I think it is a good marketing idea to associate one's business with reputable authorities in certain niches.
Personally, I feel more safe to use a casino if it has a successful collaboration with one of the bigger thought leaders on this forum. I'm not referring necessarily to bounty managers, but a good quality and well managed campaign can certainly make a difference. The casino quality needs to match the "ambassadors" though. You can't hide the crocodile behind the bush. Also a reputable bounty manager won't usually take on work unless it meets certain standards.
I think this is one of the best answers I have found in this thread, because I don't think it can be better described, honestly I am usually a person who when I see a casino that is managed by a recognized campaign manager I don't worry about the site, I know that the manager would not let anything strange happen and I am sure that in case something bad or not good would stop the campaign just to see unusual behavior, here we are all human they can also make mistakes and if they do I think it is understandable and we cannot hit it with a hammer, in every place, in every casino, in every bet there will always be risks, and we are the ones who decide whether to take them or not.
Thats why we do have those comparison in between managers which are known and reputable into this forum and to those who are just new into this industry or job which it would really be that common sense that
we should go for the best current ones but of course it would really be costing you a little bit more but hence on the attention and relevance for such exposure and being recognized which would really be worth.
There's no assurance though for success but its true that known managers wont really be accepting a deal if they do see that the site or service isnt really that worth to be advertised or being exposed
into the current market but it all depends because there are people or managers who do accept even though it is shit looking.