Topic: Donald Trump convicted 34 counts. (Read 539 times)

You really think they could go even higher after they've just been getting higher and higher for the past 3 years? 

The Deep State Dems are finding it difficult to know where to turn next. If they incarcerate Trump, his numbers will go even higher. If they don't, his legal team is working on getting his gag order lifted. Most important is the fact that legal people are figuring out ways to to fight the conviction that will work.

Yale Law Professor Jed Rubenfeld (whose wife is the “Tiger Mom“) says that Donald Trump’s ‘hush money’ conviction has serious legal issues, giving the former president multiple legal avenues to overturn the verdict - Straight Down the Middle — The Trump Verdict —Ep. 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u23t__ysVjU.

And now back from dumBAss land and into the world of actual law being practiced. Trump is now going to undergo an assessment to determine what sentencing goes with the guilty unanimous veredict. Yet even here he has requested and obtained two quite unusual privileges: he gets to have his attorney during the questioning by the probation officers and he can interview on-line from Mar-a-Shit mansion. I guess the judge is making sure he does argue he was not properly advised.



The type of questions on these interviews are pretty much standard.

The biggest reason why Trump is having trouble is that he didn't stand as a man in court, unrepresented, but present. Once Trump became a client of an attorney, he became a ward of the court - https://www.youarelaw.org/Download/CorpusJurisSecundum-AttorneyClient.pdf.

This doesn't mean he can't have attorneys as co-counsel. It means that as co-counsel they can't speak for him in court. But they can advise him on the private side, and he can do his own speaking, which he is well able to do. If he entered his paperwork at the beginning of the trial, just like the prosecutor did, the judge wouldn't be able to gag him. Why not? Because it would have been as much his court as the prosecutor's or judge's. Trump would be legally able to impose on the judge or prosecutor any Contempt of Court. Why? Because it would be his (Trump's) court as much as anybody else's.

Also, he should have entered his paperwork as a man, not as a representation of the name on the prosecutor's indictment. The prosecutor's indictment would say something like, "Donald J. Trump." Trump's paperwork would say, "donald j. trump," showing that he was a man, not the name on a piece of paper.

At the beginning of the trial, Trump should have given his paperwork to the judge via the bailiff. The paperwork would start out by saying something like the following, thereby making the court as much his court as the judge... thereby turning the judge back into the referee that a judge's position should be. The beginning of the paperwork would read:

---

i, man, donald j. trump, do hereby express that i am present in this court, and that i do not accept representation of any form in this court.

FURTHER, i, man, donald j. trump, do hereby require any man/woman who has been damaged by me, to show the damage, and take the stand so that i can face my accuser with questions about his/her accusations.

FURTHER, i, man, donald j. trump, blah, blah, blah, blah, etc.


SIGNED: donald j. trump

---

Doing it this way, Trump would have the option of bringing damages into the open, giving him the chance to pay off any damages that were real.

It would not give any court authority over him. His co-counsel would have looked into this, and would be prepared with methods for de-fanging and de-clawing anything the judge might attempt to contradict Trump with.

A bigger issue is his attorneys are listening to him.

But the biggest reason Trump is having trouble is that he got sloppy and didn't cover up all of his crimes very well - which isn't surprising considering he hires criminals to commit crime for him but only know how to do it the old fashioned way.  Like Michael Cohen visiting a bank in person to set up accounts so Trump can do some fraud.  Hire a smarter criminal that knows how things work today and the the whole porn star problem goes away with one transaction on a block chain.

The only reason why Trump is having trouble is, he is listening to his attorneys. When you make a contract with an attorney, you become a ward of the court system. You have thereby let them make your decisions for you.

CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM is the second most popular legal encyclopedia in America. Read what it says about attorney client relationships - https://www.youarelaw.org/Download/CorpusJurisSecundum-AttorneyClient.pdf. If Trump decides to get rid of his attorneys and go the lawful route, he will have thousands of additional options besides the legal ones.

You are totally missing US law. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=corpus+juris+secundum%2C+client+of+an+attorney&ia=web

I am sorry to hear that you are too busy to laugh. I am sure that you can still make most out of this beautiful summer by going outside and "though the grass". But contrary to popular opinion; if you can type something, it doesn't make it true. In fact in your case,it's most likely lying and ignoring all the evidence.

I would love the idea of eating popcorn and watch you in court by the way, to defend your weird ideas how laws don't apply to you or Trump, but in reality i have better things to do. Good luck with your upcoming month when Trump gets sentenced.

Trump obeyed the laws of his country. You are so far off that it would be laughable if somebody had time to laugh. Trump has a thousand options open to him.


Mistrial? Trump 'Hush Money' Judge Suggests Juror May Have Had Predetermined Guilty Verdict

---

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/mistrial-trump-hush-money-judge-suggests-juror-may-have-had-predetermined-guilty-verdict
The judge in the Trump 'hush money' case, Juan Merchan,  just issued a very strange note to both parties indicating that a comment made on the court's Facebook page suggests that one of the jurors may have arrived at a 'guilty' verdict before the end of the trial, and told a family member.

"My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted. Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!" reads the Facebook post highlighted by Merchan.
...

---

Never ever, right? I don't know if you know what "criminal indictment", or "politically motivated" means, or is it that maybe you just haven't paid attention to his past.

And using any means, like expecting to him obey the law of the country he was a president of? Maybe you should revisit the reasons he is going to court again and study the overwhelming evidence against him. If that isn't enough, ask of anyone that's worked for him what's he been up to, because that's been done already by officials, and that's the reason he is going trough this. This wouldn't be such a big deal in news if he hasn't been a president of united states and part of the "Elite", that he is raving about. And ironically he seems to have a fetish for suing people, so maybe he likes this.

Regardless of the motivation, if he did it he did it.

If you want to have a presidential candidate with better chances of not being convicted, try to choose someone that has a cleaner record because Trump thinks himself above the law and has given plenty of evidence of it. I just do not understand we have to put up with someone who has probably broken the law over and over when there are many possible candidates with a proper service record. It is insulting for the US citizens.

Seems we could have imminent drama. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna156128

The New York judge overseeing Donald Trump's hush money trial has asked attorneys in the case about a social media post purporting to preview the former president's guilty verdict.

“Today, the Court became aware of a comment that was posted on the Unified Court System’s public Facebook page and which I now bring to your attention,” Judge Juan Merchan wrote in a letter dated Friday.

“My cousin is a juror and said Trump is getting convicted,” the post stated, according to Merchan's letter. “Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!!”

Merchan said that the comment, which was attributed to a user identified as Michael Anderson, was "now labeled as one week old," and was posted in response to a routine notice from the court posted on May 29 about oral arguments unrelated to proceedings in Trump’s case.

When a defendant who has been convicted by a jury but has not yet been sentenced learns of alleged jury misconduct, he can move to set aside the verdict under New York criminal procedure law. If a defendant can prove that jury misconduct “may have affected a substantial right of the defendant,” the remedy is a new trial.

NBC News has not verified the claims made in the comment or the identity of the user who published the post, which has since been deleted. NBC News also hasn't independently confirmed the comment’s existence.

A Trump campaign official said "we're investigating" when asked about Merchan's letter.

Attorneys for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday afternoon, nor did a spokesperson for the Manhattan district attorney's office.

Trump was convicted last month on 34 counts of falsifying business records tied to reimbursing Cohen for hush money paid to Daniels in the final days of the 2016 campaign. Trump had pleaded not guilty in the case and denied Daniels’ claims that she had a sexual encounter with him in 2006. Trump’s sentencing in the case is scheduled for July 11.

lol - the man is a real estate developer in NYC for more than 70 years without a single criminal indictment.  He kicks Hillary’s ass in the presidential election and suddenly he has over 90.  This isn’t politically motivated at all.

The reality is he turned on the corrupt political establishment and they’re out to destroy him for it using any means necessary.

Fun fact.

While Trump was president the DOJ prosecuted someone for their involvement in illegal campaign contributions in the form of hush money payments to a porn star right before an election.

That someone was Trumps lawyer.  And he served prison time for it.

Trump was referred to as "unindicted co-conspirator #1" in the the indictment.

Maybe the person to blame for all of this is....Trump?  You know, the guy who's been found guilty and keeps ranting about how he did nothing wrong even though he obviously broke the law to help himself win the 2020 election and then committed fraud every month for the next year (breaking more laws) to cover it up.

Imagine the damage to our judicial system if they just let someone get away with something like that who has shown no remorse and then gone on to commit more crimes to overturn the results of the next election, and then even more crimes after he left office.

Could you imagine the outrage if Hillary or Biden did that?

TLDR version (that makes sense) please?

While also maintaining the civility as the Op has said, I don't think the regime after Trumps has been capable to withstand the economical and civil pressures on the circumstances to create new values that's to make a better difference.
All the convictions on Trump might end up being an illusion but propagandas structuring to impose fear on Trump's delegates so that their efforts of voting for him doesn't be a waste after his conviction judgement.
But politically we still can't underrate what's seems impossible because his conviction could be arraign after his may emerge the winner and then get sentenced or judged according to the so political law demands.

My concern is the damage these bogus politically motivated lawsuits have inflicted upon our judicial system.  The Republic may not recover from this level of corruption.   

Oh yes, look at the wild swings in the polls:


Do you think he's considering changing strategies in his other criminal trials?  If he were to stop delaying today, he'd probably be able to be found guilty by at least 2 more juries before the election, possibly 3!

Trump just keeps on getting stronger and stronger and stronger. The more they try to destroy him, the stronger he gets. The whole world is backing Trump. Write him in if your State doesn't have him on the ballot.

Will the US break apart? Lots of people in America want to secede - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=percent+of+people+in+favor+of+secession&iax=images&ia=images. But they might wait for a while if Trump gets back in.


The World Rallies To President Trump's Defense In Aftermath Of Kangaroo Court Verdict

---

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/world-rallies-president-trumps-defense-aftermath-kangaroo-court/
While Biden was expecting the American people to at long last turn on President Trump, in fact the opposite occurred: they rallied to his side, at a rate previously unseen in modern presidential history.  President Trump's fundraising haul since last week's conviction has been historic: he has hauled in hundreds of millions of dollars of cash.

In May, President Trump's campaign posted its highest figure ever – $141 million – far outpacing Joe Biden, who has been struggling mightily to prevent the bloodletting of voters across every demographic group to President Trump's corner.

Indeed, on the same day the 45th President held his press conference at Trump Tower to denounce the Biden-Bragg show verdict as but the latest attempt in the Left's never-ending saga to derail MAGA and rig another presidential election, new polling came out showing the 45th President with a 6-point nationwide advantage over Biden, and leading in all six key battleground states this cycle: Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Nevada.

While Biden's problems are bad on the domestic front, they get arguably worse overseas.  The international order has descended into chaos under Biden's stewardship.

Western countries have been ravaged by strife and warfare in Eastern Europe and the Middle East to levels not seen since World War II.  Meanwhile, autocratic regimes like China, Iran, and Russia have been empowered, relative to the United States and Europe, which have been brought to near financial and cultural ruin by the suicidal policies of the Biden government.
...

---

Right, in the sense that it was an unrecorded/declared illegal "donation".

If Trump doesn't argue that the whole thing is made up, then the porn star doesn't have to describe what it was like to be looking at the ceiling with Trump on top of her with his small mushroom shaped condomless penis inside of her.  None of those details were relevant until opening statements when Trumps team claimed she was lying.  Once that claim is made, the prosecutors get to have her explain what happened and a let the jury decide if she's credible or not.




He should've used campaign funds.  Then it would've been fine.  Problem is he used his personal funds to help his campaign because he didn't want to follow campaign finance laws. Then he committed fraud to hide it, because he knew what he did was illegal, by funneling the money through Michael Cohen and a Fake Company.