Honestly it's too crazy that we still dont know the 4th richest man of the earth nor we do know who created Bitcoin
For me this is exceptionally good opsec and for the sake of Satoshi's security nobody should try to de-anonymize them
[1].
What would you do if every criminal or government thinks you've likely mined around a million Bitcoins? (See fictional miner "Patoshi",
http://satoshiblocks.info/, I don't judge if "Patoshi" might've been Satoshi or not; the majority of those nearly 22k mined blocks haven't moved yet.)
You can't prove you don't have the keys anymore, so there are a lot of unscrupulous subjects who would do unspeakable things to Satoshi to obtain those coins. I'm pretty sure, disclosing Satoshi's identity is like a death sentence for them. Who wants that??
Let's respect their decision to be and stay anonymous. It's a great mystery and aura! Bitcoin works without knowing who Satoshi Nakamoto actually is.
[1] I don't believe that Satoshi Nakamoto is a group of people, because it would be exponentially harder to keep a group anonymous and nobody of the group makes an accidental error or breaks anonymity due to growing disagreement. Sometimes I use "they, them, their" for an individual when I don't want to assign gender for whatever reasons.