cells far from their release, reprogramming the recipient cells upon their bioactive compounds. Therefore, the regulated formation of exosomes, specific makeup of their cargo, cell-targeting specificity are of immense biological interest considering extremely high potential of exosomes as non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers, as well as therapeutic nanocarriers. ...

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 305
Pro financial, medical liberty
July 28, 2021, 12:29:28 AM
#42
Not all, only the more or less pure Graphen oxide injection like the covid gene therapy.
It has only negative effect on the person itself, only others benefit from it.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DbmT8BnOz2qb/

Delta mehh wait for when Lambda hit's later in the year.  Λ  Notice the bottom missing, aka Vaccineted.
https://dougbillings.us/video/dougs-continued-interview-with-karen-kingston-7-27-2021/


What is said here?
https://www.tiktok.com/@som_alto/video/6987777724454587649?lang=en&is_copy_url=0&is_from_webapp=v1&sender_device=pc&sender_web_id=6989792921025824261

As it leads to this
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IKQtalvgMIWi/
jr. member
Activity: 68
Merit: 5
July 27, 2021, 09:30:13 PM
#41
Vaccines can prevent the virus from spreading and help reduce the risk of vaccinated patients. Vaccines are a huge benefit for humans. The chance that the vaccine will kill people is very small, and accidental events are bound to exist.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
June 04, 2021, 06:04:11 PM
#40
Probably it is but mostly from the complications, lack of awareness when not to give vaccine to a person with disease and when to give. I read some shared post in facebook,his father is ok before he get vaccinated tho his having medication to diabetes butwhen he got the injection his health condition went to total chaos, he had vomitted blood,got high blood pressure and went to vegatative state. His child is asking for some help to doctors but no one is helping them due to high amount of patient to hospital. So I guess,vaccine become an irony instead of saving someones live it becomes your doze of death.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
June 02, 2021, 07:26:08 PM
#39
When it comes to the question on either all vaccines kill people,  the answer would always be no. Not all vaccines are killer agents, some would definitely have some positive effect while others would remain negative. The fact still remains that, its not safe yet to be comfortable with any vaccine with the adverse effect some still pose to humanity thus far. A lot of research and experiments still needs to be carried out and the result shouldn't end at logical conclusions but as facts instead. Facts that rules out any side effect either in the long run or short term. I'm still scared of all the vaccines out there.

Bit how do you know this? After all, maybe the vaccines kill at age 70 for some people, when they got vaccinated at age 0. Did you do the study?

How about taking several million babies from around the world. Split them into 2 equal groups. Vaccinate 1 group but not the other. Then track them until they die, and see for sure.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1139
June 02, 2021, 03:00:14 PM
#38
When it comes to the question on either all vaccines kill people,  the answer would always be no. Not all vaccines are killer agents, some would definitely have some positive effect while others would remain negative. The fact still remains that, its not safe yet to be comfortable with any vaccine with the adverse effect some still pose to humanity thus far. A lot of research and experiments still needs to be carried out and the result shouldn't end at logical conclusions but as facts instead. Facts that rules out any side effect either in the long run or short term. I'm still scared of all the vaccines out there.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
June 02, 2021, 02:50:52 PM
#37
If all vaccines were deadly, we wouldn't be using them. The truth is that only a small number of vaccines kill people. We cannot avoid risks in vaccination because the human body reacts differently to the ingredients of the medicine and we are not aware of it.

Actually, we use all the deadly vaccines because doctors are deadly and don't even know it, and Big Pharma who knows it likes the money better than live patients.

