I know many project managers that handles good projects such as Jamalezaz, bounty detective, and many others most of them are either hero members or legend, I believe they have enough experience to handle it mere considering their ranks, not to say the rank is the only criteria to be a good project manager.i always doubt those project starters with newbie ranks.is it that they decide to use a new forum page,or were the restarting after being hacked or disqualified or how come a new be is handling a project? This are few questions that comes to my mind about newbie managers.
i am thinking they have no rellation that active in bitcointalk forum that could help them to spread about project. and newbie rank will make investors doubt about project quality, usually they didnt explain project detailly to all member . its not about restarting or being hacked, but purely it represent project quality. 
Topic: Do you trust newbies that starts projects? - page 17. (Read 66145 times)
Doubting them is a good sign. You are trying to keep yourself safe from being scammed.
Newbie or Legendary, it doesn't matter. Anyone could be tempted to make a bad decision.
Higher rankings though are more careful since they don't want to waste their accounts.
Anyway, it's not always about who will manage it. Some of them are just there to keep the discipline with bounty hunters but they don't handle the coins.
Payments will still be done by the project owner or the team behind it.
What you should be looking at is how good the project is and verify their credibility.
Newbie or Legendary, it doesn't matter. Anyone could be tempted to make a bad decision.
Higher rankings though are more careful since they don't want to waste their accounts.
Anyway, it's not always about who will manage it. Some of them are just there to keep the discipline with bounty hunters but they don't handle the coins.
Payments will still be done by the project owner or the team behind it.
What you should be looking at is how good the project is and verify their credibility.
Most of the new members who manage the projects have low skills which is why they fail to manage in fact it is not possible to say what is good or bad until the projects are successful but most newcomer projects are scams. There are also many project managers who are getting trust in which case the reliability of the projects is less but the projects of the members like the higher rank of the forum are better these get a lot of reliability when it comes to project management all of these projects reduce the risk a lot.
There are so many projects that have become scam project even that has already created by the legendary members. There are still so many developers didn't aware about the existing of this forum.
It's not a bad thing to see there was a new account that creates a new campaign or announcement thread here.
The rank didn't matter a lot in this case. You should change your perspetive about that. it's not all of projects created by newbies were scam.
It's not a bad thing to see there was a new account that creates a new campaign or announcement thread here.
The rank didn't matter a lot in this case. You should change your perspetive about that. it's not all of projects created by newbies were scam.
I only see a few low-rank members who manage and handle the bounty project very well, but most low-rank members who manage the bounty project is unsuccessful and ended up a scam. That is why we only participate in high-rank members like a sr.member, hero, and legendary members in this forum because we can trust them, but we are still not sure if the project will be successful.
As far as i know if we can't generalize any projects that runs by newbie as the scam project. Did you see definer? it's been running by newbie as an account who has made the announcement thread about that but this coin is legit.
It's only the rank and so many team from the projects were creating the new account for the purpose to create announcement in this forum.
That depends on how legit the project is.
We must DYOR.
It's only the rank and so many team from the projects were creating the new account for the purpose to create announcement in this forum.
That depends on how legit the project is.
We must DYOR.
Everyone has been a newbie in this forum, only time and contributions are made by certain people so that they can be ranked as Hero / Legendary, Sr Member or Full Member. The longer a person is here, the greater their contribution, the faster they will rank up in line with that person's reputation.
Trusting a project launched by a newbie is very risky, but if over time the newbie can prove that he is trusted, then the level of trust in the newbie will increase.
It takes a long process to build a trust in this forum.
The newbie in the forum is not a problem, but if the team and developers are newbies in real life, then it could be a problem.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1028
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
As far as i know if we can't generalize any projects that runs by newbie as the scam project. Did you see definer? it's been running by newbie as an account who has made the announcement thread about that but this coin is legit.
It's only the rank and so many team from the projects were creating the new account for the purpose to create announcement in this forum.
