Topic: Do not trust actmyname. - page 8. (Read 23033 times)

Fixed that one for you.



Your opinion on the motivation of the tags is just that, an opinion. Everyone else seems to think differently and that the tags were given legitimately because of your actions. That's all been explained countless times to you, so I won't waste time repeating it.

Saw the thread. What relevance does this have?

Every since I have become a DT member, these people have ganged up on me. I have already explained the motivation behind my tags. However, your dislike of me is preventing you from seeing the truth.

Could you explain why you tagged Bazinga and why it took long time to tag him?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1246188
archived thread https://archive.li/xg1fJ

Don't you know? ever since I have applied to be a moderator these people have ganged up on me. I have already explained the motivation behind my tags. none of them are legit. however your dislike of me is stopping you from seeing the truth.

Did you actually send any money to yahoo62278 to invest on your behalf? If not, then this is a false allegation. Or are you claiming that you invested in that ICO purely because the signature campaign was being managed by yahoo62278? If so, then that is pretty poor "due diligence" on your part.

All these people blaming campaign managers for the actions of the ICO devs are effectively shooting the messenger. I suspect because they're an easy, visible target... I doubt that the campaign managers are privy to all the intentions of these ICOs (NOTE: the case with atriz having some insider knowledge regarding the ICO using dodgy "marketing tactics" and failing to disclose this is an obvious exception). These managers are for the most part completely unrelated to the ICO itself... and are just hired to prepare a spreadsheet, pick some participants and count some posts.

Holding someone accountable for the actions of a third-party, that they have been contracted to do a job for, is a bit unfair in my opinion. Perhaps it is time that the campaign managers started putting explicit disclaimers on their campaign threads explaining that they do not personally endorse any of these ICOs?

/\ /\ /\
Save that for "Dateline's: To Catch a Predator"

So, people get marked for not professionally shilling for managers who have histories of sponsoring exit scams ---> and exit scam promoters get positive trust for running successful exit scam campaigns?  You're just a dirt bag!  LOL

Going to address this first. There is absolutely no reason for me (at that time) to get involved in any drama and collusion. It does not benefit me at all and would not benefit people who are trying to collude together. After all, I was included into DT in 2018. Not the beginning of 2017.

What does sharing PGP keys having to do with collusion? Additionally, that information is already public on the profile and we don't have to follow one another to chat. I also don't have parity with followers:following. I would also like to note that of the 8 users that I am following on that Keybase account, only one of them has "traded trust" with me. Furthermore, DarkStar_ was actually not part of DT when they sent that feedback to me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

---

As for your whole yahoo spiel... when you manage a campaign for a product that looks legitimate but then it turns out to be a scam/shady, is that your fault? e.g. Betcoin

Adding fodder for butthurt users to latch on is always fun since they think they will have some topics more to talk about.

This guy ---> https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yahoo62278-355846 Who took our money and gave it to these guys ---> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/chain-of-points-signature-campaignclosed-1801121 Before they exited and scrubbed their sites from the internet ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1773304.220

And....same guy managed this exit scam ----> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12353698 ---> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13516198 ---> who robbed us again ---> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=759702.1940


Everybody seen it!  Yet, you give him positive trust while you give negative trust to users who merely post subpar posts shilling for the very same campaign managers that have been ripping us off for years with their exits!  You've been exposed dude!  And ---> when I pointed those exit scams out to you ---> you negged me again! Why? ---> Trust abuse and collusion to promote scammers!

Wow. Because I follow users on Keybase, I am obviously colluding with them. Well shit, time to follow Warren Buffet!

Whooosh.

You lot always assume that there are always these conspiracies and underground dealings with DT members but the worst thing I've seen (subjective) is getting killyou to buy a flamingo and sandwiches.

What exit-scam projects have I given positive trust to? Show me and I will replace the feedback with a negative.

You don't collude with other members, really? ---> You're a liar ---> https://keybase.io/actmyname who also poses as an 11 year old to, obviously, attract the attention of underage children --->


 
For what?  Is the crew you're associated with grooming them for some odd reason?  One of your next projects?

I still play at Betcoin ---> unlike the projects you've given positive trust to that have exited with everybody's money, they're still around and have been around since 2014.

digaran, buddy, just head here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full and have a look at who has the people you do not believe should be on DT within their trust list. Contact these people either through one PM and have a conversation with them about why you believe they should remove these people from their list.

I can even make it easy for you

actmyname - Blazed
suchmoon - Blazed , dooglus
marlboroza - hilariousandco

Blazed - Tomatocage, Cyrus
dooglus - theymos, HostFat, dserrano5, tomatocage, Cyrus
hilariousandco - theymos

You can just go right up the chain or "hierarchy" and try to get everyone removed that disagrees with you. Let us know how successful you are, although your trust rating should be a solid indication.

So you're going to have to successfully convince three separate users to remove someone from their trust list. To my knowledge, that has never been accomplished before so you would have quite the marketing campaign for your lawyer service. You'll have to convince Blazed to remove two users from their trust list, and that might be harder than getting Blazed removed from DT. Maybe instead you could try getting Blazed, dooglus and hilariousandco removed from DT. I'm very curious which angle you plan to approach this from, but generally once you've made a big stink like this, even if you get your current ratings removed somebody will most likely replace them.  


I've always said that he's got his moments. Gotten a few good laughs out of digaran, but I'm unsure how self-aware any of the comedy is, we might be giving him too much credit at this point.

Ironic, considering you've heavily shilled Betcoin.

I have yet to PM or receive a PM from some of the users that I have given a positive trust to. The worst thing that I have done is make a snide comment about butthurt users like yourself in a private message. Apart from that, I don't really talk to a lot of other DT users.

---

Always applying post hoc to every single event, aren't you? Certainly then, because I received a negative feedback from xSplit and Bazinga442 after tagging you, they are your alternate accounts!

It wasn't a bribe?

Not only is the punk a trust abuser but he actively endorses people who have been involved in multiple exit scams ---> he is aligned with a group of other DT2 members who actively manipulate the trust system to direct traffic to their scams ---> he's not alone.  There's a whole network of these punks on site actively working with one another to rip off other members. Just ignore them or they'll red mark you, and avoid the sites in their signatures at all cost ---> they've already ripped me off twice!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35899233

Or you could merit people who'd talk against me. for example we could see it here. note the time of that post and the time of 5 merits received by OP of that thread for reporting a newbie with 7 posts for spamming. something that could be done by reporting to the moderators however suchmoon wanted to have a personal use of merit as well, unless he has merited that OP and everybody else who has talked against me thus far from his own sMerits, I'd say that he is also misusing the merit system like trust. note that he is a merit source.

@suchmoon, I can't be bought. bribe or intimidation doesn't work on me.

merit abuse! suchmoon == digaran #confirmed! 

Can't believe this entire thread was simply a long con by suchmoon to be able to merit his alt!




Note: the above post has no basis in truth. It is purely for comedy purposes only

If I don't deserve my DT status you should talk to DT1 members. You have repeatedly refused to even try that. I'm guessing it's because that would resolve the situation one way or another but you prefer the never-ending drama.

You keep lying that I tagged you because of the merit source application. Trust feedback has nothing to do with merit. Theymos doesn't care what I think about you.

The way you continue to ascribe "power" to some virtual positions on an internet forum is quite hilarious, I'll give you that. Have a merit for the comedy value.

I know right, I want to show you that you guys don't deserve your status on DT. if I speak against you and then get a tag, that would be abuse of power.
If for example: you have shown me your dislike of me over the past several months, I had my thread opened for days and I was even discussing it with some of the DT members, all of a sudden you found my thread as a sign of untrustworthiness and tagged me after I posted on a merit source application.

We know that you were against me being a merit source from the start. you just wanted to show your power to me and say that I'm not trustworthy. as I have said it before, nothing I can do to force you physically to remove your tag on me. I just wish and hope for you to face even a worse situation than I have and know the feeling. I'm saying this in public, you could later come back here and see that I was the one who wished this for you.

I have absolutely zero power here. you have decided to bully and sabotage me regardless. I'm telling you now that I will not forgive you for this.
I'm just a pawn in this game of power. you should realize that by now, you are however lost and drunk in your game and can't see it.

You're not really trying to clear your name, you're just trying to drag everyone into your shit, like for example with this post - DT1, DT2, theymos, Timelord...

Yeah, you see that type of behavior on sites that are dedicated to discussing conspiracy theories.  Anytime you give good physical evidence why there wasn't thermite (or nanothermite) in WTC7, the Truthers will just say you're in on the disinformation campaign.  No offense to anyone here who thinks 9/11 was an inside job, as we're free to disagree.  This was just an example of the "la la la la, I can't heeear youuu!!" attitude.  These people just like the attention they get from holding a stance that's contrary to pretty much everyone else, and I think that might fit digaran like OJ Simpson's glove. 

Diggums:  Give it up already, this is an argument that you are destined to lose.  Repeatedly, and to your detriment if you continue to kick and scream.  That's not a threat, because thus far I've withheld any sort of negative trust and have no intention of giving you one.  I have already given my opinion that you are a harmless boob, and I'm sticking to that.  But other members obviously don't feel that way, and you are bringing very negative attention to yourself and this may prompt others to jump on the negging bandwagon.  Don't push it.

What part of my feedback is false?

??? You don't want me to lose my DT status but you don't want me on DT. What?

You need to look up the definition of "few".

Believe whatever you want to believe but it's already been confirmed many times over that I'm Lauda./s

So you would be happy with Timelord applying negative trust for the same feedback but not me. I don't quite understand your logic.

For the record, the real reason is because of a 'war on spam' of sorts, which ended with the implementation of the merit system. At the time, I must have had over 200 negative feedbacks sent out to spammers.