Topic: Donetsk, Kharkov, Lugansk - way to Russia. - page 117. (Read 734725 times)

Kremlin is not in Donbass, stop with off topic.


Put on google - "Кaк зapaбoтaть нa блoгe блoггepy" и бyдeт тeбe cчacтьe, тo ecть люди, кoтopыe плaтят зa пocты.

How Kremlin internet trolls work: St.Peterburg office, 250 staff, 10 mil budget, 24*7

http://www.dp.ru/a/2014/10/27/Borotsja_s_omerzeniem_mo/

I guess they're preparing to take down another civil plane, 3rd one. This is all what they have learned to do during last 20 years.

What morons, S-300 at Odessa that says ukrgas



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdhtmLN7VoI#t=27

They are supporting Putin for some 2018 World Cup tix. LOL

Please, post only Donbass related info.

Putin got talent (and US movie star support): http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xg3k7j_poutine-chante-devant-delon-depardieu-sharon-stone_webcam#from=embediframe

Kevin Costner, Kurt Russel, Mickey Rourke, Sharon Stone, Ornella Muti, Goldie Hawn, Alain Delon, Vincent Cassel, Monica Bellucci and Gérard Depardieu.

Don't blame him for his words, it is the ape blood talking,

a very hard thing to genetically engineer out. 

I'm not disputing that the Masons and banksters of NYC/London/Paris conspired to remove the Tsar.  That history is well known in John Birch Society circles.

How many times do I have to repeat that before you understand it?

That does not change the fact that those conspirators had enough help from Russian 'useful idiots' to make their red revolution a success.

Your stubbornness and ugliness prove you don't deserve freedom.

Overwhelming Russian support for the Bolshevik revolution? Haha what a nonsense, take your drugs buddy.

"In The Shadow of the Hermes",

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIuW-vNQsQI

Hmm, it seems this clip was effective. Your post is so fake.  I saw the typical CIA CONTRIVED ANGER when cornered, another red herring. It took you so long to get angry but you were online all along for two hours. That means you saw the clip & decided it "dangerous" to your drama. Frankly, you should change your tactics, that is too predictable.

Actually, that clip was tame compared to the books because it refrained from stating that Lenin, Trotsky, Volodarsky, Kerensky, etc. were all Jewish (Lenin was a mixture of Kalmyk, Jewish & German). They pushed the Cheka which killed millions in their Red Terror barbarities against the Russians. But that use of the Jews is typical of the tactics of the Western power operators behind them: they use aggrieved minorities to subvert the majority, like they are doing in abusing now the inferiority complex of the Right SEctor (the modern Bolsheviks).

Again this clip is from Sweden. Juri Lina wrote the masterpiece which explained how Soviet Union was actually a creation of WEstern financial conspirationists who paid for a revolution to oust and kill the Tsar- "Under The Sign of the Scorpion". He explained everything there, that the Russians were the major victims, not the perpetrators, and more than a hundred million Russians were killed in the crime- most of all, he mentioned references which you can track for more enlightenment.

He also did this film - "In The Shadow of the Hermes", this is a nice watch preparatory to researching the whole series of crimes done by WEstern power schemers

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIuW-vNQsQI

Why do you need to be so insulting?  Every posts from you is 'blah blah intellectual dishonesty blah blah mental capacity.'

I've already explained I've known of Masonic NYC/London/Paris banker support for Bolsheviks since I was a little kid, and you still try to lecture me?  That just makes you look bad, like you need to try too hard to belittle.

You told me to read Solzhenitsyn, and then moved the goalposts to a specific book because I threw a cutting quote regarding Russian complicity with Bolshevism from him in your face.   

Maybe Solzhenitsyn is right, and people like you do not deserve freedom?

TIME FOR ENLIGHTENMENT

From Sweden, Juri Lina wrote the masterpiece which explained how Soviet Union was actually a creation of WEstern financial conspirationists who paid for a revolution to oust and kill the Tsar- "Under The Sign of the Scorpion". He explained ceverything there, that the Russians were the major victims, not the perpetrators, and more than a hundred million Russians were killed in the crime- most of all, he mentioned references which you can track for more enlightenment.

He also did a short film - "In The Shadow of the Hermes", which is just enlightening...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIuW-vNQsQI


 

The ruSSian spring -  video about brutal beatings of civilians by terrorists Donetsk "Oplot"



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le0HdQcLZLw#t=165

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_uooey15gM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2X4zvPJJkVI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQJv-sOeEU0

http://obozrevatel.com/crime/30978-v-seti-poyavilos-video-zverskih-izbienij-mirnyih-zhitelej-donetska-terroristami-oplota.htm

You know, you should learn intellectual honesty so you become more human.

You turn a potentially intellectual discussion into a futile exercise of "Red Herring".

You should read Solzhenitsyn's "200 Years Together" & you'll be wiser instead of harping on that prepared quotation for propaganda.

BTW, I speak French & German so I was able to read "200 Years Together" because it is only available in the WEst in those two languages. BUT IT IS NOT AVAILABLE IN ENGLISH. His "Gulag Archipelago" which was used by the WEst as propaganda against the Soviet Union sold 30 million but the newer European bestseller is not available in English. Some activists try to post English translation on the NET but they were immediately deleted by the powers behind the Internet. ESpecially Chapter 15, which is about the Bolsheviks.

Believe it or not, the last major work of a Nobel Prize writer is forbidden to be read in English.


 

Yes, I've known all that since I was in 7th grade.  Despite appearances to the contrary not all Americans are uneducated, just as not all Russians are bullies and thugs.  

But the Russian people still bear some responsibility for supporting and abiding the Bolsheviks.

That is the point made crystal clear by the quote I provided.


I admire Solzhenitsyn for his willingness to be frank about the shortcomings of his people in resisting Communist tyranny, something many other Russians should seek to emulate instead of protecting their seemingly fragile egos.

There is no overwhelming support among the Russians of the Bolshevik Revolution. In Juri Lina's book, you will realize why.

The Bolshevik revolution was actually 85% extremist Jewish and the financiers (Jacob Schiff , etc) were Jewish so the Soviet Union, at face value,  was a primarily Jewish enterprise. But we know now, it might have been because these greedy financiers happened to be Jewish & they were only manipulating the innate hatred of their fellow minority Jews so they could be used to terrorize the Russians (just like they are manipulating now the inferiority complex of the Ukrainians to hate the Russians).

More than a 100 million Russians were killed by the Soviets to make the Russians obey. Calculations predict that Russia should have a 300 million population by now if the Soviet Union did not interrupt its normal history.

I quote some parts:

If we can somehow ascribe Max Warburg's financing of Lenin to German "patriotism," it was certainly not "patriotism" which inspired Schiff, Morgan, Rockefeller and Milner to bankroll the Bolsheviks. Both Britain and America were at war with Germany and were allies of Czarist Russia. To free dozens of German divisions to switch from the Eastern front to France and kill hundreds of thousands of American and British was nothing short of treason.

In the Bolshevik Revolution we see many of the same old faces that were responsible for: creating the Federal Reserve System, initiating the graduated income tax, setting up the tax-free foundations and pushing us into WWI. However, if you conclude that this is anything but coincidental, your name will be immediately expunged from the Social Register.

No revolution can be successful without organization and money. "The downtrodden masses" usually provide little of the former and none of the latter. But Insiders at the top can arrange for both.

What did these people possibly have to gain in financing the Russian Revolution? What did they have to gain by keeping it alive and afloat, or, during the 1920's by pouring millions of dollars into what Lenin called his New Economic Program, thus saving the Soviets from collapse?

Why would these "capitalists" do all this? If your goal is global conquest, you have to start somewhere. It may or may not have been coincidental, but Russia was the one major European country without a central bank. In Russia, for the first time, the Communist conspiracy gained a geographical homeland from which to launch assaults against the other nations of the world. The West now had an enemy.

In the Bolshevik Revolution we have some of the world's richest and most powerful men financing a movement which claims its very existence is based on the concept of stripping of their wealth men like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Schiffs, Warburgs, Morgans, Harrimans, and Milners. But obviously these men have no fear of international Communism. It is only logical to assume that if they financed it and do not fear it, it must be because they control it. Can there be any other explanation that makes sense?

Remember that for over 150 years it has been standard operating procedure of the Rothschilds and their allies to control both sides of every conflict. You must have an "enemy" if you are going to collect from the King. The East-West balance-of-power politics is used as one of the main excuses for the socialization of America. Although it was not their main purpose, by nationalization of Russia the Insiders bought themselves an enormous piece of real estate, complete with mineral rights, for somewhere between $30 and $40 million.

We can only theorize on the manner in which Moscow is controlled from New York, London and Paris. Undoubtedly much of the control is economic, but certainly the international bankers have an enforcer arm within Russia to keep the Soviet leaders in line. The organization may be SMERSH, the international Communist murder organization described in testimony before Congressional Committees and by Ian Fleming in his James Bond books. For although the Bond novels were wildly imaginative, Fleming had been in British Navy intelligence, maintained excellent intelligence contacts around the world and was reputedly a keen student of the international conspiracy.

The Bolshevik Revolution was financed by the Kuhn, LOeb, Co. of New York through Jacob Schiff.

Lenin, Trotsky, etc. are just professional revolutionaries paid by the Anglo-Zionists. It was not a Russian occupation, the Russians were occupied.

You can start your reading with this one.

http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=NoneDare&C=4#Bolshevik

I'll check out Juris Lina, and am already familiar with the other two.

My points are that however much Russians insist on claiming to be the King of the Victims of Communism

1) the USSR was the result of overwhelming Russian support for the Bolshevik revolution and subsequent obedience thereof
2) Russia has all the hyrdocarbons and sells it to dirt-poor Ukraine