Pages:
Author

Topic: Does playing tennis require a burka? (Read 1282 times)

legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
April 19, 2017, 09:57:13 PM
#27
....

Fuck their silly mind games of calling political correctness.

But I don't agree that in past centuries, marriage to 9 year olds was a problem. Many cultures did this for practical reasons.

I think it's fair to say that it does not work anywhere in the world today, and any case of it's current practice is a bad thing.

May be you are right. 1000 years ago, a 12-year old boy marrying a 9-year old girl would have been normal (but still, what about a 53-year old marrying a 6-year old girl)? Anyway, right now there is no need for nine year olds to get married, as the life expectancy has risen by many times.

Life was short and brutal, the average life being 40 some, and many dying in childhood, or their teens. In many places, people were isolated in small villages, and only once every several years would a gathering of several villages be set up. That was pointedly a time to set marriage partners and this meant organizing it for the children.

Those villages had insufficient genetic diversity to create long term healthy populations.

I could go on but many factors combined to create circumstances favoring such marriages in times very different than today.

As for the 53 year old marrying the 6 year old, that reflects more on concepts of women as property than anything else. Remember, it wasn't just women that were property. When did English common law arise? When were the first concepts of people being their own masters? Etc, etc.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 19, 2017, 08:37:24 PM
#26
Ironically, by making young girls wear burkas they are doing the opposite of what they are intending, they are sexualising children by making them cover up. zzzzz

Their holy books even detail how to have sex with children less than 9 years of age. Search "Mufa'khathat" in google, and you'll know what I mean. But you can't say anything against this practice. They will accuse you of Islamophobia.

https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/12/06/muslims-verify-mufakhathat-islamic-masturbation-and-incest-of-infants/

Fuck their silly mind games of calling political correctness.

But I don't agree that in past centuries, marriage to 9 year olds was a problem. Many cultures did this for practical reasons.

I think it's fair to say that it does not work anywhere in the world today, and any case of it's current practice is a bad thing.

May be you are right. 1000 years ago, a 12-year old boy marrying a 9-year old girl would have been normal (but still, what about a 53-year old marrying a 6-year old girl)? Anyway, right now there is no need for nine year olds to get married, as the life expectancy has risen by many times.
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584
April 19, 2017, 11:54:36 AM
#25
Ironically, by making young girls wear burkas they are doing the opposite of what they are intending, they are sexualising children by making them cover up. zzzzz

Their holy books even detail how to have sex with children less than 9 years of age. Search "Mufa'khathat" in google, and you'll know what I mean. But you can't say anything against this practice. They will accuse you of Islamophobia.

https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/12/06/muslims-verify-mufakhathat-islamic-masturbation-and-incest-of-infants/

Fuck their silly mind games of calling political correctness.

But I don't agree that in past centuries, marriage to 9 year olds was a problem. Many cultures did this for practical reasons.

I think it's fair to say that it does not work anywhere in the world today, and any case of it's current practice is a bad thing.

And this ser, is why Europe is failing. All this political correctness fail to solve their problems. And now the right is back with a vengeance. All those issues they tried to sweep under a rag have come out. The number of natives that are starting to have anti-Islamic, anti-immigration, anti-EU sentiments are increasing. Even if these right-wing candidates fail to land a seat, they've forced these issues out in the open and now politicians can avoid talking about them.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
April 18, 2017, 09:29:54 PM
#24
Ironically, by making young girls wear burkas they are doing the opposite of what they are intending, they are sexualising children by making them cover up. zzzzz

Their holy books even detail how to have sex with children less than 9 years of age. Search "Mufa'khathat" in google, and you'll know what I mean. But you can't say anything against this practice. They will accuse you of Islamophobia.

https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/12/06/muslims-verify-mufakhathat-islamic-masturbation-and-incest-of-infants/

Fuck their silly mind games of calling political correctness.

But I don't agree that in past centuries, marriage to 9 year olds was a problem. Many cultures did this for practical reasons.

I think it's fair to say that it does not work anywhere in the world today, and any case of it's current practice is a bad thing.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 18, 2017, 08:34:09 PM
#23
Ironically, by making young girls wear burkas they are doing the opposite of what they are intending, they are sexualising children by making them cover up. zzzzz

Their holy books even detail how to have sex with children less than 9 years of age. Search "Mufa'khathat" in google, and you'll know what I mean. But you can't say anything against this practice. They will accuse you of Islamophobia.

https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/12/06/muslims-verify-mufakhathat-islamic-masturbation-and-incest-of-infants/
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
April 18, 2017, 06:12:54 PM
#22
Ironically, by making young girls wear burkas they are doing the opposite of what they are intending, they are sexualising children by making them cover up. zzzzz

Lol, and hey, while your at it...