That depends on how legit the project is.
We must DYOR.
It's only the rank and so many team from the projects were creating the new account for the purpose to create announcement in this forum.
That depends on how legit the project is.
We must DYOR.
you know bubbalex? he is still a full member, but his track record as a bounty manager is excellent. yes, it is not a benchmark for how the project will run, but we do need a bounty manager with a high rank so that we can believe in his credibility as a manager. but that is not guarantee, you know sylon? His current rank is legendary, and I was involved in a bounty where he was his manager and his rank at that time was a senior member, but the project failed. I think the bounty manager's reputation is not about his rank, but how the project he handled was successful.
Bubbalex trusted manager campaign and have track record with worth bounty campaign although have trouble with distribution payment, I don't know why always his worth campaign and have higher value on exchange market like DIA but distribution for long term and always sending by several phase without give all 1000%. Does he take benefit for selling first and waiting until price back to lower price and give distribution for bounty campaign reward, I know how many time he manage worth campaign bounty and distribution waiting more than three or four months later after campaign ended, we must get reward 10% until 20% each month until three or five months later for completed reward payment.
Bounty projects doesn't look by rank on whom who handles it, however it is more conventional and more reliable if you join with trusted well known managers in order for you to be paid and given rewards in the long run. But newbie managers also has the chance to handle projects. Some might be trusted some also cannot due to experience.
you know bubbalex? he is still a full member, but his track record as a bounty manager is excellent. yes, it is not a benchmark for how the project will run, but we do need a bounty manager with a high rank so that we can believe in his credibility as a manager. but that is not guarantee, you know sylon? His current rank is legendary, and I was involved in a bounty where he was his manager and his rank at that time was a senior member, but the project failed. I think the bounty manager's reputation is not about his rank, but how the project he handled was successful.
Maybe it's not a matter of rank but a matter of how experienced he is in holding projects and all projects we also need to do own research, lots of high ranks handled project but also failed. There are several reasons for a newbie to hold a project, including from an internal project person or someone who is completely new. Actually what is needed is not only rank but also how he can provide justice for bounty hunters. Lots of high ranks but finally took responsibility when the project developers tried to play with the bounty hunter. And one more, Escrow is very important no matter the rank
I know many project managers that handles good projects such as Jamalezaz, bounty detective, and many others most of them are either hero members or legend, I believe they have enough experience to handle it mere considering their ranks, not to say the rank is the only criteria to be a good project manager.i always doubt those project starters with newbie ranks.is it that they decide to use a new forum page,or were the restarting after being hacked or disqualified or how come a new be is handling a project? This are few questions that comes to my mind about newbie managers.
Still remember with Jamal Aziz how does he manage many worth campaign last three years and I am glad with him, but now many not worth campaign although manager by trusted and experience person like bounty detective, now we have see how the result from bounty detective campaign like home token have lower price and become shit coin after distributing. Many bad campaign right now and only trusted with manager have good reputation for his campaign. I know many project managers that handles good projects such as Jamalezaz, bounty detective, and many others most of them are either hero members or legend, I believe they have enough experience to handle it mere considering their ranks, not to say the rank is the only criteria to be a good project manager.i always doubt those project starters with newbie ranks.is it that they decide to use a new forum page,or were the restarting after being hacked or disqualified or how come a new be is handling a project? This are few questions that comes to my mind about newbie managers.
We have to give them chance newbie managers who are just building their reputation will work harder than those established because they want to build and be more competitive than those who are well established, and besides these established managers were one time newbies in this industries.
It doesn't matter what rank handles a project. Done projects opt to have their manager within their team to handle bounties rather than hiring someone from the forum. I've joined some bounties who were handled by their team or new managers and it went out well. Having a project handled by a trusted manager is a plus since they assure that they don't handle scam projects because it will affect their credibility, but it is unavoidable for some to accept a scam project to handle. So, even if it's handle by a trusted manager or new managers or even low ranked managers anything can happen.
