Topic: Do not trust actmyname. - page 11. (Read 23033 times)

Not working so well anymore, is it now? Here is a new thread where you're whining about marlboroza again: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/marlboroza-is-abusing-dt-power-4006863

Who said DT members have to agree with one another? If that were the case then it would truly be a horrible centralized cartel, like you've been spouting. Pick one or the other and stick with it.

If you paid any attention to the past, you would realize that this "DT cartel" has had its own brand of problems on multiple occasions. There's been tons of drama with exclusions and inclusions.

Regardless of who is getting paid, you're basically offering a free pass to scammers. What, they can get off easily with just a fine? That's not the way to go with it. I don't see how that would be beneficial at all. You can scam for way more than $50 here. Easily.

If my feedback has been unjust then I would have been removed months ago.

How long does it take to quote a post and reply here with the contents?

Rather than doing so, you continue to repeat the same old crap.

Redundancy in feedback is not a bad thing. And just because I sent it to one individual doesn't mean I have to send it to all tagged members. Keep in mind (again) that you're not special. I've sent out negative feedback to many users other than you. I've responded to threads about me many times before.

From what?

So then I can offer unfair terms that don't guarantee a service and get away scot-free with it? That's not how it works in the real world and that's not how it works here.

You're being a bit repetitive now.

When have I ever said this? This is just false.

Because there isn't one specific thing they can refer to. Apart from Hhampuz's.

I have been objective. In fact, many a time I have disagreed with TP, marlboroza, OgNasty and Lauda. All of which are on DefaultTrust.

More like: I've been left positive trust by the people that I trust. I sent TP positive feedback before he sent it to me, by the way. All other feedback from me was sent prior to their positive feedback.

How does tagging you benefit me in any way? I'm not taking advantage of you.

Can confirm this goy "actmyname" is part of the bullies team, just another asshole having fun dictating his rules on the forum

Who are you to dictate your own terms for my business, you are trying to abuse me with your DT power, you are also trying to undermine marlboroza. I have said that people should pay to the forum and not me. but you are trying to waste my time. you are not reading the whole thread where I have convinced marlboroza to remove his tag on me. you are trying to bully me with your DT power, now that you have this power, you want me to waste my time and explain myself to you. this is harassment. you should be removed from DT, you turned this trust system to your tool for harassing people. you are saying that after I have convinced marlboroza now I should convince you, this is bullying. you are trying to hold your power over me saying that I need to explain myself over and over. you are not helping this community, you are holding people down with your DT power.

You might as well tag everybody else who got tagged by other DT members and ask them to suck for you too. this is abuse and harassment. you don't deserve to hold this power. what you are doing is causing me to engage in unnecessary refute over a resolved issue.

Every other DT member should now tag me and ask me for explanation? that is abuse and harassment, you should be removed from DT. you are distracting everybody here.

You are not in a position to dictate the terms of my business affairs. you are just using your power to fuck with me. therefore you should be removed from DT to avoid this kind of unwanted discussions over and over and over and over. you are not helping anybody, you are tagging me and then asking me to kiss your ass to convince you removing your tag. you have also a lot of positive feedbacks without reference, you are abusing your power, why should we trust your words if you don't know how to be objective in your judgement? @people of Bitcointalk, tell me that you don't really see what is happening here. why should we trust actmyname's words? he has left positive trust for the people who have left positive trust for him. they are all taking advantage over us. and they think that we should trust them after repeatedly abusing other forum members.

You're the one damaging your reputation. Your own words and actions are referenced in the trust ratings you got.

And you keep digging:


So you went from "red tag removal service" to "I don't care [I just want to get paid]".

Do you seriously think that I believe every single thing Timelord writes? No. However, I based my feedback off of his. Of course, I would investigate independently first. You also still haven't shown me your defense.

You still think you're so special. This is what happens when kids get in trouble, eh? I've already told you that you're not being specifically targeted. You're just very vocal and annoying, which means I will respond to you more often than someone that doesn't post about me at all.

Yes, I am. Thus you should defend your case yourself, just as you've offered that service to others

Blazed is not that active on BCT, AFAIK.

