Stating facts isn't the bullshit part.
The bullshit part is when you tell people "you won't ever break even" when YOU DON'T KNOW THAT.
Did you tell those people that by your same calculations, mining would be considered unproftaible in may? In april? In march?
Because all these calculations are the exact same calculations done for the last year, and these calculations say very little, because the people who do these calculations (you!) cannot predct the single important factor that actually matters: price.
All ROI calculations are bogus because all ROI calculations make assumptions about price. Any conclusion other than "I don't know what's going to happen, your guess is as good as mine. Just depends where you think the price will go." is bullshit.
Sorry, I misspoke. I should have said that mining isn't profitable at the current price, and is less profitable than investing in bitcoins directly with increasing prices. The only thing I am predicting is that the network continues to grow at 4%/day, which it has on average over the last year. Almost perfectly.
Check out
http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ to see just how perfectly. As long as that remains the same, you won't make as much money as just investing in bitcoins.
So yes, I would have said in April that mining is less profitable too. If you had bought $1,000 in bitcoins you would have $20,000 in bitcoins now. Did anyone buying $1000 worth of mining equipment make $20,000 in that same time period?
[/quote]
I think it's cool that you're trying to learn how to be an amateur investment advisor.
So here's a lesson: risk is the single most important variable in an investment.
Buying bitcoins is, by a fundamental law of the universe, always going to be more
potentially profitable than mining because it is higher risk.
Mining is lower risk, but also lower expected returns.
An investor's choice of where they should put their money and time depends on their risk profile.
Is the investor looking for a high risk, high yield investment, and is comfortable taking losses but still acting rationally? He should buy bitcoins.
Is the investor running tighter on money and can't afford to lose much, but also isn't aiming to make more? Is the investor willing to invest personal time and effort managing his investment? If yes he should consider mining.
Variables that matter for deciding about an investment in bitcoins:
- Your risk profile
- Your beliefs about future price
- Your skills (Are you capable of trading wisely? Avoiding panic? Not getting scammed?)
- Your interests (Does system administration turn you on?)
Things that don't matter:
- Other people's calculations about difficulty increases
- Bogus ROI calculations based on unknowable assumptions
- Stuff your competition says to discourage you from competing with them
[/quote]
Difficulty increases aren't just an assumption, look at the graph of the last year. What I am saying is that as long as difficulty increases are growing at the current rate, mining will never be as profitable as investing directly. At the current rate, you have to have an increase in bitcoin value to compensate for the increase in difficulty to just break even. So indirectly, you are speculating on the increasing value of bitcoins when you mine.
Now, if the growth of computing horsepower slows down to 2% or less, then mining obviously is the better option. Like for the first year of bitcoin's existence when the growth was flat.