Everyone knows that's it's necessary to check a project's social media pages and whitepaper while analysing ICO projects, but first of all we are investing in the technology, not in the marketing. So the main thing to take a look at should be GitHub of the project, and looking at it we can get the overall picture about how the team is working and whether the funds that are being raised are really spent on the development of the project.
Do you agree with this? How important is GitHub for you in ICO analysis?
There are numerous criteria evaluating an ICO project. Certainly one of them is assessing the team's ability to deliver the technology.
If you have a strong technical background, reviewing technical assets such as specifications, code, and test cases are important milestones you can verify.
Many, perhaps most, ICO investors don't have such a background.
What probably is a better criteria is the background and track record of the team. This will show whether they have a consistent record of delivering significant software projects. Any ICO investor can assess this.