---

Thanks for deleting my post, by the way. I'll just repost it here:

The difference between a qualified lawyer and you is that they:
a) have knowledge of how the system works (you don't really)
b) will usually have past experience, either in the field or some mocks in law school (you don't really)
c) have a pre-existing reputation (you don't really)[/quote]

Why would you tag me based on Timelord2067 feedback? because you are trying to bully me with DT power you have, if Blazed is going to stay quite here, he is on to this abuse of power and is not taking any action. you are inflicting damage on my reputation. if he has nothing to say after seeing your actions, it means that he doesn't care if your actions are hurting my reputation. if he doesn't care for other people's reputation, why should we allow him to keep the power over other people? being on DT comes with a responsibility, if he is not willing to spend his time, he shouldn't be on DT because the people on his trust list are abusing and harassing forum members.

In the context of his... hmm... character I would see anything where he asks for money as a huge red flag, possibly needing negative feedback. I'm not sure what mediation would entail so I can't say specifically.

Digaran is for sure one strange guy....
I've always tried to stay away from those topics as whenever he is involved shit hits the fan, Tim Hortons style.

Sometimes I feel like he's just child trying to get attention by breaking another vase or shaving the cat no, not that cat, and sometimes he seems pure evil, oozing envy or malice, dunno really what's with him.
Reading his threads and his posts in the morning I feel bad for him and get the impression he's really sorry but after two replies he manages to screw things up again.

Not that I'm defending him but I doubt that even he didn't believe for a second he might have customers with his so called "services".


If he had offered "mediation services" for a fee, still no guarantee, would that have triggered the red trust?
Just curios...

I'm going to regret posting here in less than an hour, I'm pretty sure of it.

Blazed has actmyname on his trust list, and theymos has ~actmyname on his trust list.

How? Take the exact quote that changed marlboroza's mind.

As many times as necessary.

But you should explain your actions.

That refutation lacks substance. It's the same used argument that account sellers make: "If you tagged me then why didn't you tag everyone else?"

Stop thinking you're special. The day before you were tagged, I also negged 7 users. It's not a 'targeted attack'.

I have already resolved the issue here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/calling-out-vod-for-his-trusted-input-3502223

How many times do I need to defend myself? this is harassment and I will never forgive you for it actmyname. you don't deserve to be on DT, this is harassment, I shouldn't have to explain myself to every DT member every time they have a boner for me and decide to tag me.

@theymos, right now actmyname's excuse for tagging me is that he took Timelord2067's feedback as the reference, why isn't he tagging all other people who got tagged by timelord2067?

I would like to request for a review on actmyname actions. who is in charge for him to be on DT? honestly tell me if you can't see that he is harassing me?

EDIT: are people plagiarizing me now? take a look at reputation and the titles. lol.

Look, digaran is our new campaign manager: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/campaign-manager-digaran-at-your-service-3957080

Archive: https://archive.fo/1flaa

This is actually starting to get fun

Red trust is not going to prevent you from defending people and even getting paid for it, if people agree with your terms. I'm a big fan of informed decisions. You're being suspiciously erratic with your incessant post edits and other shady shit so I'm helpfully highlighting all that.

Now, seriously, don't you need to start actually working on your business?

Perhaps a more apt analogy is if I were to offer a service to unban others: to try and make a case for them, for a fee.

It's essentially the same thing: if I don't offer refunds and I can't be expected to consistently resolve the problem (especially considering the customer demographic is more than often in the wrong) then that's pretty much a scam attempt.

Where can i hire you? Seems like a reasonable escrow terms. But seriously, digaran is doing this for the lulz. There is funny trolling and then there is digaran. I hope that you don't remove your tag, as he is pretty shady and no one can know whether he is being for real or not.

However asking for 0.02BTC to "defend" people with red tags is impossible, as i doubt that people here who are pretty much anonymous to a certain point, can be made to remove their tags. That to me personally is scamming.

What if I were to propose an escrow service?

Terms: You must pay a fee of 95% or 2 BTC, whichever is higher. There is no refund if I send it to a wrong address, which I may do so 50% of the time. Also, if you do not PM me every single day after you request my services, I will back out of any deal and the fees will be kept.

---

Unfair terms can be attacked.

I want to get paid for spending my time on defending people, who are you to dictate your own terms for my business?