Lately all the projects try to attract best faces onboard for their projects, I started noticing that they are almost the same everywhere. What things are more important for you? Are advisors one of the most significant criteria?
When choosing a project, I draw a lot of criteria, because for me everything is important and certainly one of the main criteria is the project advisor. 
Topic: Do you pay attention on advisors when choosing a good ICO project? (Read 574 times)
March 13, 2018, 11:28:41 AM
Actually I don't pay any attention to advisers on any ICO because their faces are almost always unknown for me, I guess and for the rest of regular users. Maybe I will make a quick run over their working placed but that's all.
For me most important is ICO to have MVP or being close to MVP. Or the conception must be extraordinary.
For me most important is ICO to have MVP or being close to MVP. Or the conception must be extraordinary.
March 13, 2018, 11:24:07 AM
it is best to look at the idea, not the faces .. well, it is desirable that the company had at least more or less well-established people who can and do want to achieve their result
March 12, 2018, 04:28:26 AM
I don't think advisors is the most significant criteria, anyone can be paid to say good things, every aspect of an ICO project is important. reading through the white paper makes you know more about the ICO and whether its worth investing in. if you listen o advisors and take action based on their views then there is a high chance of failure.
March 12, 2018, 04:28:11 AM
I think if ICO has strong team advisers are not so important, but it makes sense when some experienced people are involved.
March 12, 2018, 04:22:06 AM
I think Core team is more important in case of ICO
March 12, 2018, 04:11:09 AM
Lately all the projects try to attract best faces onboard for their projects, I started noticing that they are almost the same everywhere. What things are more important for you? Are advisors one of the most significant criteria?
To avoid something that is not desirable if you want to invest in a project, advisor is certainly very important because from there we can get the main source of the project that we will invest. although advisers are a prime object to do a basic research if we want to invest in a large project. but in addition, looking more deeply at the existing team will certainly be much more important because by looking in detail the project can be an assessment and consideration of its own without being affected by others. 
February 26, 2018, 12:17:46 AM
Lately all the projects try to attract best faces onboard for their projects, I started noticing that they are almost the same everywhere. What things are more important for you? Are advisors one of the most significant criteria?
Recently, I began to notice that many projects specifically take famous advisers to raise more money. I try to look not only at the composition of the team, but also on the possibility of implementing the idea.
February 26, 2018, 12:16:17 AM
Lately all the projects try to attract best faces onboard for their projects, I started noticing that they are almost the same everywhere. What things are more important for you? Are advisors one of the most significant criteria?
For me, advisors are one of those important factors that will make a project more realistic but my focus is not about them but of course to the idea of the project and to the team who works with it. Ideas must be unique and not a copy paste of anothers project. Working application is also one factor on how motivated the developers of the project either they work pretty hard on it or just joking with a script kiddie designs in terms of websites, platform or even the application itself. February 26, 2018, 12:08:21 AM
Beware the ICO advisor, the ICO specialist, the ICO advisory and yes it depends on what role they are playing. Are they handling the end to end ICO process or just the PR and Marketing?
February 26, 2018, 12:04:50 AM
Yes, sure.
I have to admit I bought Universa Ico (my first ever bought ICO) just because I saw name of Mr. Mac Affee.
Turn out this is a good project.
I have to admit I bought Universa Ico (my first ever bought ICO) just because I saw name of Mr. Mac Affee.
Turn out this is a good project.
February 26, 2018, 12:00:59 AM
Lately all the projects try to attract best faces onboard for their projects, I started noticing that they are almost the same everywhere. What things are more important for you? Are advisors one of the most significant criteria?
Recently, I began to notice that many projects specifically take famous advisers to raise more money. I try to look not only at the composition of the team, but also on the possibility of implementing the idea.
February 18, 2018, 12:33:50 PM
Oh sure. It is very important to pay attention to the advisors. On the one hand, they also recieve payment from companies, and they have a subjective opinion. On the other hand, in order not to spoil their reputation, famous advisers are unlikely to support scammers.
February 18, 2018, 11:00:06 AM
A majority of famous advisers are promoting ICO just for money, nevertheless they create bustle around project and it influences on collection progress. So when I see Mcafee of Drake in advisory board, it makes me confident in success of ICO
February 13, 2018, 04:01:44 AM
As one of the factors. Unfortunately, with so many projects at the moment, sometimes there is not enough time to check all the information, and the advisor is quite a good determinant. You can see his previous projects and how they passed.
February 13, 2018, 03:47:16 AM
Having a consultant is certainly not the main criterion when choosing an ICO project. He does not guarantee that the upcoming project will be successful. Basically, you need to rely on more important criteria, such as: road map, white paper, team working on the project, the value of their released token. Involvement of a consultant in a team is most likely a move to attract potential investors, this is the person who should tell a beautiful story about the project, etc.
February 13, 2018, 03:27:17 AM
As few ICO will be real success, any aspect of it has to be studyed. The advisor is obviously important. "Famous" ones are experienced and their presence is a good indication of the quality of the project.
February 13, 2018, 03:25:23 AM
reputable advisors do help to filter out potential good ICOs from scams. they also bring in their experience and help drive projects towards success
February 13, 2018, 03:16:54 AM
I hardly pay attention to advisors honestly. I always feel like advisors are written there just for advertising purposes, its like paid ads. I do think people add them into account but I do not.
February 13, 2018, 03:13:28 AM
Yes i Do you pay attention & its definitely important things . you can judge which trading platform the ICO project might be based on from a consultant from the ICO team.one of the success factor in ICO is the team behind the ICO, people will check the legitimate and the experience of the team before they invest ico.
Jump to: