I don’t know what the conditions are for obtaining a gambling license from Curacao - is it necessary to disclose information about the founders of a legal entity, confirm the authorized capital and similar issues, perhaps it’s enough to just pay for the license. But finding information on the real owners of online casinos (legal entities) is very problematic. Such nuances cause mistrust.
I also noticed that most owners of a casino don't have a solid online presence, but their staff does. Go on LinkedIn or other gambling review sites you see a good number of casino staff available to settle problems relating to their casino. They do that for PR and don't want bad publicity spreading around the internet about the casino. Hence it's very crucial to always look out for casinos who have the interest of their customers at hand whether on the site or outside the site. Like in this forum, there are many representatives ready to solve some allegations placed on their casino, if the player is right they'll work hard to resolve it hence not costing them another client or member who wants to gamble using the casino. Looking for the details of the casino owner on the sites of the license issuer can be cool, but what you'll get there wouldn't be sufficient. Obtaining the license costs some money and time, not every body would be able to get a license to set up a casino.
The current situation with the example you gave about LinkedIn seems strange to me. After all, individuals (casino employees) are more vulnerable to attacks based on social engineering, which in turn give rise to other types of hacker attacks on the final product - online casinos. At the same time, on LinkedIn, the vast majority of companies only indicate the country and, at best, the city in their location. At the same time, the websites of most companies engaged in the field of Crypto/Web3 etc always indicates the full legal address.
I think they'll have to present some funds to show they're capable of paying members, then work on a provably fair feature as a way of signifying transparency and that the house is not manipulating the results way too much. Although some casinos lie about this and don't follow the provably fair rules, players have to look into such features by trying to know if they are losing more often than usual. How do you mean legal entities in a bracket for the real owner of a casino? How does it pose a problem or cause mistrust, I'm not clear on that aspect. But, not knowing the full details of an online casino boss doesn't pose any threat. The law enforcement agency can reach to him if required or need, as he's not hidden, their details are available, but contacting them would be impossible for some casino users like you and me. However, not all of them chose to hide their online presence.
Exactly so, and I described such a situation above. The casino, and therefore the legal entity, the owner of the casino, does not have financial transparency for the end consumer (gambler).