When we are in a casino where things are obvious in this way, we can sense that the pressure is not ours, and that is a plus, why? Because there is a lot of competition in the casinos, it is known that if they try to demand a lot from us, well, if we don't want to, we don't give orders, and we leave it like that, we look for another casino that doesn't bother us so much and we try it, there must be someone who doesn't. It bothers so much, that's how it is, the competition is the only thing, for that reason I recommend doing it, I clarify, this KYUC thing is not something that I like, I think that many do not like it, but it is something that is why we fight Against the grain, if there is a caisno that we like a lot, we can do that test, of course it is not that it is done with everyone, that is only with some in particular, obviously the corresponding research has to be done.
Yeah! It’s true that many people don’t like KYC verification.
When I am faced with such a need to undergo verification according to the KYC procedure, I just begin to get nervous and swear to myself because I have gone through this process more than a dozen times. And it definitely gets boring and annoying. Moreover, there are also different confirmation options, for example, including video images of faces. And all this data is transferred to someone unknown.
And they may well be used for some bad purposes. If there is even the slightest possibility of doing without KYC, I never go through this check again.
Yes, it is true that most gamblers who really prioritize the anonymity of personal data will refuse to be asked to do KYC because for them it is not only annoying but it is a very complicated process and is considered unsafe which makes them always refuse when asked for KYC.
But most of today's reputable gambling sites always ask for KYC before making a deposit or placing a bet and maybe this annoys someone but for me as long as the casino has high trustworthiness I will do KYC rather than lose huge amounts of money in a casino that doesn't have any reputation.
If they refused to complete any of their KYC request that means they are going to be frustrated while using the casino because they will be deprived of some benefits and functions, isn't it more better if a gambler feels like he cannot cope with having kyc challenges to go for the kind of casino categories that does not require kyc althrough, without filling in for kyc then you may not be able to make withdrawals and other things you would have been having access to.
But for me, this KYC refusal has disadvantages with several other features, namely the maximum betting limit is only small and if there is an account hack it will be very difficult to restore the account but it all depends on each person's opinion because we cannot go against other people's thoughts because I really understand gamblers who always look for casinos without KYC to prioritize his anonymity and they feel comfortable with the establishment he has planned to always refuse KYC.
However, for me, as long as I send KYC at a trusted casino, I will do KYC at least past KYC 1 just in case it is really needed one day.
It is that one of the things why I see why it is necessary to do a KYC is because the person has decided to do the KYC in a very reliable casino, because they can have a lot of trust, a high reputation and pleasant comments , This is what I call a trustworthy casino, of course these things are quite good when it comes to doing things to be able to establish a motto of always providing the best service and having the best trust system, otherwise no, because there are casinos that appear in the forum, they can even pay for good marketing, but they can still become scams, I have seen casinos that have everything under control, and comply with all the regulations, which is with the licenses and everything that the players have to demand, even so, this does not prevent that if they want to return to Sam they can do it, this type of thing is what we must take care of at all times, I have done KYC but in few places, in which I consider good and that they can't steal from me.
The oldest casinos are those that have a greater degree of trust to be Able to make a better option to be safe, for me the safest ones on the forum are few, but I can highlight bitcasino.io, stake.com, Duelbits, among others that They are very good, but mostly the first two are the ones that I consider the safest, in fact not everyone knows, but recently they hacked a part of the stake.com casino, where they stole a significant amount of money and that assumed that at the moment The fact that they did it put everyone on alert, obviously they suspended the games in the club for a few moments, then they began to look for a way to recover their money, but yes , they did not compromise the clients' money, something very significant and that gave I will speak very highly of the day, other casinos suspend activities and people's balances remain frozen and without being able to withdraw them, this is something that can be very good and gives a lot to Speak highly of stake.com.