Rank is irrelevant to me in deciding which bounty to join. Many of the bounties handled by high rank members tend to end up in a mess and that of newbies are successfully. I do my analysis on the use cases, team experience and others. I have participated on bounties that were handled by high rank members which I am yet to get my reward after one and half year.
actually the ranking in the forum does not determine whether a project is successful or not, I have participated in a bounty managed by a rank coper member but they were successful in developing their project, and their coin price is also quite good, so if you want to join the bounty don't look at the forum rank , but from the seriousness of the team and people inside the project 
I know many project managers that handles good projects such as Jamalezaz, bounty detective, and many others most of them are either hero members or legend, I believe they have enough experience to handle it mere considering their ranks, not to say the rank is the only criteria to be a good project manager.i always doubt those project starters with newbie ranks.is it that they decide to use a new forum page,or were the restarting after being hacked or disqualified or how come a new be is handling a project? This are few questions that comes to my mind about newbie managers.
Honestly, it made me think many times but what's important in every project handled by these newbies still supported by trusted members. That's the most important thing to consider, because in my previous experience with high ranked members they still failed. So there's no exemption here, we just need to trust the platform and wait for the outcome whether it's success or failure. 
Ranks do not mean to guarantee that they are trusted and good bounty manager. Although well, it may influence our perspective on them.
Btw, Bounty detective is also not in Hero or Legendary rank, but they have big communities and have organized or managed many bounties.
However, aside from that, I will prefer to join the bounty campaign managed by trusted, professional, and also experienced bounty managers. Moreover, if it is done by escrow, it will be more guaranteed. And paid in BTC or top coin, it will be more legit.
I know many project managers that handles good projects such as Jamalezaz, bounty detective, ~
You should know the cases by BM Jamalezaz in the past time and this is what I mean. reputation is influenced by their jobs and works, not only by ranks. Btw, Bounty detective is also not in Hero or Legendary rank, but they have big communities and have organized or managed many bounties.
However, aside from that, I will prefer to join the bounty campaign managed by trusted, professional, and also experienced bounty managers. Moreover, if it is done by escrow, it will be more guaranteed. And paid in BTC or top coin, it will be more legit.
Rank is irrelevant to me in deciding which bounty to join. Many of the bounties handled by high rank members tend to end up in a mess and that of newbies are successfully. I do my analysis on the use cases, team experience and others. I have participated on bounties that were handled by high rank members which I am yet to get my reward after one and half year.
~This are few questions that comes to my mind about newbie managers.
This really depends on many thingsBefore joining a bounty, I always pay attention to these two important aspects, first the potential of the project itself and the second is the manager's bounty. If the project is good, supported by many competent partners, the product is clear and functional, I will join even if the bounty manager in charge of it has a low forum ranking.
Meanwhile, a manager's bounty with a good reputation and good rank, good portfolio, fair, will definitely be an option when offering a new bounty. I think they will maintain their quality and reputation by not accepting projects carelessly.
In essence, we must also have a standard and basis of analysis to decide whether to join the bounty or not. And be ready with all the risks.
Judging bounty campaign by the rank of the manager could be misleading and this remind of Gold stablecoin when they started their bounty most people dont want to join cause the bounty was posted by their personal account which is still newbie but I was among the first people to join the project campaign cause I developed my knowledge in knowing genuine project.
Bounty participants need to develop themselves not to rely on bounty manager findings about project and the last time I checked all the bounty manager listed are once a victim of scam project
well, I also saw the bounty manager who initially only had a low rank but he could do his job well and manage the flow of the bounty and everything was neatly arranged so I don't think all bounty managers should be seen from rank but look at the results and from the neatness. Bounty participants need to develop themselves not to rely on bounty manager findings about project and the last time I checked all the bounty manager listed are once a victim of scam project
Jump to: