Topic: Dooglus is supporting ponzis (Read 9919 times)

Speaking of faces:

QS:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15064730


Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

Original:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9568469


Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

Stripping smiley faces off quotes is a crime against intertubes punishable by 60 days of confinement to the Digital Goods board.

I see no coincidences here. Lots of Bitcoin gambling sites were buggy, and I helped to fix lots of them. I saw "were" because I no longer waste my time trying to help new sites. Experience shows that it almost never ends well.

As much as I hate feeding the troll, I guess I should respond to the 3 cases he mentioned:

1. The balloon site offered me a bounty when I reported their bug, but never paid it. I didn't do anything other than play their game to discover the bug. I published my interaction with the site owner. I wasn't extorting him. He offered a bounty freely, and later retracted the offer. The whole way he was running the site was scammy, offering payouts he wasn't bankrolled to be able to offer, etc.

2. The crypto-games site had a bug which someone else found. I never attempted to get a bounty for finding it, since I never found it. I remember the guy who did find it offering to share any bounty with me, but I don't remember ever asking for that, or ever receiving anything.

3. PRC had a bug bounty in place. I found a serious bug that was actively being exploited by an attacker and they took the longest time to pay the bounty. Note the winky face after the joke about "paying him off". That means it's a joke.

Omf'ngee the casino had a bug just like everything else this noob gets his hands on ! lol

The mudderFUDder is strong in you Doogie..

Coincidences ?

1 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=887220.0;all

2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11780050


3. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9565937 http://archive.is/aggeL


notes
1 - I was not able to locate any kind of bug bounty program for this site, which means that using the exploit (even if a W/D was not attempted) was unauthorized. The way that dooglus described his interaction with this person sounds a lot like extortion to me.

2 - dooglus was not directly extorting the owners of crypto-games, however I believe he at the very least was acting as an accomplice, and appears to have been extorting them via proxy as it was announced that dooglus would receive a percentage of the proceeds

3 - This is not a hacking attempt as there was an invitation to find the bug, however it is a clear extortion attempt (not sure if "attempt is the correct word as it was successful), as no agreement for payment was ever made in any way, however dooglus left negative trust with the intention of strong-arming the owner of that site into paying dooglus money that he was not due.

---

---

This was high on the list of what to possibly make "chapter 2", however as mentioned above, I had not put very much effort into gathering evidence/information as it appears that people generally do not care about dooglus' past indiscretions. I may create a thread about dooglus' history of extortion this weekend (IIRC there are more examples of this....I just need to spend more time into [re]gathering information).   

I'm not sure what you're saying here. Are you accusing me of abusing the trust system in some way? I barely use the trust system other than for marking scammer and promoters of scams as being untrustworthy. I don't see how you can call that abusive.

This whole thread is complaining about how I fixed some publicly available code which was incorrectly determining the sending address of Bitcoin (or CLAM, as it happened to be in this particular instance) transactions. In balance I think such a change is a good think. People copy an paste open source code snippets for use in their own projects. It's better to fix bugs in open source code when you see them because you never know what project the code will find itself in next. Correcting errors I find online is habitual for me. If that constitutes "shade activity" then so be it. I'm not going to stop fixing errors wherever I see them.

member with high rated reputation is in advantage, he "can afford" a couple of shady activities and no one is going to say a bad word about him. This is a good example of trust rating abuse going on here. Sorry QS but you have a really little chance to convince people to give negative to dooglus, that's how it goes even if you are right and have proof.

IANAL, but, I heard that Dooglus lives in Canada.


Now that is a question that has been defying answer for several years now.



Is basically that your mudslinging tactics have failed.  No matter how many threads you start with your army of alts, you actually have to have some sort of content for your accusations to actually stick.

QS is like an experiment in echo-chamber crowd manipulation.  He makes a huge fuss and builds a hype machine with his alts, and people get riled up, but when you actually look for something concrete in what he's saying ...

That is what I believe yes. I have spent some time compiling information, however it is now late. I will post information/proof tomorrow evening after spending a little more time on it.

If a site does not have any kind of bug bounty program that invites people to find vulnerabilities in their site then finding such vulnerabilities would be accessing their computers without authorization. The question of personal gain is irrelevant to the question of accessing a computer system without authorization, although I do believe that dooglus does attempt to extort sites that he finds vulnerabilities to (that do not have bug bounty programs), and it often will make sense to pay the extortion due to his influence within the bitcoin gambling scene as well as the fact that it would probably not be smart to report him to law enforcement if you are a victim of his extortion because hosting a casino would probably be frowned upon by law enforcement.

   
The consensus in this thread seems to be that it does not matter what dooglus has done and/or does, so I have not bothered to put in the effort into gathering evidence and writing up a new thread if my warnings are only going to be ignored and cause people to call me a troll which I do not appreciate. Many people who are strongly against ponzis and any kind of support of ponzis have turned a blind eye to this situation, and I do not think others will react any differently to dooglus's other less-then-honest actions.

Dooglus is the root of all evil, have you not heard? He finds vulnerabilities in hacks competitors sites to help them destroy them for his personal gain.

QS, when is the sequel of this thread being posted? Surely it doesn't take 2 months to compile all of the 'proof' that you already have into another thread.

Ok, I'm gonna be the dumb donkey and ask - how is this relevant to anything? Is Dooglus now a hacker-extortionist?

I will just put this up for anyone to look at:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030

Ha ha, some angsty geek flinging shit cause Dooglus fixed bugs? How do you have time for so much BS.

OK well I've seen quite enough here. This is Dooglus' (partial) dox. He's the one in the red hat.



Do what you want with this (partial) dox everyone!

Until you can come up with proof that I am building a slave army of newborn babies I suggest you shut up about it.

Also (in an unrelated note) do you know where I can get good ear protection and bulk diaper supplies?

Well this is just a tad melodramatic. If I helped someone with a script that would help robots enslave newborn babies I would have terrible morals but it doesn't mean I would enslave babies myself.

So someone with 500k CLAMs started dumping after he saw that the price was starting to fall? That seems reasonable to me. He held as the price was going up, and decided to cash out when it started to fall.

You never actually make any claims, so it's impossible to argue with you, but are we to suppose that you think I am the same person as CreativeCuriosity (one of the original creators of CLAM), and that we're both the same person as the whale digger? "CreativeCuriosity + dooglus + digger = CreativeDooger" - very clever!

I know I'm neither of them, and I would put money of the other two also being different people.

I'm sure people would be interested to see any evidence you have of any of the three of us being the same person. Just stringing our names together doesn't count, sorry.

You seem to be an expert in all things dooglus

Whether or not you're playing dumb or are honestly ignorant of the historical precidents/facts may one day be determined. lol eg. the insider bankers and traders have been buying back peoples' investments for pennies on the dollar for centuries.

The following screenie shows 12.5 months of CLAM's market activity on Poloniex. It begins with the first dug wallet, DOGE, and ends with "the digger" (or should I say "the CreativeDooger" ) going public.

After 9+ months of climbing steadily, the price crashed 5-10 days BEFORE the notso CreativeDooger appeared. Not after.

So, that's a nice, cynical comment without much context.  As far as anyone knows, Dooglus, being the biggest holder of CLAM, took the biggest loss when the price dropped due to the whale digging.  If you're saying that he was the digger, then you're saying that he was crashing his own investment by selling so rapidly.  If you're saying he's some insider who knew about the digger, then you're saying that he took a huge loss while the digger sold.  I really think you're going to have to provide some further content to your cynicism if you want anyone else to understand whatever schemes you're imagining.

Go back on your meds. LOL.