Watch out for those Nikes!

FATWA AGAINST NIKE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVS5R8b1YRI
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
April 18, 2017, 05:33:36 PM
#21
Ironically, by making young girls wear burkas they are doing the opposite of what they are intending, they are sexualising children by making them cover up. zzzzz
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
April 18, 2017, 03:53:39 PM
#20
I dont think burkas, burkinis or hijabs etc are madated at all in islam, its more of a tribal practice that has gotten muddled with the actual religion. 
Whatever the case, the practice is discriminatory towards females, where is the law for men to cover up everything?   

On this subject I find this interesting article.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/saudi-cleric-burqas-babies-article-1.1255335

 A Saudi sheikh has issued a fatwa calling for female babies to wear burqas.

Sheikh Abdullah Daoud, who is not affiliated with the government of Saudi Arabia, made his controversial edict during an interview on the Islamic al-Majd TV that aired six months ago but recently went viral on social networking sites.

According to Daoud, dressing infants and children in the traditional Muslim veils would reduce the sexual molestation of minors, though the cleric did not cite any evidence for his view.

Sheikh Mohammad al-Jzlana, a former judge at the Saudi Board of Grievances, told al-Majd TV that the fatwa was “denigrating to Islam and Shariah and made Islam look bad.”

On Twitter, where the story gained media traction, the response to the idea of covering up baby girls has been almost universally negative.

“It seems there's no shortage of moronic Saudi Mullahs churning out absurd Fatwa's,” Munir Khan, a self-described “Brit Asian of Pakistani heritage,” wrote on Twitter.

Women in Saudi Arabia are required by law to wear the burqa when going out in public. Before girls enter puberty, however, they generally abstain from doing so.

While the Quran dictates that women “draw their outer garments close around themselves” so as to promote modesty, religious scholars disagree on whether a burqa is a compulsory part of Islam.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
April 18, 2017, 03:01:35 PM
#19
I dont think burkas, burkinis or hijabs etc are madated at all in islam, its more of a tribal practice that has gotten muddled with the actual religion. 
Whatever the case, the practice is discriminatory towards females, where is the law for men to cover up everything?   
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
April 18, 2017, 02:53:46 PM
#18
^^^^ The purpose of religion is to give relaxation, hope and compassion for an individual believer. But when you allow religion to dictate your everyday life, then this purpose is lost.

I'm not religious, but doesn't every individual fill in their 'purpose' of religion? I understand (and yes, I do see this as well) that men are dictating how these women should live their every day life, such as wearing a burka.

Do these women see wearing a burka as part of 'who they are and what they believe in'. Like without any men around, would they still wear it?
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584
April 18, 2017, 08:13:34 AM
#17

So, it's a cold winter day, snowing, and the kids want to make snowmen.

Think again....

FATWA AGAINST SNOWMEN!!!

A prominent Saudi Arabian cleric has issued a fatwa banning the
building of snowmen, following rare snowfall in the conservative Muslim
kingdom.
The religious order was issued by Sheikh Mohammed Saleh al-Munajjid, a
former diplomat at the Saudi embassy in Washington, who said the
practice was anti-Islamic.
"Munajjid argued that to build a snowman was to create an image of a
human being, an action considered sinful under the kingdom's strict
interpretation of Sunni Islam,"

Read more at https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fae_1421165400#CddBdfT6YGV2AqK2.99

The desert barbarians don't know what to do with snow. They should have banned Ski Dubai because having snow in the desert is playing God. Next stop, throwing out all fridges and ACs. I wonder if they also banned Frozen. "Do you want to build a snowmaaaan?"




Destroy the Pyramids and Sphinx


http://raymondibrahim.com/2013/01/30/egypt-2012-the-year-in-fatwas/

In November, Sheikh Murjan Salem al-Jawhari, a Salafi leader, called for the destruction of all idols, relics, and statues in Egypt, specifically mentioning the Sphinx and the Great Pyramids.  He called on Muslims to destroy such “idols” just as they destroyed the Buddha statues in Afghanistan. 

I've seen the news when they destroyed the Bamiyan Buddhas, just terrible. They're doing all this to remove all traces of these countries pre-Islamic past. Heck, they even bombed the Borobudur.

Quite frankly, they need to do that. Save for that fuckin pile of sand called the Arabian peninsula, every "Islamic" nation you can think of today used to be populated by people following religions that are still alive (Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, etc). These monuments are reminders that prior to their conquest, people there hold on to a different faith. That prior to Islamic and Arab supremacism, those kuffar "minorties" owned the land.

No wonder they keep bombing the Copts in Egypt, they are basically the true heirs of Egypt. Their language is even closer to (and what was used to decipher) the language used in the hieroglyphs.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 17, 2017, 11:06:13 PM
#16
^^^^ The purpose of religion is to give relaxation, hope and compassion for an individual believer. But when you allow religion to dictate your everyday life, then this purpose is lost.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
April 17, 2017, 10:07:24 PM
#15
Of course, another fatwa orders that any woman swimming in the sea is an adultress.

 fatwas decreed that women who swim in the sea are committing "adultery" -- even if they wear a hijab: "The reason behind this particular fatwa, from their point of view, is that the sea is masculine [as with many other languages, Arabic nouns are gender specific, and "sea" is masculine], and when the water touches the woman's private parts she becomes an 'adulteress' and should be punished."

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4069/egypt-salafi-fatwas

Holy shit these people are completely fucking stupid. Killing them would be doing a favor to the rest of the world.

I won't be bothered if they are stupid and staying in their own nations. But the problem is that in addition to being stupid, they are prone to commit terrorist attacks, and that too in non-Muslim nations. Perhaps the only solution is to round up all of them, and then dump somewhere in the desert.

FATWA BANNING ALL YOU CAN EAT BUFFETS

“All You Can Eat” offers are pretty common in fast food chains in countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE. So why not spoil everyone’s fun (and appetite) by issuing a fatwa to prohibit the Western marketing ploys?

“Whoever enters the buffet and eats for 10 or 50 riyals without deciding the quantity they will eat is violating Sharia (Islamic) law,” claimed Saleh al-Fawzan, a Saudi cleric.

http://scoopempire.com/craziest-fatwas-come-middle-east/

FATWA AGAINST MUSIC

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said today that music is "not compatible" with the values of the Islamic republic, and should not be practised or taught in the country.

legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
April 17, 2017, 08:47:10 PM
#14
Of course, another fatwa orders that any woman swimming in the sea is an adultress.

 fatwas decreed that women who swim in the sea are committing "adultery" -- even if they wear a hijab: "The reason behind this particular fatwa, from their point of view, is that the sea is masculine [as with many other languages, Arabic nouns are gender specific, and "sea" is masculine], and when the water touches the woman's private parts she becomes an 'adulteress' and should be punished."

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4069/egypt-salafi-fatwas

Holy shit these people are completely fucking stupid. Killing them would be doing a favor to the rest of the world.

I won't be bothered if they are stupid and staying in their own nations. But the problem is that in addition to being stupid, they are prone to commit terrorist attacks, and that too in non-Muslim nations. Perhaps the only solution is to round up all of them, and then dump somewhere in the desert.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 501
April 17, 2017, 05:05:26 PM
#13
It is a pretty funny thing, these all incidents with burkas all over the Europe.
For some reason, there is "tolerance" in Europe, but it only works in one way. We are being intolerate to muslims, because our womens do not wear burkas on the streets.
They show their faces to others, same with bodies, because in our culture, this is a common thing.

But they are not intolerate, for not respecting our habits and traditions. We need to conform to them for some reason, but if they have traveled here, then why we should do this, instead of them?

Im afraid that immigrant crisis will only make things worse from now on, anyway I really hope that we will see some solution from the EU parliament.
 
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1027
April 17, 2017, 02:01:18 PM
#12
Yes if your a Muslim you do require a burka if playing tennis..
It make tennis funny Cheesy.

And i be betting that a women in a burka will never win a game Cheesy  " Professional "

TURKEY as just made all this MUSLIM stuff 1 MILLION times worse ..

South korea needs a NUKE BOMB
JAPAN needs one
The EU needs one

EVERYONE NEEDS TO BUILD NUKES ..EVERYONE..
If you not got one your finished..

We have let DICTATORS BUILD A NUKE BOMB .I.E NORTH KOREA..
If he has them i suggest you get them too..

The leaders of this planet have got to be the WORST EVER LEADERS..
For letting NORTH KOREA BUILD A BOMB.

And i hope you have removed them from this nation?..

US nuclear weapons in Turkey: How safe are they? - CNNPolitics.com
www.cnn.com/2016/07/19/politics/us-nuclear-weapons-turkey-attempted-coup/
19 Jul 2016 - As Turkey deals with the fallout of a failed coup, the country's ... have raised questions about the safety of US nuclear weapons stationed there.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
April 17, 2017, 01:51:19 PM
#11
Of course, another fatwa orders that any woman swimming in the sea is an adultress.

 fatwas decreed that women who swim in the sea are committing "adultery" -- even if they wear a hijab: "The reason behind this particular fatwa, from their point of view, is that the sea is masculine [as with many other languages, Arabic nouns are gender specific, and "sea" is masculine], and when the water touches the woman's private parts she becomes an 'adulteress' and should be punished."

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4069/egypt-salafi-fatwas

Holy shit these people are completely fucking stupid. Killing them would be doing a favor to the rest of the world.

Destroy the Pyramids and Sphinx


http://raymondibrahim.com/2013/01/30/egypt-2012-the-year-in-fatwas/

In November, Sheikh Murjan Salem al-Jawhari, a Salafi leader, called for the destruction of all idols, relics, and statues in Egypt, specifically mentioning the Sphinx and the Great Pyramids.  He called on Muslims to destroy such “idols” just as they destroyed the Buddha statues in Afghanistan. 
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1005
My mule don't like people laughing
April 17, 2017, 12:56:09 PM
#10
Of course, another fatwa orders that any woman swimming in the sea is an adultress.

 fatwas decreed that women who swim in the sea are committing "adultery" -- even if they wear a hijab: "The reason behind this particular fatwa, from their point of view, is that the sea is masculine [as with many other languages, Arabic nouns are gender specific, and "sea" is masculine], and when the water touches the woman's private parts she becomes an 'adulteress' and should be punished."

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4069/egypt-salafi-fatwas

Holy shit these people are completely fucking stupid. Killing them would be doing a favor to the rest of the world.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
April 17, 2017, 12:39:03 PM
#9

Was actually surprising she didn't feel threatened. Would have been different if it was in a different country. I mean, even Muslim politicians in Afghanistan who are asking for moderation get assassinated - to the people's approval. Guess she's lucky she's in India.

I can just imagine how uncomfortable it would be to play with a full body suit on. I imagine she would have been asked to wear something similar to a burkini. Of course except it would be wet from sweat rather than water.

Lol. Most sports clothing is engineered for max human performance today. Going RETRO-BURKA-MODE would have meant just one thing, that she would have lost the competitions.

Looking into the matter a bit closer, I find that this woman really does have some rather amazing honkers. She is positively endowed with let us say, headlights.

See this picture.

https://cosmicstories.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/my-list-of-top-ten-islamic-fatwas-1/

LOL. That photo though. Went right through Grin

I read the fatwas, they're all really crazy. Good to know that even Muslims find them ridiculous. At least this is the advantage of internet and media. Everyone would know how crazy these people are and open them to the ridicule they deserve.


Despite all those treats from the radical Islamists, she married a Pakistani (for an Indian, that is very uncomfortable choice). After the marriage however, the protests against her short clothes stopped.

Maybe the Muslims criticizing her were doing that because she's Indian? When she married a Pakistani (which I also assume is Muslim) there's really not much they can say about her.

Of course, another fatwa orders that any woman swimming in the sea is an adultress.

 fatwas decreed that women who swim in the sea are committing "adultery" -- even if they wear a hijab: "The reason behind this particular fatwa, from their point of view, is that the sea is masculine [as with many other languages, Arabic nouns are gender specific, and "sea" is masculine], and when the water touches the woman's private parts she becomes an 'adulteress' and should be punished."

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4069/egypt-salafi-fatwas

LOL then they should kill every man that swims in the sea because that's basically sodomy. And we all know how they love their gays...

There were many objections raised when Sania was wearing skirts while playing tennis and it became such a big controversy back then. But then these kind of issues are raised even today where a Muslim TV actress was bashed for wearing sindoor (that's a Hindu tradition for married women). India being a secular country, nobody can be arrested for such issues but these kind of reports still keep happening which is sad. It's not what happens only with Muslims, even Hindus are targetted for even talking about their own God.

True. At least she wasn't targeted for killing. Like these poor unfortunates...

https://www.endtime.com/prophecy-news/islamic-state-issues-fatwa-against-children-with-down-syndrome-murders-38-disabled-infants/

According to the Iraqi activist blog Mosul Eye, sharia judges have ruled that ISIS followers are authorized to kill infants with Down Syndrome or congenital deformities. Already since the religious decree (fatwa) was issued, militants have killed at least 38 children between one week and three months old by lethal injection or suffocation.

In a post on the Mosul Eye Facebook page, the group claims that any child with a disability is now at risk of being killed, and released a brief video showing disabled children. The killings reportedly took place in ISIS strongholds in Syria and Mosul, the northern Iraqi city seized by ISIS in June 2014.

Mosul Eye claims to report directly from Mosul, and has reliably reported on Islamic State incidents in the past. It has been called “one of most accurate chronicles of life under Islamic State rule.”

The group says it has monitored the deaths of several children with Down Syndrome and congenital deformities. They learned of an “Oral Fatwa” issued by the sharia board of the Islamic State authorizing its members to “kill newborn babies with Down’s [sic] Syndrome and congenital deformities and disabled children.”

Now this is just depressing. And to believe there are still people who try to defend them. They are monsters, only monsters would be able to stomach committing such cruelty.

So, it's a cold winter day, snowing, and the kids want to make snowmen.

Think again....

FATWA AGAINST SNOWMEN!!!

A prominent Saudi Arabian cleric has issued a fatwa banning the
building of snowmen, following rare snowfall in the conservative Muslim
kingdom.
The religious order was issued by Sheikh Mohammed Saleh al-Munajjid, a
former diplomat at the Saudi embassy in Washington, who said the
practice was anti-Islamic.
"Munajjid argued that to build a snowman was to create an image of a
human being, an action considered sinful under the kingdom's strict
interpretation of Sunni Islam,"

Read more at https://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fae_1421165400#CddBdfT6YGV2AqK2.99
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584
April 17, 2017, 10:12:40 AM
#8

Was actually surprising she didn't feel threatened. Would have been different if it was in a different country. I mean, even Muslim politicians in Afghanistan who are asking for moderation get assassinated - to the people's approval. Guess she's lucky she's in India.

I can just imagine how uncomfortable it would be to play with a full body suit on. I imagine she would have been asked to wear something similar to a burkini. Of course except it would be wet from sweat rather than water.

Lol. Most sports clothing is engineered for max human performance today. Going RETRO-BURKA-MODE would have meant just one thing, that she would have lost the competitions.

Looking into the matter a bit closer, I find that this woman really does have some rather amazing honkers. She is positively endowed with let us say, headlights.

See this picture.

https://cosmicstories.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/my-list-of-top-ten-islamic-fatwas-1/

LOL. That photo though. Went right through Grin

I read the fatwas, they're all really crazy. Good to know that even Muslims find them ridiculous. At least this is the advantage of internet and media. Everyone would know how crazy these people are and open them to the ridicule they deserve.


Despite all those treats from the radical Islamists, she married a Pakistani (for an Indian, that is very uncomfortable choice). After the marriage however, the protests against her short clothes stopped.

Maybe the Muslims criticizing her were doing that because she's Indian? When she married a Pakistani (which I also assume is Muslim) there's really not much they can say about her.

Of course, another fatwa orders that any woman swimming in the sea is an adultress.

 fatwas decreed that women who swim in the sea are committing "adultery" -- even if they wear a hijab: "The reason behind this particular fatwa, from their point of view, is that the sea is masculine [as with many other languages, Arabic nouns are gender specific, and "sea" is masculine], and when the water touches the woman's private parts she becomes an 'adulteress' and should be punished."

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4069/egypt-salafi-fatwas

LOL then they should kill every man that swims in the sea because that's basically sodomy. And we all know how they love their gays...

There were many objections raised when Sania was wearing skirts while playing tennis and it became such a big controversy back then. But then these kind of issues are raised even today where a Muslim TV actress was bashed for wearing sindoor (that's a Hindu tradition for married women). India being a secular country, nobody can be arrested for such issues but these kind of reports still keep happening which is sad. It's not what happens only with Muslims, even Hindus are targetted for even talking about their own God.

True. At least she wasn't targeted for killing. Like these poor unfortunates...

https://www.endtime.com/prophecy-news/islamic-state-issues-fatwa-against-children-with-down-syndrome-murders-38-disabled-infants/

According to the Iraqi activist blog Mosul Eye, sharia judges have ruled that ISIS followers are authorized to kill infants with Down Syndrome or congenital deformities. Already since the religious decree (fatwa) was issued, militants have killed at least 38 children between one week and three months old by lethal injection or suffocation.

In a post on the Mosul Eye Facebook page, the group claims that any child with a disability is now at risk of being killed, and released a brief video showing disabled children. The killings reportedly took place in ISIS strongholds in Syria and Mosul, the northern Iraqi city seized by ISIS in June 2014.

Mosul Eye claims to report directly from Mosul, and has reliably reported on Islamic State incidents in the past. It has been called “one of most accurate chronicles of life under Islamic State rule.”

The group says it has monitored the deaths of several children with Down Syndrome and congenital deformities. They learned of an “Oral Fatwa” issued by the sharia board of the Islamic State authorizing its members to “kill newborn babies with Down’s [sic] Syndrome and congenital deformities and disabled children.”

Now this is just depressing. And to believe there are still people who try to defend them. They are monsters, only monsters would be able to stomach committing such cruelty.
Pages:
Jump to: