Author

Topic: Doing some work for Saxydev, Earned $90 but Never received the Payment.  (Read 1086 times)

legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Heads-up:

Rizzrack / shitcoincollector12's friend & protégé has returned:

Also gazetabitcoin aka @newsletterbitcoin scammed his mom and sued her for 50$. I am not allowed to post links but DM and for sure I will send his real name Smiley to check the case of course

Most likely, not for paying back his debts to c0ldbrewz and dkbit98.

Obviously, the above post was reported for being off-topic and zero-value and it will be deleted soon.
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 5
Thank you for bringing us back on track, I've been curious as well. Last we know was that Saxydev entrusted all the payment proofs to someone he trust via PM to preserve his identity, despite FatFork explained several times that there will be no way to trace his ID throught the said proofs
I am not giving up just yet.
Maybe we can still track this guy and stop him from scamming other people.

No update  Grin ,
already give up about the money the moment i created the Flag  Smiley
Is it ok for you to send me a PM with your Monero public address so I can confirm that address didn't receive any coins so far, and you can also tell me what wallet exactly you used?
If you want, you can send me all other information you have from Saxydev, including all his accounts in different platforms or email addresses.

PS
I won't reveal any of your informationin public if you don't want that.

sure, PM sent 
but all info including my monero address already on page 1 i think  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
Thank you for bringing us back on track, I've been curious as well. Last we know was that Saxydev entrusted all the payment proofs to someone he trust via PM to preserve his identity, despite FatFork explained several times that there will be no way to trace his ID throught the said proofs
I am not giving up just yet.
Maybe we can still track this guy and stop him from scamming other people.

No update  Grin ,
already give up about the money the moment i created the Flag  Smiley
Is it ok for you to send me a PM with your Monero public address so I can confirm that address didn't receive any coins so far, and you can also tell me what wallet exactly you used?
If you want, you can send me all other information you have from Saxydev, including all his accounts in different platforms or email addresses.

PS
I won't reveal any of your informationin public if you don't want that.
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 5
[...]
And sup* holydarkness!

[...]



TIL: the emoji is made from simple characters, I just realized it today


[...]
Let's get back on topic, does anyone know what happened with c0ldbrewz and his Monero payment from Saxydev?
---

---

---

OP, c0ldbrewz, can you update us on something from your side?

No update  Grin ,
already give up about the money the moment i created the Flag  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1462
Yes, I'm an asshole
[...]
And sup* holydarkness!

[...]



TIL: the emoji is made from simple characters, I just realized it today


[...]
Let's get back on topic, does anyone know what happened with c0ldbrewz and his Monero payment from Saxydev?

Thank you for bringing us back on track, I've been curious as well. Last we know was that Saxydev entrusted all the payment proofs to someone he trust via PM to preserve his identity, despite FatFork explained several times that there will be no way to trace his ID throught the said proofs

wow. really wow. sent pm to someone i trust from the forum with the details, he can confirm or not, depends if he wants to get involved in this thread. up to him. locally i don't store the key any more, but i had the intuition to restore the drive to get it back a few weeks ago and got it saved.

Unfortunately, this "someone" left us on a quite gargantuan range. IMO, it could be anyone, literally anyone, from someone that he found by opening "search members" page on this forum, closed his eyes and type randomly, and deemed the result shown as that "someone" he trust, to someone whose last activity was before covid and has long left the forum, to a legit trusted members on this forum who still active. It would really helpful if Saxydev at least told us the username, so we can check if they're still an active user or not --with the decision on the interest of getting involved on this case by verifying it is still on the hand of the user, which we shall respect-- unfortunately he didn't hand us that info.

Given that Saxydev online activity on this forum getting less and less by time, the best way we can get an update for this case is by asking OP if he has recently refreshed or looked at his wallet and happen to see the said payment.

OP, c0ldbrewz, can you update us on something from your side?
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
Did anyone realize Rizzrack finally withdrew his opposition towards dkbit98's flag? I wonder why and what changed his mind.
Anyone can do whatever they want with flags, support or oppose and they don't have to give any explanation at all.
Some people learned the hard way when I warned them about scammers, and maybe they can find the truth only after they personally got burned.
It was funny to me that some people thought I was not serious about my deal with Saxydev, but I was serious and he did break a deal.

Let's get back on topic, does anyone know what happened with c0ldbrewz and his Monero payment from Saxydev?



legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
@FatFork and NeuroticFish: I believe that shitcoincollector12 (and, most likely, saxydev too) will consider you now as groupies as well Roll Eyes
I'm totally ok to be a groupie of you, FatFork and NeuroticFish.  Wink
I'm on board with that! Just tell me where to put my John Hancock.  Cheesy

Hey gang! Smiley



[...]

And sup* holydarkness!

Hmm... I think their relationship didn't work out. "It's not you baby, it's me. I just can't see you suffer like this anymore. We have to end it."

[dramatic pause]

This is so touching... I almost leaked a tear  Cry

Did anyone realize Rizzrack finally withdrew his opposition towards dkbit98's flag? I wonder why and what changed his mind.

Good catch, holydarkness! Most likely, our not-so-friendly-forum-staff-member-which-supports-scammers tries to lure public opinion from his shady activities. It is also possible that he started to be aware of the shit he got himself into (as you could notice, he also stopped posting from his alt account) and, since for the negative feedback I gave him I used the link the the flag which he opposed, the thought that by not opposing the flag those reading the negative feedback (and the reference link) may believe that the feedback was not fair. However, I just changed the reference link from that negative feedback with a link of the screenshot showing him opposing the flag, thus his move was in vain.

Another possibility is that, after he sent me that unsolicited PM, becoming a staff user breaking forum rules while still being paid for doing that; and after I reported his unsolicited PM -- after all these it's possible for an admin or for his own master to have a discussion with him and explain him that his actions are embarrassing for the forum. In this case, again, he had to take the difficult decision of not supporting his scammer friend anymore (which probably broke his heart; yet, he had to obey).

More over, bear in mind that he only stopped opposing the flag, without supporting it so it's a clear sign that either he was forced to take this decision or he only took it for people to not see anymore (at the negative feedback reference link) that he was supporting a scammer. In any case, the current reference link for his support of a scammer is still showing his earlier action and I also included this topic's URL in the comment for the negative feedback, ensuring that everything is transparent.

*For those unaware, the appellation "sup" has deep roots between me and holydarkness, from an era when examplens exposed the "sup fellas" spammers gang (the gang was defeated fast) Smiley Since then, we occasionally use to greet each other with this "sup" Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1462
Yes, I'm an asshole
[...]
Rizzrack must be so proud about his protégé. [...¡

Hmm... I think their relationship didn't work out. "It's not you baby, it's me. I just can't see you suffer like this anymore. We have to end it."

[dramatic pause]

Did anyone realize Rizzrack finally withdrew his opposition towards dkbit98's flag? I wonder why and what changed his mind.










("Soon" meaning any interval of time, including eons, as time is, after all, relative. To understand time relativity better think about this: the length of 1 minute varies based on which side of the bathroom door you are situated Smiley If you are outside of it, waiting to get in, that "1 minute and I'm out" may feel like 1000 years).

I LOLed so much at this that it worth to be quoted.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino

@FatFork and NeuroticFish: I believe that shitcoincollector12 (and, most likely, saxydev too) will consider you now as groupies as well Roll Eyes
I'm totally ok to be a groupie of you, FatFork and NeuroticFish.  Wink
Maybe it's a new gang of Bitcointalk but I can confirm that I've not signed any official declaration to join such a group.  Cheesy

I'm on board with that! Just tell me where to put my John Hancock.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 6947
Currently not much available - see my websitelink
I did the same. Looks like the mods caught it and deleted the troll's post and all the off-topic comments.

Lol, I did the same as well. I did it before knowing you or NeuroticFish also reported those posts. However, I reported them for "off-topic, zero-vale posts", not for trolling, yet I believe trolling was a better reason to state within the report. I was also surprised to see that his topic was also vanished. I did not report the topic, as I thought there are small chances to have it trashed as well, yet it happened (thanks to you and NeuroticFish). I reported only the posts from those screenshots.

Nice stats, so many posts deleted by moderators...



I'm somehow missing our old trust scores... 16, 32, 64, 128 negative trust.  Tongue



https://bpip.org/Profile?id=3410716



except ScamVirus and sashan, they are all your friends with whom you are praising each other, every time you have an opportunity. And that's a fact, public on the forum.
Obviously, we are a gang.
GazetaBitcoin's groupie 1miau

@FatFork and NeuroticFish: I believe that shitcoincollector12 (and, most likely, saxydev too) will consider you now as groupies as well Roll Eyes
I'm totally ok to be a groupie of you, FatFork and NeuroticFish.  Wink
Maybe it's a new gang of Bitcointalk but I can confirm that I've not signed any official declaration to join such a group.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
I did the same. Looks like the mods caught it and deleted the troll's post and all the off-topic comments.

Lol, I did the same as well. I did it before knowing you or NeuroticFish also reported those posts. However, I reported them for "off-topic, zero-vale posts", not for trolling, yet I believe trolling was a better reason to state within the report. I was also surprised to see that his topic was also vanished. I did not report the topic, as I thought there are small chances to have it trashed as well, yet it happened (thanks to you and NeuroticFish). I reported only the posts from those screenshots.



except ScamVirus and sashan, they are all your friends with whom you are praising each other, every time you have an opportunity. And that's a fact, public on the forum.
Obviously, we are a gang.
GazetaBitcoin's groupie 1miau

@FatFork and NeuroticFish: I believe that shitcoincollector12 (and, most likely, saxydev too) will consider you now as groupies as well Roll Eyes



from what I'm seing having a beef with GazetaBitcoin is enough enough to be marked as a scammer and Trust to be nuked
Thus the reason I'm posting from an alt account since I'm 100% sure that I'll be painted red, or the least neutral for even blinking at you

In Romanian we have a saying: the mouth of the sinner speaks the Truth. Basically it refers to those situations where someone which is not considered to be credible says, sometime, some words which become true or are true. It seems that shitcoincollector12 was right when he said that. Probably he anticipated he won't be able to control himself and he will say things which will bring him some red tags (which, eventually, happened).
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
I did the same. Looks like the mods caught it and deleted the troll's post and all the off-topic comments.

I get it that it's important not to give trolls too much attention, but it's always a good idea to report any behavior that violates the platform's guidelines, including trolling or harassment. This helps to maintain a safe and respectful environment for all members. I'm glad the mods share the same perspective.

Thank you.
From what I've seen I think that the account was not banned (not even temp ban), still, removing that garbage is an obvious step forward.
So I'll add my "thank you" to the mods too.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
I am truly sorry for him.

I'm not. I've reported that for trolling, because, although he might have been drunk or high when he has done that, it's not even funny and .. it's still trolling.
However, I know that trolling is more often ignored than getting handled, but we'll see...

I did the same. Looks like the mods caught it and deleted the troll's post and all the off-topic comments.

I get it that it's important not to give trolls too much attention, but it's always a good idea to report any behavior that violates the platform's guidelines, including trolling or harassment. This helps to maintain a safe and respectful environment for all members. I'm glad the mods share the same perspective.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
I am truly sorry for him.

I'm not. I've reported that for trolling, because, although he might have been drunk or high when he has done that, it's not even funny and .. it's still trolling.
However, I know that trolling is more often ignored than getting handled, but we'll see...
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
It seems he wanted to hire you as a gay prostitute and was disappointed by your refusal to perform certain sex acts and/or certain parts of your body not being quite to his liking. Or something like that? Yeah, I don't quite get it either.

I am truly sorry for him. It's not that I am not into this kind of stuff -- I am! But only inside a very select circle, where he does not belong

(Actually, I am training "hard" on this matter, for our close-toc-ome celebration, but don't let anybody else know that :p -- especially fillippone!)
legendary
Activity: 4536
Merit: 3188
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
So excepting the topic from Scam accusation board, where I am being accused of... I don't even know what, as the topic is written in most illiterate English ever
It seems he wanted to hire you as a gay prostitute and was disappointed by your refusal to perform certain sex acts and/or certain parts of your body not being quite to his liking. Or something like that? Yeah, I don't quite get it either.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
This clown turned everything into circus show with his recent posts, fake scam accusations, personal insults

Rizzrack must be so proud about his protégé. Actually, he felt so proud that he even sent me an unsolicited PM, breaking the rules of the very forum which pays him, and risking a temp-ban now. Oh, what a life, what a life...

So excepting the topic from Scam accusation board, where I am being accused of... I don't even know what, as the topic is written in most illiterate English ever -- so excepting that, Rizzrack's protégé started stalking my posts now.





Meanwhile, someone told me that saxydev scammed him with about 5-600 euros or so. I instructed him how to create a scam accusation topic and a flag and also instructed him to add all chat logs and screenshots which can be considered as evidence. So it's possible to see soon a new accusation about Rizzrack's protégé. At least, thus guy was not naive and he said that he knows he has no chance in obtaining any of his money back.



but you still haven't provided any valid proof of payment, neither publicly nor in a private message to a trusted DT member.

Be patient, FatFork, the problem is being taking care of by his "financial department". It will be solved soon.

("Soon" meaning any interval of time, including eons, as time is, after all, relative. To understand time relativity better think about this: the length of 1 minute varies based on which side of the bathroom door you are situated Smiley If you are outside of it, waiting to get in, that "1 minute and I'm out" may feel like 1000 years).
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
but you still haven't provided any valid proof of payment, neither publicly nor in a private message to a trusted DT member.
You can clearly see this guy has some kind of mental illness that creates a lot of vulgar insults, lies and stupid posts, so I think it's time for moderators to react and clean the junk.
This clown turned everything into circus show with his recent posts, fake scam accusations, personal insults and he didn't provide a single proof of payment.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
For someone who worked 1 hour, and not even worth 50$,  i agreed and paid 90$. But he  is not able to use an wallet.. loooollll
nice accustian, cmon little devil.


Saxydev, we had a discussion about your supposed payment a few weeks ago, but you still haven't provided any valid proof of payment, neither publicly nor in a private message to a trusted DT member.

The information and screenshots provided previously do not match, particularly the block number of the transaction does not match the time stamp. To prove a payment on the Monero network, the only valid method is to provide the correct TXID and TX secret key. As I have mentioned repeatedly, these details do not disclose any information about the sender (you), but only the recipient address and amount sent. Therefore, there is no privacy concern in sharing this information publicly.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
And like I've already said Mr. shit for brains, I'm not an alt of Rizzrack

How many times should I teel you that I don't give a flying fuck about who you are? Read this 100 times until your peanut balls brain understands:

In any case, no matter if coincollector12is his alt or not
Do you understand this? It does not matter if you are his alt or not.



You make fake and baseless acussations

You are accusing me of extortion and blackmailing yet you say I make baseless accusations? Jesus!

literally the only reason you're saying I'm Rizzrack is cause I didn't agree with your shit reasoning and since he didn't also

...combined with the fact that you both are online at same hour, offline at same hour, reply just one after the other, say same shit, think the same, both support a scammer so yeah that's the only reason. Oh, wait, there are more reasons...

I must be supporting scammers

Actually you are supporting the scammer named saxydev, otherwise you wouldn't wrote that shit post you wrote in the other thread.

You're everything that's wrong with this forum

Lol, yeah! Of course I am everything that's wrong with this forum. Hoooray, finally someone found out all that is wrong with the forum! Now ask theymos for a raise from the other account.

shitty groupie,  AND YOU ARE INFACT SUPPORTING EXTORTIONS AND BLACKMAILERS !

Obviously, how else?! Of course, you have no reference for any of these but it can;t be else, can it?



You are so lucky Lauda is not here anymore... is she were still around you'd be saying this prayer 10 times a day to make her forget all the shit you eat:

Official way to worship me:
Quote
The Queen of Cats guides us. The Queen of Cats teaches us. The Queen of Cats protects us. In your light we thrive. In your mercy we are sheltered. In your wisdom we are humbled. We live only to serve. Our lives are yours.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 1
snip

And like I've already said Mr. shit for brains, I'm not an alt of Rizzrack, and I gave you a way to prove it, I'm not trying to dox you,  you can send your mom, your cousin or whoever the fck you want, I am only willing to dox myself to prove the amount of shit for brains you have.  You make fake and baseless acussations, literally the only reason you're saying I'm Rizzrack is cause I didn't agree with your shit reasoning and since he didn't also, boom, that makes sense, I must be his alt, I must be supporting scammers etc etc.

You're everything that's wrong with this forum, a "white knight" who's moral compass is so offtrack it's actually disgusting, you're just a shitty groupie,  AND YOU ARE INFACT SUPPORTING EXTORTIONS AND BLACKMAILERS !

And I agree with yahoo, please go ahead and create a reputation thread with your evidence that I'm Rizzrack and lets not derail this thread any longer.

legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
You throw around pretty loaded words.

Most likely, more will follow. They are merely expressing your pathetic actions, which endanger users of this forum by seeing you supporting scammers, abusing merit by meriting your alt and trying to doxx users. Of course, doing all these while theymos pays you.

I don't know and really don't care who coincollector12 is.

Oh, thank God you cleared that up!

Don't care much about your opinion

Feeling is mutual.

Supporting the flag c0ldbrewz made does not seem relevant to anyone apparently.

You must be really retarded.



As far as I see, supporting the flag c0ldbrewz made is relevant for 12 users, including you. Are you that imbecile to not even remember that you supported the flag?

If opposing the flag dkbit made against saxydev, related solely to that bet [...]

First of all, it was not a bet. It was a deal, an accepted proposal , which makes it a written agreement. No matter how many times you will try to lie about that, I will always post this to refresh your memory:

Let me make you an offer, if I post a proof for a free service like I said you will pay me 0.1 BTC, I think this is fair offer for a guy who is so active businessman like you.
Deal. Let's see

Where do you see anything about any bet?


[...] makes me a scam supporter

Of course it does.

than that should say more about you than it does about me

Lol, how can that be? So you support scammers and this says more about me than you. Says what about me? That I exposed you for what a piece of shit you are?

You for example: there were cases where I did agree with what you said

Let me put this straight: we never agreed. On anything.

Maybe excepting this:

Let's agree to disagree... as always

So to see, once more, what a liar you are: you emphasized yourself that we always disagree, then you say there were cases where we agreed? Lol!
We could not even be put in place of agreeing anything! Have you noticed that I never respond to your replies (excepting here)? You are merely an ulcer on the belly of a mosquito which I mostly ignore, since you are full of shit.

And let me expose you once more time for what a pathetic liar you are:

welcome to the ignore list. Get comfortable ! It's gonna be a while  Roll Eyes

I was just preparing to get comfy inside your welcoming ignore list. Yet you are replying to me. Either you are a magician and still see what ignored users write or you just lied again. Oh no!



Now let me answer to the post you made from your alt account.

Don't worry I'll make sure to address every word and punctuation you've pointed my way.

Oh, damn, I always forget that you are a liar and unable to keep your words... All good, you still did not answer some questions I asked you since January 27th.

[...]

Have you ever heard about quoting only relevant parts from an earlier post? And not quote wall of texts like a shitposter which you are? Better read this topic: [TIPS] to avoid pyramid quotes (for Newbies). Sadly, that topic is addressed to newbies which don't know how to use quotes, not to shitposters which quote walls of text on purpose.

Addressing the negative feedback I gave you, even if it doesn't have any impact on your profile since I'm not on DT,  it is 100% accurate, since you support someone who tryed to blackmail and extort another user [...]

First of all I was not even active here when all those happened. But I read objectively and I realized there was no extortion nor any blackmailing. I asked you some questions in my earlier post which, of course, you ignored. But let me repeat them to you:

If that was an extortion or a blackmailing, then Lauda were banned. Yet this did not happen. Why, dipshit? Would you answer why? Let me tell you, because you are just a piece of shit throwing buzzwords around, for impressing those naively reading just your posts and not the entire context: Lauda was never banned for extortion / blackmailing because there was no extortion nor any blackmailing involved.

All that happened was that Lauda was demoted from moderator position, as the way she acted -- meaning this sting operation -- was certainly not a good nor a wise thing to do. Yet, if theymos would have considered her an extortioner or blackmailer, he would have banned her since then. So stop throwing buzzwords around!

5. Furthermore, TMAN was also never banned for extortion / blackmailing (highlight is mine):

there was no blackmail - have you read the PGP message? if you had you wouldn't be in here. this is an assault from QS a proven scammer against Lauda I happened to of been involved as I was the one who bought the suspicious activity to light.

no extortion was taking place - it was an intel gathering exercise that backfired.

that is of little consequence now as all the evidence is in Place - I am awaiting return contact from moderators to discuss

Why was that? Again, because there was no extortion / blackmailing.

6. Even furthermore:

proof above - if lauda was extorting for money then where is the payment address?

[...]

there is no feedback from any reputable DT user stating anything about any kind of extortion / blackmail. Again, how can you explain that?

I'd go even further but I know it's for nothing, as you don't read anything and simply show up here to eat some more shit.

Like I said, you're simply turning things how they sim fit with your little stories to bring you in a good light. Kind of wild that some years ago you were suggesting an IRL meet up for bitcointalk members !?

Probably you have way much free time since you manage to lurk through posts made more than 3 years ago. Back then I was only 1 month active on the forum and it seemed a nice idea to have a meeting with those interested, for celebrating 15 years since the forum started. Unlike you, I wasn't trying to doxx anybody. If you go to a meet-up on any subject (Bitcoin included), you must know there are many individuals gathering there and having fun. This is the main subject here: having fun. But you can't understand this, since for you fun means doxxing people and supporting scammers. Or, as you proved recently, to derail threads with your useless shitposts.



I feel like you guys have gone way off topic and should make a thread in reputation board or something. This thread is not meant for your back and forth, it's about saxydev and his unwillingness to pay his workers. Let's keep on topic please.

The subjects are connected: while saxydev proved himself a true scammer, by scamming 3 users in less than a month, Rizzrack encourages scammers, being paid for doing that; points the finger at me, the one which exposed the scammer; derails 1miau;s thread from his alt account; makes doxxing attemps; lies about everything; abuses merits by meriting himself; yet users are supposed to trust this scumbag for helping them recovering their accounts. LOL! Big LOL!
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 4554
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
I feel like you guys have gone way off topic and should make a thread in reputation board or something. This thread is not meant for your back and forth, it's about saxydev and his unwillingness to pay his workers. Let's keep on topic please.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 1

Where did you take all ideas from? About harassment and extortion?

In case you are referring to Lauda, I just said that all she did good for this forum is what you'll never do from 10 alt accounts in 10 years from now on. All the scammers she exposed...!

Then, of course, without knowing anything, you simply throw buzzwords around. But, for the sake of showing what a piece of shit you are I will lose some time now and debunk also this statement of yours:

1. Probably you saw the topic Lauda/TMAN extortion attempt and, without reading anything from it, you start to stirr the shit, without realizing that all you do is simply covering yourself in shit.

2. Of course, you also did not read the archived topic mentioned in the OP of the thread linked by me above: https://archive.is/szqRf#selection-501.0-501.70. Meaning the one used as a basis for accusation.

3. If you actually search for that topic inside the forum, you'll see that liar Zeroxal deleted his accusation and moved the topic to Archive board, for making sure nobody ever finds it again: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/tbc-1759607. Yet I found it.

4. Of course, you also never cared for reading Lauda's signed message, explaining what that shit was all about. To be more precise, it was a sting operation and in no way an extortion attempt.

If that was an extortion or a blackmailing, then Lauda were banned. Yet this did not happen. Why, dipshit? Would you answer why? Let me tell you, because you are just a piece of shit throwing buzzwords around, for impressing those naively reading just your posts and not the entire context: Lauda was never banned for extortion / blackmailing because there was no extortion nor any blackmailing involved.

All that happened was that Lauda was demoted from moderator position, as the way she acted -- meaning this sting operation -- was certainly not a good nor a wise thing to do. Yet, if theymos would have considered her an extortioner or blackmailer, he would have banned her since then. So stop throwing buzzwords around!

5. Furthermore, TMAN was also never banned for extortion / blackmailing (highlight is mine):

there was no blackmail - have you read the PGP message? if you had you wouldn't be in here. this is an assault from QS a proven scammer against Lauda I happened to of been involved as I was the one who bought the suspicious activity to light.

no extortion was taking place - it was an intel gathering exercise that backfired.

that is of little consequence now as all the evidence is in Place - I am awaiting return contact from moderators to discuss

Why was that? Again, because there was no extortion / blackmailing.

6. Even furthermore:

proof above - if lauda was extorting for money then where is the payment address?

7. Lauda's profile shows a Marketplace Trust score of +35 / =17 / -6. That's more positive Trust than you'll have in your life. From those 6 negative feedbacks, 3 are related to her vanishing.

Besides, by reading all feedbacks she ever received, there is no feedback from any reputable DT user stating anything about any kind of extortion / blackmail. Again, how can you explain that?

I'd go even further but I know it's for nothing, as you don't read anything and simply show up here to eat some more shit.

Still funny as heck though, seems I got a negative trust rating from the newsletter guy also, thus proving my point, why posting from an alt account.  But go ahead though, tell me more how he's not abusing the trust system however fits his teenage girl dramas.

The negative feedback is justified by your doxxing-oriented actions. Such actions make me not trust you at all regarding any possible kind of deal and I wrote that in the feedback. This is what Marketplace Trust was implemented for. On the other side, you don't understand anything from this system, thus you wrote me a retaliatory feedback which only proves how imbecile you are. You acted just like saxydev or other morons, which react with retaliatory feedbacks (without understanding that (1) their feedbacks are not even show on someone's profile, as they are only shown at Untrusted feedback section; (2) their feedbacks have zero value). Now this is Trust abuse and misuse of Marketplace Trust system -- meaning to write retaliatory feedbacks.



Addressing the negative feedback I gave you, even if it doesn't have any impact on your profile since I'm not on DT,  it is 100% accurate, since you support someone who tryed to blackmail and extort another user here based on NOTHING, some "investigation" Lauda took it upon herself to hold, thus you are more shady than half the people you accuse here on this forum.   Lauda was imediatelly demoted for this, her account was flagged, none of you wanna be ass lickers called him/her out on it, cause during that time you were too busy kissing ass cheecks left and right to make your way through the Bitcointalk rankings.
Lauda and co took it upon themselves to be judge jury and executioner, and when Zeroxal proved the source of his bitcoin holdings ( though it's wild he had to do an AML for Lauda ), bitcointalk's "Justice League' backed down.  Sadly Zeroxal should've went to the police/authorities with the extortion attempts against him, but since the guy had quite big amount of bags, I'm assuming more or less he didn't want to get authorities involved to protect his privacy same way you don't want to meet up.

Even if the story behind the PGP key was legitimate, it is still wrong in 100 different ways and ILLEGAL the way they went about it.  But the PGP key could also have been an "alibi" in case the obvious happened and Zeroxal went public with the extortion attempt, which it did!

But like I said, you're just on overachieving ass licker with morals that work only when you decide them to.

You deflect any  feedback that's thrown to you and doesn't paint you in a good light.  You are literally more shady than half the people you accuse here on bitcointalk.




You start to act same way saxydev used to, for a while. Perhaps imbecility is contagious. Meaning to say words which I never said.


This is  the funniest shit you've said so far, considering this is the exact way you're going about all of this, but hey you know that old romanian saying " Thieves scream thieves", that sums you up just right.



Probably those which don't care about privacy and which run to offer all their personal information to centralized exchanges.


Like I said, you're simply turning things how they sim fit with your little stories to bring you in a good light. Kind of wild that some years ago you were suggesting an IRL meet up for bitcointalk members !? But hey, of course you'd backtrack 100% now since it would prove that you're just a dumb fuck who simply deflects anything thrown their way, but I really do suggest you should keep some track on your bullshits, otherwise you'll keep saying opposite things all the time.

Something crossed my mind recently, especially after reading Welsh's topic regarding collectible coins; I'll explain below.

Would anyone be interested into celebrating the 15th anniversary of the forum by a real world meeting, held in Arnhem?

I don't know how many forum users know each other in real life, but I think only a few. Besides, I also think that many would like to know each other, or to get to know the elders here. This could be a nice chance!

Why I suggested Arnhem? Because this city proclaimed that it is the world’s most Bitcoin-friendly city and it wants "to demonstrate there is an alternative for the current financial system by creating a bitcoin economy".
Other reasons for thinking about Arnhem: the city is beautiful and there are many merchants accepting Bitcoin. Furthermore, this city already held an important Bitcoin event in the past: The Future of Bitcoin conference, in 2017.

Now what's the connection with Welsh's topic: he mentioned at some point that he started to think about the respective coins in February 2019, but, apparently, it was already late, in order to have them on November 22nd. So I imagined that if 9 months weren't enough for obtaining the coins, most likely, for organizing such event it would take much more time. Even years.

That's why I wrote this suggestion now, almost 5 years prior the date of November 22nd, 2024.

What do you think about this? would anyone be interested in a meetup of this kind?
copper member
Activity: 783
Merit: 710
Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com
You throw around pretty loaded words. Went from drama queen to keyboard warrior in 2.5 seconds. Interesting to see there is so much venom in that little head of yours.

Let's get some things straight:

- I don't know and really don't care who coincollector12 is. Don't care much about your opinion on the matter but thought to reiterate this anyway
- Supporting the flag c0ldbrewz made does not seem relevant to anyone apparently. Even though it's the main reason of this thread.
- If opposing the flag dkbit made against saxydev, related solely to that bet, makes me a scam supporter than that should say more about you than it does about me. When there are different cases, even when talking about the same person, one might not default to "guilty" everytime.
You for example: there were cases where I did agree with what you said and you seemed like a lucid and cerebral person. But also others where you do a 180 and turn into an ass licking two faced drama queen pajeet.


legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
please stop thinking of yourself as the second coming of Satoshi Nakamoto

I believed you were supposed to answer to some questions unaddressed since January 27th...

Don't worry I'll make sure to address every word and punctuation you've pointed my way.

Oh, wait, I forgot you are here just to spread buzzwords.

you're not that important mate to be worried about someone trying to dox you

Actually, I am worried, And, like any sane person, I am trying to avoid it. 1miau already tried to explain the obvious to you but, of course, it was n vain, as all you seek is to throw zero-value words instead of actually having a rational dialogue.

No idea what a Cryptios gang is

Perhaps you are having a double personality disorder. Don't worry, "the other "you" knows who Cryptios is.
 
So basically because of the good Lauda did to this forum you support extortion and blackmail ? Kind of messed up set of values you have there mister.

You start to act same way saxydev used to, for a while. Perhaps imbecility is contagious. Meaning to say words which I never said.



Indeed. If Merit abusers are smart now, they could bring up that case.
And honestly, how could we debunk their excuses? Their requests would really have some sort of legitimacy...

I believe theymos feels proud for knowing he is paying such scumbags.

He could log in on his main account and confirm it, if his main account would write a comment confirming it.
Should be an easy task for him if he really wants to prove us wrong.

That would still not suffice... He could talk to a friendly scammer friend for making such post.

Why bother archiving something that cannot be undone ?
Why not, it's easier than posting a picture. And did you know that Bitcointalk is a centralized database? Maybe one day it might be possible to be undone. You are acting that it would be as secure as a Bitcoin transaction, which is bullshit.

Probably, after nonchalantly supporting scammers lately, Rizzrack feels also tempted about the dark side of Force and maybe he wants to try pulling a full scam. Yet he worries about his exit scam, because you archive everything. (Thinking is perspective is a virtues!) 1miau, would you just stop archiving his posts, please??? Grin Let the poor man do a honorable scam... come one!

I don't need to mention how ridiculous your suggestion really is.  Cheesy
Your suggestion is similar bullshit like once MinoRaiola's request to meet me in person, which is shady as hell and endangering our privacy. We should not engage in it!

The scammer supporter tries to look like the accounts are looking for reciprocal doxxing, to not be suspected ny anything while, in fact, he is looking to doxx me, lol.

What's wrong with you to pressure GazetaBitcoin to get potentially doxxed?
Are you proud to potentially damage someone's privacy?
That is as shady as it gets!

Yet he is confused about my negative feedback.



This might come as a shock to you, but people from this forum, met in real life quite a few times.

Probably those which don't care about privacy and which run to offer all their personal information to centralized exchanges.

But I kind of get it, since your pal GazetaBitcoin is all onboard with extortion and harrasmenet, kind of makes sense why he wouldn't want people knowing who he is.

Where did you take all ideas from? About harassment and extortion?

In case you are referring to Lauda, I just said that all she did good for this forum is what you'll never do from 10 alt accounts in 10 years from now on. All the scammers she exposed...!

Then, of course, without knowing anything, you simply throw buzzwords around. But, for the sake of showing what a piece of shit you are I will lose some time now and debunk also this statement of yours:

1. Probably you saw the topic Lauda/TMAN extortion attempt and, without reading anything from it, you start to stirr the shit, without realizing that all you do is simply covering yourself in shit.

2. Of course, you also did not read the archived topic mentioned in the OP of the thread linked by me above: https://archive.is/szqRf#selection-501.0-501.70. Meaning the one used as a basis for accusation.

3. If you actually search for that topic inside the forum, you'll see that liar Zeroxal deleted his accusation and moved the topic to Archive board, for making sure nobody ever finds it again: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/tbc-1759607. Yet I found it.

4. Of course, you also never cared for reading Lauda's signed message, explaining what that shit was all about. To be more precise, it was a sting operation and in no way an extortion attempt.

If that was an extortion or a blackmailing, then Lauda were banned. Yet this did not happen. Why, dipshit? Would you answer why? Let me tell you, because you are just a piece of shit throwing buzzwords around, for impressing those naively reading just your posts and not the entire context: Lauda was never banned for extortion / blackmailing because there was no extortion nor any blackmailing involved.

All that happened was that Lauda was demoted from moderator position, as the way she acted -- meaning this sting operation -- was certainly not a good nor a wise thing to do. Yet, if theymos would have considered her an extortioner or blackmailer, he would have banned her since then. So stop throwing buzzwords around!

5. Furthermore, TMAN was also never banned for extortion / blackmailing (highlight is mine):

there was no blackmail - have you read the PGP message? if you had you wouldn't be in here. this is an assault from QS a proven scammer against Lauda I happened to of been involved as I was the one who bought the suspicious activity to light.

no extortion was taking place - it was an intel gathering exercise that backfired.

that is of little consequence now as all the evidence is in Place - I am awaiting return contact from moderators to discuss

Why was that? Again, because there was no extortion / blackmailing.

6. Even furthermore:

proof above - if lauda was extorting for money then where is the payment address?

7. Lauda's profile shows a Marketplace Trust score of +35 / =17 / -6. That's more positive Trust than you'll have in your life. From those 6 negative feedbacks, 3 are related to her vanishing.

Besides, by reading all feedbacks she ever received, there is no feedback from any reputable DT user stating anything about any kind of extortion / blackmail. Again, how can you explain that?

I'd go even further but I know it's for nothing, as you don't read anything and simply show up here to eat some more shit.

Still funny as heck though, seems I got a negative trust rating from the newsletter guy also, thus proving my point, why posting from an alt account.  But go ahead though, tell me more how he's not abusing the trust system however fits his teenage girl dramas.

The negative feedback is justified by your doxxing-oriented actions. Such actions make me not trust you at all regarding any possible kind of deal and I wrote that in the feedback. This is what Marketplace Trust was implemented for. On the other side, you don't understand anything from this system, thus you wrote me a retaliatory feedback which only proves how imbecile you are. You acted just like saxydev or other morons, which react with retaliatory feedbacks (without understanding that (1) their feedbacks are not even show on someone's profile, as they are only shown at Untrusted feedback section; (2) their feedbacks have zero value). Now this is Trust abuse and misuse of Marketplace Trust system -- meaning to write retaliatory feedbacks.

But hey, since you guys have clearly no problem with extortion and blackmail

Any reference for this?



noticed some similarities whenever Gazeta goes after someone, weirdly enough you follow him, must be just a coincidence.
"Whenever"?  Cheesy Cheesy
Can you point out, where else did it happen?
Or did you log into the wrong account to write that comment?  Cheesy
Or are you just delusional?

I believe you are not actually expecting an answer from this dipshit, since all he does is to cover himself in deep shit, while throwing baseless words around.

Yes, go to bed in time, 8 minutes difference to Rizzrack, well done!
It's been late in Romania, hasn't it?  Cheesy

Last online
coincollector12     Today at 12:38:56 AM    archive
Rizzrack              Today at 12:30:31 AM    archive

Lol! Rizzrack is one of most pathetic scammer supporter, liar and trust abuser.



Meanwhile, saxydev already scammed 3 users in less than a month yet this clown named Rizzrack accuses me of stupid things I never said nor ever done.
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 6947
Currently not much available - see my websitelink
Well, do it.
Empty words are meaningless.
And if it's not your second alt (which we could expect from your Clown show), we'll honor that.

It must be very late in Romania right now. Maybe you want go to bed now and (what a coincidence), Rizzrack is still up as well. How late is it in Romania?  Wink

I'd honestly keep going but don't see it making any sense at this point. I mean you're clearly sticking up with your "pal", fun fact,
Honestly, I didn't ready anything from you and your scammers friends for a whole week or even longer since my questions haven't been addressed in the other topic.
I've noticed the new scam accusation against saxydev just recently, where he scammed c0ldbrewz and I didn't had much time to re-read everything, so it took me a while to reply here but make no mistake: I'll watch you and call out your bullshittery, when it happens right away.

noticed some similarities whenever Gazeta goes after someone, weirdly enough you follow him, must be just a coincidence.
"Whenever"?  Cheesy Cheesy
Can you point out, where else did it happen?
Or did you log into the wrong account to write that comment?  Cheesy
Or are you just delusional?


But hey, since you guys have clearly no problem with extortion and blackmail,  doing your little troll show isn't probaby even 10 % of what you're capable off.
Yes, it doesn't take much investigative effort to debunk your obvious bullshit.  Smiley


So bye, at least for now, probably gona have to respond to NewsletterTabloid's next period tantrum.
Yes, go to bed in time, 8 minutes difference to Rizzrack, well done!
It's been late in Romania, hasn't it?  Cheesy

Last online
coincollector12     Today at 12:38:56 AM    archive
Rizzrack              Today at 12:30:31 AM    archive
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 1
This might come as a shock to you, but people from this forum, met in real life quite a few times.  
You know that some people don't want to meet with any strange Alt Account owner from Bitcointalk, who's defending scammers in addition?
Privacy is a very valuable good and we should not endager it, which you are doing!



I could post from my main account, but then again you'd proceed in saying after  "that doesn't mean that your main account isn't an alt of Rizzrack also".
Well, do it.
Empty words are meaningless.
And if it's not your second alt (which we could expect from your Clown show), we'll honor that.

It must be very late in Romania right now. Maybe you want go to bed now and (what a coincidence), Rizzrack is still up as well. How late is it in Romania?  Wink

I'd honestly keep going but don't see it making any sense at this point. I mean you're clearly sticking up with your "pal", fun fact, noticed some similarities whenever Gazeta goes after someone, weirdly enough you follow him, must be just a coincidence.

But hey, since you guys have clearly no problem with extortion and blackmail,  doing your little troll show isn't probaby even 10 % of what you're capable off. So I'll be off for now, probably gona get those beers that Rizrack suggested, or wait I suggested to myself, no idea at this point, you guys might have convinced me of being his alt.  I applaud your detective skills.

So bye, at least for now, probably gona have to respond to NewsletterTabloid's next period tantrum.
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 6947
Currently not much available - see my websitelink
This might come as a shock to you, but people from this forum, met in real life quite a few times.  
You know that some people don't want to meet with any strange Alt Account owner from Bitcointalk, who's defending scammers in addition?
Privacy is a very valuable good and we should not endanger it, which you are doing!



I could post from my main account, but then again you'd proceed in saying after  "that doesn't mean that your main account isn't an alt of Rizzrack also".
Well, do it.
Empty words are meaningless.
And if it's not your second alt (which we could expect from your Clown show), we'll honor that.

It must be very late in Romania right now. Maybe you want go to bed now and (what a coincidence), Rizzrack is still up as well. How late is it in Romania?  Wink
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 1

Wow, so you are saying you know it's not your alt and now you are now setting him under pressure to doxx him? Becuase if he rejects to protect his privacy (which would be legitimate) you are making him look bad.
I don't need to mention how ridiculous your suggestion really is.  Cheesy
Your suggestion is similar bullshit like once MinoRaiola's request to meet me in person, which is shady as hell and endangering our privacy. We should not engage in it!



This might come as a shock to you, but people from this forum, met in real life quite a few times.   And funny enough, hell didn't break loose.

But I kind of get it, since your pal GazetaBitcoin is all onboard with extortion and harrasmenet, kind of makes sense why he wouldn't want people knowing who he is.

I could post from my main account, but then again you'd proceed in saying after  "that doesn't mean that your main account isn't an alt of Rizzrack also".



Still funny as heck though, seems I got a negative trust rating from the newsletter guy also, thus proving my point, why posting from an alt account.  But go ahead though, tell me more how he's not abusing the trust system however fits his teenage girl dramas.
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 6947
Currently not much available - see my websitelink
LOL, what a shitshow. [...]

Is Rizzrack willing to give you some Merit or would he commit Merit abuse?  Tongue
Indeed, I'm waiting for an answer as well but since Rizzrack obviously had a clown for breakfast

I think that Rizzrack just answered you, 1miau:



Defying any decency, he actually merited his alt! Lol.
LOL

He just merited his alt after your reply, to show us all his muscles and the fact that he is brave enough for performing also merit abuse.
That's certainly a good example for all users having alts.
When I've replied, it has been there already as I've also archived it but indeed it would be Merit abuse.  Lips sealed

After all, seeing a forum official meriting his alt is certainly an example to follow, right?
Indeed. If Merit abusers are smart now, they could bring up that case.
And honestly, how could we debunk their excuses? Their requests would really have some sort of legitimacy...


Since it's currently impossible to prove if coincollector12 is an alt of Rizzrack, only he knows if it's his alt or not.

At same time it's also impossible to prove it's not his alt.
True...


After all, there's still a possibility: coincollector12 could prove us wrong if he would reveal his main account. Are you going to prove us wrong by posting from your main account?  Cool

Even by pointing the finger to an account and saying "that's my main account", that would still not prove anything 100%. For example, you could say that Lauda is your alt account: nobody could prove you wrong as you also could never prove you're right =)))
He could log in on his main account and confirm it, if his main account would write a comment confirming it.
Should be an easy task for him if he really wants to prove us wrong.



This scam is brought to you by .....

I think you left this sentence not ended Smiley
Yes, I left it open and all readers can finish the sentence accordingly from the content here...  Wink



he has finally sent a Merit to coincollector12 (archived)  Lips sealed

Why bother archiving something that cannot be undone ?
Why not, it's easier than posting a picture. And did you know that Bitcointalk is a centralized database? Maybe one day it might be possible to be undone. You are acting that it would be as secure as a Bitcoin transaction, which is bullshit.



Since it's currently impossible to prove if coincollector12 is an alt of Rizzrack, only he knows if it's his alt or not.
For sure: undoubtedly, there are sooo many similarities...  Lips sealed
After all, there's still a possibility: coincollector12 could prove us wrong if he would reveal his main account. Are you going to prove us wrong by posting from your main account?  Cool

I know I'm not !

To be fair there certainly are some similarities between us but not for the reasons you suspect !
@coincollector12 let's meet and get some beers. Always a pleasure to discuss with people that have the same mindset Grin shoot me a PM if you want. I'm buying ! (this offer is limited to 2 dozen beers. Just so I don't get a flag of my own for not fulfilling my pinky promises)
Wow, so you are saying you know it's not your alt and now you are setting him under pressure to doxx him? Becuase if he rejects to protect his privacy (which would be legitimate) you are making him look bad.
I don't need to mention how ridiculous your suggestion really is.  Cheesy
Your suggestion is similar bullshit like once MinoRaiola's request to meet me in person, which is shady as hell and endangering our privacy. We should not engage in it!



Again, why don't we put our money where our mouth is, and why don't you accept my offer of 0.1 btc ( escrowed) proving I'm not Rizzrack's alt ?  Since we're all from the same country it shouldn't be too hard to do it.   I'm guessing I could simply come and show you my device, the one I've been using to connect on bitcointalk for the past 5 years + on my main account and ofcourse this one for the past 1 year +,   and if Rizzrack would do the same I'm pretty sure a moderator/admin would be kind enough to confirm that these devices were used to log on since the beginning.  I'm willing to dox myself to you to simply show the lack in your brain's capacity, or better yet lets sweeten the pot,  0.2 BTC, if Rizzrack does the same that's some easy 0.4 BTC for you  right ?   You're trying to hard to set an image of yourself as some high and mighty forum superstar, when in fact it just proves my point, not agreeing with your way of handling things = painting an user in a way that fits your ego.
LOL, you are even crazier.  Huh
What's wrong with you to pressure GazetaBitcoin to get potentially doxxed?
Are you proud to potentially damage someone's privacy?
That is as shady as it gets!
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 1
Mighty Rizzrack is back together with his alt, making himself ridiculous once more, posting from his alt account once then replaying from his main account (to himself, lol) 6 minutes later....


P.S. - Lauda did more good for this forum that you'll ever do, together with your main account and together with all your Cryptios gang.

You could send your mother for all I care, hire a 3rd party mediator to meet us and confirm the data or whatever, but we both know you won't accept, as it will simply prove you're wrong and your fragile ego couldn't handle that.  And please stop thinking of yourself as the second coming of Satoshi Nakamoto, you're not that important mate to be worried about someone trying to dox you, not that I'd need to meet you face to face to figure out who you are....


No idea what a Cryptios gang is, but hey, I'm kind of getting used to you spouting ridiculous nonsense.
 

So basically because of the good Lauda did to this forum you support extortion and blackmail ? Kind of messed up set of values you have there mister.



To be fair there certainly are some similarities between us but not for the reasons you suspect !
@coincollector12 let's meet and get some beers. Always a pleasure to discuss with people that have the same mindset Grin shoot me a PM if you want. I'm buying ! (this offer is limited to 2 dozen beers. Just so I don't get a flag of my own for not fulfilling my pinky promises)

For fuck sake dude !!! I'm starting to believe them !

https://i.imgur.com/1mJzrxL.png

I might actually take you up on that offer, but considering the circumstances and the truth our friend who like to write newsletters has uncovered, might I add even better than Sherlock Holmes would uncover the most sofisticated murder mistery, wouldn't that mean you'd simply be buying beers to yourself ?!
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Mighty Rizzrack is back together with his alt, making himself ridiculous once more, posting from his alt account once then replying from his main account (to himself, lol) 6 minutes later.



The he also tries to look smart, by admitting the similarities between him and his alt:

To be fair there certainly are some similarities between us but not for the reasons you suspect ! [...]
For fuck sake dude !!! I'm starting to believe them !

Of course there are so many similarities since it's the same individual behind both accounts. Actually, the way pixie85 described saxydev's "financial department" can be used for Rizzrack manipulating his accounts:

These fake business people crack me up every time.

Wait a second I will let my customer service agent contact you

Hello this is Saxydev's customer service, how can I help you?
Ok, we will send the request to our financial department, please hold.

Hi, this is financial department, we're going to send a request to the wallet operator...



Here's a picture of the CEO, CTO, CFO, and the whole customer service department.

And, obviously, he forgot all he said the day before:

Don't worry I'll make sure to address every word and punctuation you've pointed my way.

It's good though that I never actually expected him to ever reply, as his alt is here only for throwing buzzwords:

Looking forward to it, although I doubt it'll ever happen.



Again, why don't we put our money where our mouth is, and why don't you accept my offer of 0.1 btc ( escrowed) proving I'm not Rizzrack's alt ?  Since we're all from the same country it shouldn't be too hard to do it.   I'm guessing I could simply come and show you my device, the one I've been using to connect on bitcointalk for the past 5 years + on my main account and ofcourse this one for the past 1 year +,   and if Rizzrack would do the same I'm pretty sure a moderator/admin would be kind enough to confirm that these devices were used to log on since the beginning.  I'm willing to dox myself to you to simply show the lack in your brain's capacity, or better yet lets sweeten the pot,  0.2 BTC, if Rizzrack does the same that's some easy 0.4 BTC for you  right ?

So you are practically saying that by luring me with 0.2 BTC (plus eventually 0.2 more -- and I see you are already talking instead of Rizzrack -- oh, wait, I forgot you are one and the same individual) combined with doxxing yourself, you actually intend to doxx Rizzrack too and also expose my privacy? Lol, you chose the wrong person. And also chose the wrong place for such offers.

P.S. - Noticed you mention missing Lauda, should I assume you support someone who openly tried to extort someone here on the forum? And went as far as to contacting the other user's family members? When Lauda and co could have simply handed it over to the authorities, if the proof they were talking about existed?

P.S. - Lauda did more good for this forum that you'll ever do, together with your main account and together with all your Cryptios gang.
copper member
Activity: 783
Merit: 710
Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com
Indeed, I'm waiting for an answer as well but since Rizzrack obviously had a clown for breakfast:
...burp !

he has finally sent a Merit to coincollector12 (archived)  Lips sealed

Why bother archiving something that cannot be undone ?



Since it's currently impossible to prove if coincollector12 is an alt of Rizzrack, only he knows if it's his alt or not.
For sure: undoubtedly, there are sooo many similarities...  Lips sealed
After all, there's still a possibility: coincollector12 could prove us wrong if he would reveal his main account. Are you going to prove us wrong by posting from your main account?  Cool

I know I'm not !

To be fair there certainly are some similarities between us but not for the reasons you suspect !
@coincollector12 let's meet and get some beers. Always a pleasure to discuss with people that have the same mindset Grin shoot me a PM if you want. I'm buying ! (this offer is limited to 2 dozen beers. Just so I don't get a flag of my own for not fulfilling my pinky promises)

For fuck sake dude !!! I'm starting to believe them !

newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 1


Defying any decency, he actually merited his alt! Lol. He just merited his alt after your reply, to show us all his muscles and the fact that he is brave enough for performing also merit abuse.
That's certainly a good example for all users having alts. After all, seeing a forum official meriting his alt is certainly an example to follow, right?



Again, why don't we put our money where our mouth is, and why don't you accept my offer of 0.1 btc ( escrowed) proving I'm not Rizzrack's alt ?  Since we're all from the same country it shouldn't be too hard to do it.   I'm guessing I could simply come and show you my device, the one I've been using to connect on bitcointalk for the past 5 years + on my main account and ofcourse this one for the past 1 year +,   and if Rizzrack would do the same I'm pretty sure a moderator/admin would be kind enough to confirm that these devices were used to log on since the beginning.  I'm willing to dox myself to you to simply show the lack in your brain's capacity, or better yet lets sweeten the pot,  0.2 BTC, if Rizzrack does the same that's some easy 0.4 BTC for you  right ?   You're trying to hard to set an image of yourself as some high and mighty forum superstar, when in fact it just proves my point, not agreeing with your way of handling things = painting an user in a way that fits your ego.


I know you'll refuse to do it, since it doesn't fit your make belief scenarios and your forum "savior" complex.

If you continue basing your *facts* on how you see things fit in your head, simply shows the amount of objectivity you pull into this forum.

P.S. - Noticed you mention missing Lauda, should I assume you support someone who openly tried to extort someone here on the forum? And went as far as to contacting the other user's family members? When Lauda and co could have simply handed it over to the authorities, if the proof they were talking about existed?


Does anyone have an undeniable way of proving account ownership and dismissing the " alt of someone" theory ? Open to suggestions, prefferably someone other than GazetaBitcoin's groupie 1miau.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
LOL, what a shitshow. [...]

Is Rizzrack willing to give you some Merit or would he commit Merit abuse?  Tongue
Indeed, I'm waiting for an answer as well but since Rizzrack obviously had a clown for breakfast

I think that Rizzrack just answered you, 1miau:



Defying any decency, he actually merited his alt! Lol. He just merited his alt after your reply, to show us all his muscles and the fact that he is brave enough for performing also merit abuse.
That's certainly a good example for all users having alts. After all, seeing a forum official meriting his alt is certainly an example to follow, right?

Since it's currently impossible to prove if coincollector12 is an alt of Rizzrack, only he knows if it's his alt or not.

At same time it's also impossible to prove it's not his alt.

After all, there's still a possibility: coincollector12 could prove us wrong if he would reveal his main account. Are you going to prove us wrong by posting from your main account?  Cool

Even by pointing the finger to an account and saying "that's my main account", that would still not prove anything 100%. For example, you could say that Lauda is your alt account: nobody could prove you wrong as you also could never prove you're right =)))

For sure: undoubtedly, there are sooo many similarities...  Lips sealed

Yes, and this is the foundation for believing that coincollector12 is, in fact, Rizzrack;s alt. Rizzrack played a dangerous game here and he lost in the end. What he tried to do was a reverse psychology: act with his alt in such an obvious way -- like a true alt -- and believing that others would think that it's certainly not possible for coincollector12 to be his alt as he is acting too obvious like an alt for actually being an alt. Does this make sense until now?

So he hoped people would not believe that coincollector12 is his alt because there were way too many coincidences which could make coincollector12 his alt. And having people believe coincollector12 is not his alt because he is acting too obvious like an alt made him (Rizzrack) actually to use his alt named coincollector12, lol. So he tried to be too smart but ended up as a supporter of scammers.

At same time, he pushed his alt forward, for exposing the alt in case negative tags were to shower him -- and have his alt as cannon fodder:

Thus the reason I'm posting from an alt account since I'm 100% sure that I'll be painted red, or the least neutral for even blinking at you,  and while Rizzrack has been posting from his own account, I'm assuming he's not worried about going into a fist fight with you over the way this thread proceeded since he has a high ranking account

But while trying to show he has balls enough by posting from his main account too he did not actually take into consideration that the situation would end up exactly in the opposite way: so now his alt is clean, while is he proved as supporter of scammers.



That's true, it's a big shame for Bitcointalk. But it's nothing new that moderators have covered up shitposters, straight out lied and now even cover up scammers...

Sadly, all we can do (for now) is distrusting such individuals which, if they were not part of staff, they were painted in red for a long time now.

Yes, scams are not moderated, according to the rules. Did I get anything wrong from that part? Does it mean that scams are enabled?  Cheesy Cheesy

Yes, Rizzrack enabled them. For the second time.

It's a really, really big shame for Bitcointalk. Isn't it our job to expose scammers, not to encourage them?

Based on Rizzrack's activity as a profficient supporter of scammers I'd tend to say that some of them are certainly getting paid for nothing.

This scam is brought to you by .....

I think you left this sentence not ended Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 6947
Currently not much available - see my websitelink
By the way, 1miau is also waiting for an answer from you:

LOL, what a shitshow. [...]

Is Rizzrack willing to give you some Merit or would he commit Merit abuse?  Tongue
Indeed, I'm waiting for an answer as well but since Rizzrack obviously had a clown for breakfast:

Is Rizzrack willing to give you some Merit or would he commit Merit abuse?  Tongue




he has finally sent a Merit to coincollector12 (archived)  Lips sealed

Since it's currently impossible to prove if coincollector12 is an alt of Rizzrack, only he knows if it's his alt or not.
For sure: undoubtedly, there are sooo many similarities...  Lips sealed
After all, there's still a possibility: coincollector12 could prove us wrong if he would reveal his main account. Are you going to prove us wrong by posting from your main account?  Cool



And I'd appreciate it if you stop addressing me as Rizzrack's alt, without any valid proof other than your tingly spidey teenage girl sense.
Should I stop as well because I just can't ignore the coincidences. Should we list all of the previously listed coincidences again?

So after being offline since Februyary 13th, Rizzrack's alt suddenly wakes up; again, just after he posted from his main account and pretending it's just a coincidence. How sweet!
Ok, I was only going to bring up previously listed ones, not new ones...  Cheesy



However, I am sorry for your loss. But it's hard to do anything when the scammer is supported by forum staff. Officially supported by a forum official.
That's true, it's a big shame for Bitcointalk. But it's nothing new that moderators have covered up shitposters, straight out lied and now even cover up scammers...
Yes, scams are not moderated, according to the rules. Did I get anything wrong from that part? Does it mean that scams are enabled?  Cheesy Cheesy
It's a really, really big shame for Bitcointalk. Isn't it our job to expose scammers, not to encourage them?
This scam is brought to you by .....
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
I answerred you yesterday

You must live in an alternate reality. After replying to all your rigmaroles, I asked you some questions (starting with Jan 27th); today is Feb 23rd yet you never replied. You just popped-in, threw some words, ignored all questions and vanished like saxydev.

Don't worry I'll make sure to address every word and punctuation you've pointed my way.

Looking forward to it, although I doubt it'll ever happen.

were you by any chance not accepted into the "popular girl group" back in highschool and trying now to relive your dream life via bitcointalk ?

Obviously, how else?

Edit - My offer still stands, 0.1 btc if I'm Rizzrack's alt or not.

I already explained you, and 1miau too, that there is no way in the world for you to prove that you are not his alt, as it's no way to prove you are his alt. So stop this BS. But you don't read any post, in fact, do you? You just appear here to throw various words after your master account notices that your reply is requested.

By the way, 1miau is also waiting for an answer from you:

LOL, what a shitshow. [...]

Is Rizzrack willing to give you some Merit or would he commit Merit abuse?  Tongue

And I'd appreciate it if you stop addressing me as Rizzrack's alt, without any valid proof other than your tingly spidey teenage girl sense.

I would also appreciate now if FCSB would be winner of Romanian Superliga. Sadly, things aren't always the way we wish. Gotta live with them as they are.

Ah jeez.... no idea why I decided to post from an alt account in the first place.

Neither do I. You could have used just just your main account, no need to write from both.



wow. really wow. sent pm to someone i trust from the forum with the details

You PMed someone you trust? Loooooooool! Who gives a shit on who you trust?!
Just for the sake of the discussion: is this guy bekli23 or andulolika?

he can confirm or not

This is like saying "tomorrow it may or may not rain" -- and be right in any of the two situations. Your friend Rizzrack advised you to choose your words so carefully?

locally i don't store the key any more, but i had the intuition to restore the drive to get it back a few weeks ago and got it saved.

Yet, still, you can't present any proof.

@newsletterbitcoin , you are delusional and gay. 100% gay. gay and tired. gay and shitposter

edit: you are also fat. very fat. fat and gay.

100% 👍
You showed me!



saxydev is apparently counting time different from normal people, so from his ''brb sleep 48-72 hrs'' that was posted on February 13th passed more than 240 hours.
This is one more lie on the list of his lies, and it's not surprising that he came up with this new excuse of not storing keys locally and sending them to some unknown ''trusted'' forum member...
I can't wait to see what he is going to post next, and yes I almost forgot to say... I still didn't receive 0.1 BTC from him, but there is still hope.

Probably, being supported in scam by a forum official gave him enough guts to continue this charade. As PrivacyG said a while ago,

Just found this thread.  What a fun read.

However, I am sorry for your loss. But it's hard to do anything when the scammer is supported by forum staff. Officially supported by a forum official.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
Going to sleep, brb 48-72 hrs
saxydev is apparently counting time different from normal people, so from his ''brb sleep 48-72 hrs'' that was posted on February 13th passed more than 240 hours.
This is one more lie on the list of his lies, and it's not surprising that he came up with this new excuse of not storing keys locally and sending them to some unknown ''trusted'' forum member...
I can't wait to see what he is going to post next, and yes I almost forgot to say... I still didn't receive 0.1 BTC from him, but there is still hope...
copper member
Activity: 783
Merit: 710
Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com
wow. really wow. sent pm to someone i trust from the forum with the details, he can confirm or not, depends if he wants to get involved in this thread. up to him. locally i don't store the key any more, but i had the intuition to restore the drive to get it back a few weeks ago and got it saved.

At this point it's irrelevant who YOU trust. Should have sent that to someone others trust like LoyceV. He actually offered...
member
Activity: 429
Merit: 52
wow. really wow. sent pm to someone i trust from the forum with the details, he can confirm or not, depends if he wants to get involved in this thread. up to him. locally i don't store the key any more, but i had the intuition to restore the drive to get it back a few weeks ago and got it saved.

@newsletterbitcoin , you are delusional and gay. 100% gay. gay and tired. gay and shitposter

edit: you are also fat. very fat. fat and gay.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 1
So after being offline since Februyary 13th, Rizzrack's alt suddenly wakes up; again, just after he posted from his main account and pretending it's just a coincidence. How sweet!

Look.... you keep contradicting yourself, while you mention in some comments that I'm not Rizzrack's alt

I never mentioned you are not his alt. I mentioned that (1) it's possible for you to be his alt and (2) that it doesn't matter if you are, or not, his alt.

In any case, as I also wrote once more,

In any case, no matter if coincollector12is his alt or not

Do you understand this? It does not matter if you are his alt or not.

I don't know how you read texts, but I think I was very clear.

I promise I'll take the time in the following days to address your questions

Ohhh I must feel blessed! Thanks for this sign of generosity! However, be careful that you read with attention those questions, meaning word by word, in order to make sure you understand what I asked and avoid embarrassing yourself like you did until now, when you either said something which I did not say or you made another Houdini move, just like saxydev did.


It's not that "after been offline since 13th of february" it's more along the lines that you literally addressed me 2 days ago, and I answerred you yesterday.

Don't worry I'll make sure to address every word and punctuation you've pointed my way.

But man, honestly now, it really seems like you have an act for stirring up drama,  were you by any chance not accepted into the "popular girl group" back in highschool and trying now to relive your dream life via bitcointalk ?

Edit - My offer still stands, 0.1 btc if I'm Rizzrack's alt or not.  
And I'd appreciate it if you stop addressing me as Rizzrack's alt, without any valid proof other than your tingly spidey teenage girl sense.  Cause if I'd follow your judgement, considering the lack of brain cell power you show,  which of course you've accused saxydev of lacking in that department, I will consider based on your Sherlock Holmes how to make a case guide,  I might assume you're an alt of saxydev.


Edit 2.0 - It appears he's even given me a trust rating based on what his beed sheets looked like this morning.       Ah jeez.... no idea why I decided to post from an alt account in the first place.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
So after being offline since Februyary 13th, Rizzrack's alt suddenly wakes up; again, just after he posted from his main account and pretending it's just a coincidence. How sweet!

Look.... you keep contradicting yourself, while you mention in some comments that I'm not Rizzrack's alt

I never mentioned you are not his alt. I mentioned that (1) it's possible for you to be his alt and (2) that it doesn't matter if you are, or not, his alt.

In any case, as I also wrote once more,

In any case, no matter if coincollector12is his alt or not

Do you understand this? It does not matter if you are his alt or not.

I don't know how you read texts, but I think I was very clear.

I promise I'll take the time in the following days to address your questions

Ohhh I must feel blessed! Thanks for this sign of generosity! However, be careful that you read with attention those questions, meaning word by word, in order to make sure you understand what I asked and avoid embarrassing yourself like you did until now, when you either said something which I did not say or you made another Houdini move, just like saxydev did.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 1


Rizzrack's alt also did not have the guts for answering my questions. All good.




Look.... you keep contradicting yourself, while you mention in some comments that I'm not Rizzrack's alt, you also proceed in putting up retarded comments such as this one where your detective skills clearly figured it all out.

I promise I'll take the time in the following days to address your questions,  though I'm pretty sure you'll find a way to take things out of context so they fit your Sherlock Holmes narative.
copper member
Activity: 783
Merit: 710
Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com
...dumb shitpost...



No use arguing with someone who gets paid to reply so... welcome to the ignore list. Get comfortable ! It's gonna be a while  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
considering that about 60 hours passed since our Prince charming went to have his his "brb" beauty sleep,

Going to sleep, brb 48-72 hrs

it means that in 12h at max from now on the beauty will wake up and clear things up again, as he always does.

Holy Mother of God!



I was wrong! How can it be?

It's been already 204 hours and our prince charming is still sleeping! Is sleeping beauty feeling well?

It's hard to understand how such an active businessman can sleep so much... Who runs the businesses in his place? It is possible though to actually assist to the Houdini move?

c0ldbrewz, I guess his "financial department" still did not reach you yet? If so, maybe they have a problem with their Internet connection or with phone lines... Perhaps saxydev is working his ass out right now, harvesting some strawberries at an Italian or Spanish farm, for obtaining your 90$? (It may take a while though; although the amount seems small it is, in fact huge!)

Meanwhile, Rizzrack's alt still did not support your flag so Rizzrack must have mixed feelings for supporting it. In part, he is still supporting the scammer, as he opposed the flag created for scamming dkbit98. Watching forum staff officially supporting scammers can only bring confidence to all users.

Rizzrack's alt also did not have the guts for answering my questions. All good.

legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Based on the chat logs, it was saxydev who decided to make the XMR payment, as expected.

Yes, no wonder about that. I don't understand why he did not propose to send the money in an envelope, using regular mail, then blame the mail system for losing the precious envelope, containing the 90$, which was personally taken to the mail box by the Head of his "financial department".

Even if he did send the payment (that's a big IF) and then deleted the wallet or lost access to it for whatever reason

I guess we all know that chances for this to have happened are merely none.

[...] and he later restores the wallet from the mnemonic seed, he will no longer have access to the secret TX key of the transaction. This is because the key can only be obtained from the local wallet used to create the transaction. But I bet he didn't know that, as he repeated the same lie in the Discord chat

Well, considering that about 60 hours passed since our Prince charming went to have his his "brb" beauty sleep,

Going to sleep, brb 48-72 hrs

it means that in 12h at max from now on the beauty will wake up and clear things up again, as he always does.

Kind of ironic considering this is the same guy who was offering his blockchain forensics services to the community.  Cheesy

Lol!



thanks guys for your support, really appreciated it.

Welcome! It seems now that both flags have enough support. Furthermore, yours is also supported by the fan-of scammers, which is very interesting. He forgot to support the flag from his alt though.




yes, it was saxydev who decided want to pay me in XMR.
and as a freelancer who desperate to earn, i accepted it and created xmr address.

Now the harm is done... In the future make sure you properly analysis of entire situation, before accepting a deal.
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 5
thanks guys for your support, really appreciated it.

yes, it was saxydev who decided want to pay me in XMR.
and as a freelancer who desperate to earn, i accepted it and created xmr address.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
One question for you c0ldbrewz, since you said that you don't know much about monero, who exactly asked for payment for your work to be sent in XMR instead of BTC or some other coin?

I have to confess that this question also popped into my mind.

Based on the chat logs, it was saxydev who decided to make the XMR payment, as expected.

I actually made some digging on this matter. And the results are... how to say... fascinating. Apparently, saxydev made another "Houdini move" when he sent the payment to c0ldbrewz, as he managed to pay without having a XMR wallet At least this is what I can understand from this sentence, which I found in the other topic:

I am not going to pay you anything more. What I am going to is next 48 hours [...] to install a monero wallet and share the secret key with the txd.

Since the active businessman scammer said he will install a XMR wallet, this means he did not have one, right? Then taking into consideration that there are infinitesimal chances for him to delete a XMR wallet just after paying to c0ldbrewz (as he would not have any reason to do that), we conclude that he made the payment on Monero network without having a wallet, which is, again, pure magic. Fabulous! Am I missing something here?

Even if he did send the payment (that's a big IF) and then deleted the wallet or lost access to it for whatever reason, and he later restores the wallet from the mnemonic seed, he will no longer have access to the secret TX key of the transaction. This is because the key can only be obtained from the local wallet used to create the transaction. But I bet he didn't know that, as he repeated the same lie in the Discord chat:

what wallet are you using?
do rescan
you should have the function
i am installing a monero wallet and i will give the secret key to check it on blockchain

Kind of ironic considering this is the same guy who was offering his blockchain forensics services to the community.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
One question for you c0ldbrewz, since you said that you don't know much about monero, who exactly asked for payment for your work to be sent in XMR instead of BTC or some other coin?

I have to confess that this question also popped into my mind.

I actually made some digging on this matter. And the results are... how to say... fascinating. Apparently, saxydev made another "Houdini move" when he sent the payment to c0ldbrewz, as he managed to pay without having a XMR wallet At least this is what I can understand from this sentence, which I found in the other topic:

I am not going to pay you anything more. What I am going to is next 48 hours [...] to install a monero wallet and share the secret key with the txd.

Since the active businessman scammer said he will install a XMR wallet, this means he did not have one, right? Then taking into consideration that there are infinitesimal chances for him to delete a XMR wallet just after paying to c0ldbrewz (as he would not have any reason to do that), we conclude that he made the payment on Monero network without having a wallet, which is, again, pure magic. Fabulous! Am I missing something here?
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
after hearing suggestions from some of you guys.
i decided to open flag against saxydev.
fell free to support/oppose the flag.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3112
I supported the flag against saxydev, but I still hope you will receive coins you earned, and I can't wait to hear his reply after he comes back from that mysterious brb holiday vacation.
One question for you c0ldbrewz, since you said that you don't know much about monero, who exactly asked for payment for your work to be sent in XMR instead of BTC or some other coin?
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1537
Shush guys, please don't make any noise as saxydev is having his 48-72h beauty sleep and it would not be nice to disturb poor man from his nap. We all know how hard working he is and that he really needed to rest well.

Let's talk in silence.
I wish my laughter weren't loud so I wouldn't disturb him from his beautiful dreams  Grin maybe he's now dreaming about how to erase his red trusts to deceive more members LOL

@c0ldbrewz Sorry for your loss; you trusted him and worked for his false promises, again do not trust anyone you do not know, or there were no dealings he did with other members, or you can deal through the escrow service until you are sure that this bastard will pay you in the end, so as not to waste your time. There are many members with malicious intentions. One of them had previously contacted me to hire me for his job in return for a large amount of money, and things were going well at first, but soon he sent me links to programs containing Trojans so that I could try them to complete my works with him, but I refused to download and blocked him on discord because he a scammer wants to hack my computer, so we have to be careful.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1462
Yes, I'm an asshole
[...]
the TX private key is what saxydev would provide, he wrote and I quote, "to a trusted person outside the gang of [...] GazetaBitcoin" [...]

If I am, then I'll ask saxydev, do I fall under that criteria? You asked if anyone would do their role as part of the community, and here I am, volunteering purely to get this case closed.

I appreciate your good intentions, but I think that your effort is like asking the "sup fellas gang" to stop spamming. Do you remember the "sup fellas gang"?

Sup holydarkness?  Grin

[...]

Oh LOL, to be completely honest, I forgot about that part. That emoji made me laughed then as it is now.

To saxydev, the posts on that thread was a contribution to the forum, though, and doesn't necessarily mean I'm taking side, or favoring you or whoever involved on this case. I still stand with my offer, if you provide me with the real TxID and the TX private key, I'll report whatever results shown by the data to this forum. If you've really paid the OP and this is a simple misunderstanding, my offer is a good way to clear err... one of the flag raised against you.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Shush guys, please don't make any noise as saxydev is having his 48-72h beauty sleep and it would not be nice to disturb poor man from his nap. We all know how hard working he is and that he really needed to rest well.

Let's talk in silence.



the TX private key is what saxydev would provide, he wrote and I quote, "to a trusted person outside the gang of [...] GazetaBitcoin" [...]

If I am, then I'll ask saxydev, do I fall under that criteria? You asked if anyone would do their role as part of the community, and here I am, volunteering purely to get this case closed.

I appreciate your good intentions, but I think that your effort is like asking the "sup fellas gang" to stop spamming. Do you remember the "sup fellas gang"?

Sup holydarkness?  Grin



fell free to support/oppose the flag.

Flag supported from my side as well. Good job, OP!



How desperate do you have to be to steal $90 from someone?

I said in multiple occasions that this pauper is eating dirt from under his fingernails but, however, he seems to be working with "OK amounts" of money:

Information about cyprus banks -- here he was looking for advice on how to move 200.000 euro from a Moldavia bank to an Italian one. I wonder how could this pauper make 200.000 euro...

- banks - thanks thanks, it was an ok ammount from my perspective

You hear that, NotATether? 200.000E are an "Ok amount". From his tone this sounds like "not good, not bad" Smiley So I also do not understand what could possibly happen for him to not be able to pay the 2200$ owed to dkbit98 nor the 90$ owed to OP. His "financial department" also failed to make the payment. Very strange.

Yet after all these, Rizzrack-the-fan-of scammers and his alt accuse me for daring to expose this scammer!

What's the problem here? And you are pointing the finger at me, for starting this thread and having a scammer exposed? Are you out of your mind???



It seems that Elvis has left the building, and I doubt he'll be back.

Lol.

Guess someone found some services in under 15 minutes and had to edit posts before a reply from dkbit arrived.  Damn it, dkbit.  Had you been quicker, this thread would have been so much more fun to follow!  It would have ended as a 'how quickly can saxydev do the Houdini move'

Perhaps he just did "The Houdini move"?

However, he anticipated doing this multiple occasions:

If being against something in this forum is giving the right to someone to accuse, I will leave it.
Be my guest.
Ok. I'm out of this thread

Maybe he just decided to keep his words, as a honorable person which he is.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino

Flag supported from my side.

By the way, did anyone notice when he updated his profile page?
It seems that Elvis has left the building, and I doubt he'll be back.
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 5
after hearing suggestions from some of you guys.
i decided to open flag against saxydev.
fell free to support/oppose the flag.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3112
 Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino

Am I correct?

Yes, you are basically right. Except, that TX mentioned earlier is probably not related to this case since the information in screenshots, particularly the block number and timestamp, doesn't match up. "saxydev" claims that the transaction was confirmed in block 2813799 (mined about 10 days ago), and the mentioned TX is part of block 2820718 from a few days ago.


I see. But let's suppose we insist on using that TxID as it's what admitted by saxydev to be the valid TxID, and thus, the complete web address as I wrote above, will entering both entries --the address and the TX private key-- brings us a "false positive", i.e. it will says xxx amount of XMR --equals to 90$-- was indeed sent to OP's address while saxydev actually never send it? Or will it says something like, "invalid data, transaction not found"?

If what'll happen is the latter, then the result itself is conclusive enough that saxydev has never send the payment and brings us to the end of this case.

For the record, saxydev never confirmed that TxID. We inferred this from the screenshots provided by c0ldbrewz. (Which are most likely fabricated to mislead the recipient.)

You can never get a "false positive" result. Either he will give a valid TX ID and TX secret key that will validate the transaction, or you will get an error message such as "the transaction cannot be decrypted," depending on the tool used.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1462
Yes, I'm an asshole

Am I correct?

Yes, you are basically right. Except, that TX mentioned earlier is probably not related to this case since the information in screenshots, particularly the block number and timestamp, doesn't match up. "saxydev" claims that the transaction was confirmed in block 2813799 (mined about 10 days ago), and the mentioned TX is part of block 2820718 from a few days ago.


I see. But let's suppose we insist on using that TxID as it's what admitted by saxydev to be the valid TxID, and thus, the complete web address as I wrote above, will entering both entries --the address and the TX private key-- brings us a "false positive", i.e. it will says xxx amount of XMR --equals to 90$-- was indeed sent to OP's address while saxydev actually never send it? Or will it says something like, "invalid data, transaction not found"?

If what'll happen is the latter, then the result itself is conclusive enough that saxydev has never send the payment and brings us to the end of this case.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
...

How desperate do you have to be to steal $90 from someone?

A person wasn't happy with my work, asked for their $50 refund, I sent it back to them no problem. Case was closed.

People have been doing exit scams for much larger amounts recently, but $90 is a very pathetic value to ruin your reputation over. Why not just be frank and settle the transaction?
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino

Am I correct?

Yes, you are basically right. Except, that TX mentioned earlier is probably not related to this case since the information in screenshots, particularly the block number and timestamp, doesn't match up. "saxydev" claims that the transaction was confirmed in block 2813799 (mined about 10 days ago), and the mentioned TX is part of block 2820718 from a few days ago.

If I am, then I'll ask saxydev, do I fall under that criteria? You asked if anyone would do their role as part of the community, and here I am, volunteering purely to get this case closed. I don't think I'm on any gang on this forum, and I would like to call myself --well, self proclaimed as it is-- trustworthy enough. Would you PM me that TX private key which will allows all of us to see the truth behind this case?

Given that saxydev is already caught in a web of his own lies, I highly doubt he will send you any proof. Nonetheless, remain wary of his words, as he may try to weasel his way out once more.

And to any other members, as I am aware that screenshot can be edited, but suppose saxydev kept his words and provide me with the TX private key so that I can confirm that the payment is indeed sent --or didn't sent-- would the screenshot provided by me enough as an evidence? I can assure you all that I won't bother editing the screenshots --aside from cropping and obscuring anything that can be used to identify me-- as whatever shown wouldn't benefits or detrimental to me.

Sure, we can do that. If he gives you the transaction details and you confirm that it's legit, I'll adjust my trust rating based on your word (no need for a screenshot). However, as I have repeatedly pointed out, the transaction details don't reveal any information about the sender, but only the address of the recipient and the amount sent, so there is absolutely no reason not to share this information publicly in terms of privacy. So, there is no material difference between sharing a screenshot of a transaction receipt and a link to a transaction receipt, except that the latter provides verifiable evidence while the former does not.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Here's a picture of the CEO, CTO, CFO, and the whole customer service department.

Here's another picture of the CEO, CTO, CFO, the whole customer service department, financial department being also included Smiley

hero member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 531
On 24th January he reached me to re-confirmed if my address are correct or not, he will going on vacation and his financial department will send the money on 25th January.
Saxydev claimed he already sent the payment on 3rd February and the issue is on my wallet.
I asking for TxID and transaction key, He says he will install the wallet and send it to me after 5-10 hours of syncing.

What happened to the financial department. The boss has to install the wallet himself now?  
These fake business people crack me up every time.

Wait a second I will let my customer service agent contact you

Hello this is Saxydev's customer service, how can I help you?
Ok, we will send the request to our financial department, please hold.

Hi, this is financial department, we're going to send a request to the wallet operator...



Here's a picture of the CEO, CTO, CFO, and the whole customer service department.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Congrats for opening this thread, OP! You should have done this for a while now, but better later than never.

Now let's see... As dkbiy98 already emphasized,

If he didn't send the payment like promised until 25th January than he broke a deal again

Next step now is to open another flag against the scammer and use this topic as reference link. Perhaps you are afraid that he won't pay you anymore if you open the flag, but you were already in this situation since you made the deal with the scammer. Perhaps you still hoped for a while, but it was useless. If you are really afraid that he won't send you the money anymore if you open a flag then better think that he was not going to pay anything since you pointed the finger at him in the other thread. In any case, the truth is that he was not going to pay you since Jan 23rd, when you provided him the materials.

his financial department will send the money on 25th January.

Do you actually believe this? What financial department? And what financial department would not have 90$? Even the financial department of a Mom & Pop's store would have this kind of money. In any case, if you actually believed there is a real financial department, of a real company, how was this department going to pay you XMR, huh? Companies work with fiat, not with Monero. I really hope you never bit the scheme with the "financial department". Let's think even more far: suppose that department would work with XMR. How can a company take money out of its treasury without an invoice? I believe you haven't issued him any invoice, have you? Lol. I said that since the beginning: this scammer is eating the dirt from under his fingernails and is here for pilfering. If you sell your shoes you have enough money to buy him together with his entire family consisting in 15 brothers and sisters, all Gypsies, his parents, his four grandparents, all living in a 20 square meters one room dirty apartment from a hood full with paupers and unemployed. Like pajeets, as TMAN used to say. Do you know what a pajeet is? A smelly dirty curry drinking hairy Indian that poos in the Loo. Except that this scammer is Gypsy and poos in the Danube.

Saxydev claimed he already sent the payment on 3rd February

In the other topic you first said he promised you the payment on Jan 25th, right? Then he delayed to Feb 3rd. Now is Feb 13th. Do you think he'll take you out tomorrow, on Valentine's Day, buy you a meal and pay you the 90$? I believe not, so we get back to this:

For now the best option for me is just waiting [...]
it should be no more than 30-60mins
lets wait and see.

5-10 hours then, okay

He insist [...]
he will send me [...]
let's wait and see.

Do you see the pattern here?

And now he says

Going to sleep, brb 48-72 hrs

"Brb 48-72 hours"?!? What kind of "brb" is that? In what part of the world "be right back" means 48-72 hours? So it's not a "bbl" (be back later), but a "brb"! I wonder what "bbl" means for him, if "brb" means 72 hours. And who sleeps "28-72 hours"? This guy should be an example for all women from around the world, with a new definition of "I'll be ready in 5 minutes". When a woman says this it usually takes from 10 to 60 minutes, lol. But he is going to "be right back" in 72 hours. I short nap of 28-72 hours. All good.

Are all these enough reason for you, OP, to open a flag? Furthermore: even if he would pay you right now, the flag should still stand, for violating the contract you had! The payment does not make him clean, as a burglar is not exempted from jail if he pays back the victims what he stole from their house. The payment is only a form of accepting the guilt.



take it. you know the resources I pulled to get the key?

Ooooooooooooooo tell us! What resources did you have to pull? Did you have to carry mill stones? Did you have to run 50 km? Did you have to climb up to 100th floor of a building without elevator? Or what resources are we talking about here? I act like you made a herculean effort.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
Payment was promised will be send on 25th January.
If he didn't send the payment like promised until 25th January than he broke a deal again, and he is known for doing that before  Tongue

his financial department will send the money on 25th January.
Oh common please, this guy is lying that he owns some kind of company and people who work for him.
His ''financial department'' couldn't send $90 without their master and commander, so they had to wait for him to return from Davos WEF meeting Cheesy

Saxydev claimed he already sent the payment on 3rd February
Even if with some miracle you receive this money in the end, it's a fact that he broke a deal and he was later with his payment.
Nobody should trust this liar anything because it's obvious he can't keep his word.
Oh yes, I almost forgot to say that I am still waiting to receive 0.1 BTC payment from him.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1462
Yes, I'm an asshole
Quoting what saxydev said on the other thread so anyone can catch up and get the relevance with my post below,

I will share it to a trusted person outside the gang of ShitBaboonNewsletterBitcoin aka GazetaBitcoin to verify the transaction, my personal specification is that it is a private matter and I do not make public any of my own addresses or information related to any of transactions public. Working in my domain you may understand that sharing an address is the same as doxing yourself.

[...]
You have a point sending straight to him would be easy and the best way. But I don't want to please others. He is not capable of keeping his own wallet safe, it is not my problem.

If someone is really interested and doing their role as part of the community, can text me and I will share it in private.

Yet nobody did it, why? Well, not even clue. Perhaps, nobody cares. They just complain in other's threads.

I have zero knowledge of monero, so guide and correct me if I'm wrong, but basically if we want to prove this payment and get to the end of this case, we can do it from https://localmonero.co/blocks with txID 6cb0178cd40e70339bf83d80a71936d14721954958679ea4a910349562900e95, so the complete web address would be,

Code:
https://localmonero.co/blocks/search/6cb0178cd40e70339bf83d80a71936d14721954958679ea4a910349562900e95

which would bring us to this page,



Where the "Recipient's Monero address" is what's given by the OP, 4B5P6RUPjedUu6xMavFrEthePYfgaEmnMHsoRKQf4jC1b2JYShUZdKS1FtDg7Y5phbQnhRY4MoLKZi6 KgR2emFeg9DC3HCG and the TX private key is what saxydev would provide, he wrote and I quote, "to a trusted person outside the gang of [...] GazetaBitcoin"

Am I correct?

If I am, then I'll ask saxydev, do I fall under that criteria? You asked if anyone would do their role as part of the community, and here I am, volunteering purely to get this case closed. I don't think I'm on any gang on this forum, and I would like to call myself --well, self proclaimed as it is-- trustworthy enough. Would you PM me that TX private key which will allows all of us to see the truth behind this case?

And to any other members, as I am aware that screenshot can be edited, but suppose saxydev kept his words and provide me with the TX private key so that I can confirm that the payment is indeed sent --or didn't sent-- would the screenshot provided by me enough as an evidence? I can assure you all that I won't bother editing the screenshots --aside from cropping and obscuring anything that can be used to identify me-- as whatever shown wouldn't benefits or detrimental to me.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
https://ibb.co/GRQ2jbp

take it. you know the resources I pulled to get the key? neah, resync your wallet, it's there

block: 2813799

@saxydev, I already answered this in another thread, but just in case you missed it, here's a reminder: to prove a payment on the Monero network, you'll need to show two things:

1. The correct TX ID
2. The secret transaction key (tx key) from your wallet


These details do not reveal your identity or the source of the payment in any way. It just proves that recipient received money. So, let's put the privacy concerns to rest and focus on getting the payment proven. Screenshots or any other forms of evidence that can be easily manipulated or altered are irrelevant in this case.
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 5

Kid. Fking hell dont be an idiot.

First thats not the txd.
Second don't put your private key in the browser just like that..

Going to sleep, brb 48-72 hrs

that's the info i got from you, from the deleted screenshot that you sent.




an this is the newest screenshot you sent.



its block 2820718 not block 2813799

How can the 1st screenshot TxID: 6cb0178cd40e70339bf83d80a71936d14721954958679ea4a910349562900e95  says 7001 confirmation and have my address in it and you said in block 2813799
But on 2nd Screenshot TxID: 6cb0178cd40e70339bf83d80a71936d14721954958679ea4a910349562900e95 says 107 confirmation and block 2820718

 Huh Huh


hero member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 681
Second don't put your private key in the browser just like that..
His funds wont get stolen even if someone knows his private viewkey. Worst case scenario is someone can view his balance.
@OP, get the correct txid from saxydev and try this alternatively in monero client: How to prove a payment was made
In monero-wallet-cli:
Code:
check_tx_key TXID TXKEY ADDRESS
member
Activity: 429
Merit: 52
since've 0 knowledge on monero i might need some assistance
You may try to check on https://xmr.llcoins.net/checktx.html (github link) to verify if the transaction contains a output with your public address. You need a tx hash, priv. viewkey, and your (recepient's) monero address.


However by checking @saxydev's trust feedbacks, I think you got caught up with the wrong person.
got this result: Failed to get transaction data! Perhaps LocalMonero is down?  Huh


Kid. Fking hell dont be an idiot.

First thats not the txd.
Second don't put your private key in the browser just like that..

Going to sleep, brb 48-72 hrs
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 5
since've 0 knowledge on monero i might need some assistance
You may try to check on https://xmr.llcoins.net/checktx.html (github link) to verify if the transaction contains a output with your public address. You need a tx hash, priv. viewkey, and your (recepient's) monero address.


However by checking @saxydev's trust feedbacks, I think you got caught up with the wrong person.
got this result: Failed to get transaction data! Perhaps LocalMonero is down?  Huh
hero member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 681
since've 0 knowledge on monero i might need some assistance
You may try to check on https://xmr.llcoins.net/checktx.html (github link) to verify if the transaction contains a output with your public address. You need a tx hash, priv. viewkey, and your (recepient's) monero address.


However by checking @saxydev's trust feedbacks, I think you got caught up with the wrong person.
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 5
Dude, you have been paid. And I said in the other thread that I will send to others to check only in private, not in public. Resync your wallet whatever, it is not my problem

My discord chat are open 24 hours, thats not in public.
still you never send TxID and Tx Key to me.
I've proof it that my balance are 0, now proof it if you really have sent it.

https://ibb.co/GRQ2jbp

take it. you know the resources I pulled to get the key? neah, resync your wallet, it's there

block: 2813799

i got your deleted screenshot that you sent on discord,
the transaction id was censored, but the one that in the url not.
Transaction ID:  6cb0178cd40e70339bf83d80a71936d14721954958679ea4a910349562900e95
https://blockchair.com/monero/transaction/6cb0178cd40e70339bf83d80a71936d14721954958679ea4a910349562900e95
when i tried to search it, it belong to other block https://www.exploremonero.com/block/2820718 from 3 days ago
not from https://www.exploremonero.com/block/2813799
since've 0 knowledge on monero i might need some assistance from @FatFork and the other to validating this.
member
Activity: 429
Merit: 52
Dude, you have been paid. And I said in the other thread that I will send to others to check only in private, not in public. Resync your wallet whatever, it is not my problem

My discord chat are open 24 hours, thats not in public.
still you never send TxID and Tx Key to me.
I've proof it that my balance are 0, now proof it if you really have sent it.

https://ibb.co/GRQ2jbp

take it. you know the resources I pulled to get the key? neah, resync your wallet, it's there

block: 2813799
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 5
Dude, you have been paid. And I said in the other thread that I will send to others to check only in private, not in public. Resync your wallet whatever, it is not my problem

My discord chat are open 24 hours, thats not in public.
still you never send TxID and Tx Key to me.
I've proof it that my balance are 0, now proof it if you really have sent it.
member
Activity: 429
Merit: 52
Dude, you have been paid. And I said in the other thread that I will send to others to check only in private, not in public. Resync your wallet whatever, it is not my problem
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 5
What happened::

  • Doing some work for saxydev and earned $90 in XMR (he also confirmed that i earned $90).
  • Payment was promised will be send on 25th January.
  • On 24th January he reached me to re-confirmed if my address are correct or not, he will going on vacation and his financial department will send the money on 25th January.
  • But never received it till now.
  • Saxydev claimed he already sent the payment on 3rd February and the issue is on my wallet. 1
  • I asking for TxID and transaction key, He says he will install the wallet and send it to me after 5-10 hours of syncing.
  • By the time i wrote this its already 32 hours and i haven't received the TxID and Transaction Keys. 
  • He claimed that he already checked his wallet and again he claimed that he already sent the money and its already on my wallet. 2
  • He said he willing to share the TxID and Transaction Keys to some trusted member to check it but he never send me the TxID and Transaction Keys. 3



(presumably)Scammers Profile Link:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/saxydev-3410716

Reference Link:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/looking-for-someone-to-find-events-while-googling-5436425

Amount (presumably)Scammed:
$90

Payment Method:
XMR

Proof of Payment:
I'm the recipient 

PM/Chat Logs:
Discord Chat Logs: https://pastebin.com/yPuXVmcR
Screenshots:
https://imgur.com/GgXt22n
https://imgur.com/gMLAspU
https://imgur.com/XiUOaSE
https://imgur.com/3vJWWOn
https://imgur.com/l0Cfxix
https://imgur.com/jH7cctc
https://imgur.com/Bp7ki6e
https://imgur.com/bqPNmQv
https://imgur.com/1NJnPwJ
https://imgur.com/2j14YrP
https://imgur.com/1SM86Vx
https://imgur.com/rrrT0ON
https://imgur.com/4qbAdjt
https://imgur.com/XBvYVwx
https://imgur.com/Y7VIt2E
https://imgur.com/Th3uzwb
https://imgur.com/RYg8lOL
https://imgur.com/VzYjYij
https://imgur.com/CEgfB68
https://imgur.com/C8ENvFt
https://imgur.com/gBnPifR
https://imgur.com/FnacrZf

Link to all 23 screenshoots in one album: https://imgur.com/a/kKSWwVJ


Additional Notes:
1https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61747448
2https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61750857
3https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61750857 and https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61751340
Jump to: