Why do people always tend to play with these kind of sites which is not soo popular yet and reputable enough thats why sometimes the mistakes are on the players itself because they are not responsible enough to the risk involve on playing on a shady site.
This is the stupidest comment I've seen today.
At what point would you play a site according to its "popularity"? You have to realize, sites that start up are in fact unpopular, and hence according to you, not reputable and shady. If the onus is on the players, then how would any gambling site grow? How would Primedice have grown? This argument is just completely illogical.
Besides, you have to realize: oshi.io by no means looks unprofessional. If they weren't running on https, then that would be a red flag. If they had a simple UI made in HTML, then that would be a red flag [example girlbtc]. If they were a new casino with only newbies supporting them in the threads, then that would be a red flag. So far, I haven't come across any for oshi. So why is it shady?
Now then... as for this scam accusation...
Oshi definitely should handle the issue of these "double spend attacks" by simply changing one thing: waiting for a confirmation. If you're having so much trouble with these attacks, why not sacrifice a little bit of user experience for an increase in security? It's that simple.
@OP and/or Oshi
Can you post the transaction logs so that everyone can see the BTS of what's happening and why speculations are being thrown around?