Cool
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 11
June 01, 2021, 09:15:03 AM
#36
If all vaccines were deadly, we wouldn't be using them. The truth is that only a small number of vaccines kill people. We cannot avoid risks in vaccination because the human body reacts differently to the ingredients of the medicine and we are not aware of it.
sr. member
Activity: 987
Merit: 289
Blue0x.com
June 01, 2021, 05:55:40 AM
#35
     I think only some are defective or is limited to specific brands like astrazenica. Which was banned here in my place after some people died after taking the second dose of the said vaccine. And just my luck, I was injected with the first dose and now they say that the second dose would be another brand. which is now making me quite skeptical of all the vaccines out there. But despite this, I still believe that vaccinations should continue still since if it doesn't, it would only make way for larger numbers of people getting the virus which is very detrimental for the economy all over the world. This kind of post is really misleading for the people, specially for those that are already doubting the vaccines. Spreading fear will only make things worse. Please stop doing this.
PIR
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 10
CRYPTOBLADES Octoblades 10.10
June 01, 2021, 05:07:17 AM
#34
No one really can tell the effect of vaccine years after one taking it. if it longer your life or shorten your life... its still under observation.. these experimental drug really somehow has effect those who are weak and has allergy on drug. The reason why others do not take it yet is because they are more afraid of it effect rather its cure..
full member
Activity: 616
Merit: 100
FRX: Ferocious Alpha
May 30, 2021, 05:35:23 AM
#33
News everywhere that the vaccines lessen the infected everyday, some people who vaccinated some side effect but this is normal specially you have commodities, declare 1st your commodities they find if you available to give the shot. Some say they is business from our government, maybe right because money is involvement in this situation.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18706
May 28, 2021, 04:33:49 AM
#32
Firstly, I'm interested in death rates.
That's my entire point. You deliberately cherry pick statistics that you think fit your narrative (they don't), much like you tried to cherry pick a study you thought fitted your narrative (it didn't). At least you admit it. Good thing your own copy-paste shows your claim about pre-1912 incidence data was a lie.

Feel free to keep going with the petty insults in lieu of any logic, though.
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 158
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
May 28, 2021, 01:41:33 AM
#31
It is also a fact that 100% of people who ever ate carrots eventually died. Avoid carrots at all cost.

Rather, do what should have been done with vaccines. After all, vaccines aren't natural. What is it? this...

Get about a million babies together, from all walks of life. Split them into two equal-sized groups. One group give no carrots. The other group, make sure they have at least a few carrots every week. Track them until they die naturally of old age. Check the age statistics.

Then eat carrots or not, based on who lived longer. Do the same with every new vaccine that comes out before giving it to the public... so at least the people know.

Cool

Abstract
Twenty five children who had undergone their full course of childhood immunization schedule were compared with 25 children who did not have any vaccinations for a period of five years. Parameters for comparison were measles, pertussis, poliomyelitis, tetanus and tuberculosis. Out of the 25 vaccinated children, only one child had mild measles at 2 1/2 years while 4 had suspected whooping cough at different points of the study period but not clinically diagnosed as pertussis. Among the unvaccinated group, 2 died of measles before the age of 3 years while 11 others went down with measles during an outbreak in 1986. An unvaccinated child also died of tetanus within the study period. In this paper we advocate the total integration of every community in the ongoing Expanded Programme for Immunization in Nigeria.

Well this articles shows something so give it a quick look  Wink
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
May 28, 2021, 01:33:09 AM
#30
Maybe spend less time throwing out petty insults and more time reading about the difference between "cases" and "deaths".

Once again, there are no data for case numbers prior to 1912.

Firstly, I'm interested in death rates.  I don't really care to much about infection of ailments which are easy to treat.  E.g., syphilis.

But, OK.  I've given you the data from the only source you will accept (corp/gov).  I even did you a solid by adding in population cause that's the kind of guy I am.

Go ahead and make your argument that diphtheria was not on the decline before the vaccine.  Hint:  It involves Fatality Rate.  I'm going to thoroughly enjoy watching you flop about, although I suspect you will take rain-check.

  DR = Death Rate (per 100,000 pop)
  I = Incidence (per 100,000 pop)
  FR = Fatality Rate (per incidence)

Code:
Yr	Pop	  Dip_DR Dip_I  Dip_FR
1900 76094000  40.3
1901 77584000  33.6
1902 79163000  29.8
1903 80632000  31.1
1904 82266000  29.3
1905 83822000  23.5
1906 85450000  26.3
1907 87008000  24.2
1908 88710000  21.9
1909 90490000  19.9
1910 92407000  21.1
1911 93863000  18.4
1912 95335000  17.6 139 12.66%
1913 97225000  18.1 142.1 12.74%
1914 99111000  17.2 152.5 11.28%
1915 100546000 15.2 132.7 11.45%
1916 101961000 13.9   129.2 10.76%
1917 103268000 15.6 133 11.73%
1918 103208000 14 101.5 13.79%
1919 104514000 14.9 144.7 10.30%
1920 106461000 15.3 139 11.01%
1921 108538000 17.7 190.7 9.28%  
1922 110049000 14.6 156.7 9.32%  
1923 111947000 12 131.4 9.13%  
1924 114109000 9.3 105.6 8.81%  
1925 115829000 7.8 82.1 9.50%  
1926 117397000 7.4 80.7 9.17%  
1927 119035000 7.7 89.8 8.57%  
1928 120509000 7.2 75.9 9.49%  
1929 121767000 6.5 70.1 9.27%  
1930 123077000 4.9 54.1 9.06%  
1931 124040000 4.8 57.1 8.41%  
1932 124840000 4.4 48 9.17%  
1933 125579000 3.9 40.2 9.70%  
1934 126374000 3.3 34.1 9.68%  
1935 127250000 3.1 30.8 10.06%
1936 128053000 2.4 23.4 10.26%
1937 128825000 2 22.2 9.01%  
1938 129825000 2 23.5 8.51%  
1939 130880000 1.5 18.4 8.15%  
1940 131954000 1.1 11.8 9.32%  
1941 133121000 1 13.5 7.41%  
1943 132885000 0.9 11 8.18%  
1944 132481000 0.9 10.6 8.49%  
1945 140054000 1.2 14.1 8.51%  
1946 143446000 0.9 11.7 7.69%  
1947 146093000 0.6 8.5 7.06%  
1948 148665000 0.4 6.5 6.15%  
1949 151235000 0.4 5.4 7.41%  
1950 153310000 0.3 8.8 3.41%  
1951 155687000 0.2 2.6 7.69%  
1952 158242000 0.1 1.9 5.26%  
1953 161164000 0.1 1.5 6.67%  
1954 164308000 0.1 1.3 7.69%  
1955 167306000 0.1 1.2 8.33%  
1956 170371000 0.1 0.9 11.11%
1957 173320000 0.7
1958 176289000 0.5
1959 177135000   0.5
1960 179979000 0.5
1961 182992000 0.3
1962 185771000 0.2
1963 188483000 0.2
1964 191141000 0.2
1965 193526000 0.1
1966 195576000 0.1
1967 197457000 0.1
1968 199399000 0.1
1969 201385000 0.1
1970 203810000 0.2

In an effort to provide some remedial medical education for the good 'doctor', I'll point out a shocking observation:

Turns out that when sewage is put into a ditch and transferred away from a living area, and when wells are sealed against surface water contamination, diseases such as diphtheria magically diminish!  Who could have known?

The trend toward better sanitation and better nutrition certainly didn't cease when the 'vaccine' was introduced in the 1920's.

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
May 27, 2021, 11:12:01 AM
#29
It is also a fact that 100% of people who ever ate carrots eventually died. Avoid carrots at all cost.

Rather, do what should have been done with vaccines. After all, vaccines aren't natural. What is it? this...

Get about a million babies together, from all walks of life. Split them into two equal-sized groups. One group give no carrots. The other group, make sure they have at least a few carrots every week. Track them until they die naturally of old age. Check the age statistics.

Then eat carrots or not, based on who lived longer. Do the same with every new vaccine that comes out before giving it to the public... so at least the people know.

Cool
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 28
May 26, 2021, 05:00:30 PM
#28
It is also a fact that 100% of people who ever ate carrots eventually died. Avoid carrots at all cost.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18706
May 26, 2021, 02:55:55 PM
#27
Maybe spend less time throwing out petty insults and more time reading about the difference between "cases" and "deaths".

Once again, there are no data for case numbers prior to 1912.
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
May 26, 2021, 02:46:46 PM
#26
Lol. Try clicking on "4: Infectious Disease Incidence in US (1900-1970)" at the top to be redirected to table with no data prior to 1912. As with the study you linked to before, maybe try actually reading things rather just assuming the top link from Google supports your nonsense opinions.

3: Infectious Disease Deaths in US (1900-1970) has the data.  I know you are a 'doctor' [chuckle] and not a Mathematician, but the math is pretty straightforward.  Lemme know if you need a hand with it.

Pages:
Jump to: