Each account can only be used for 1 scam
Not true. But if you're saying that QS should take responsibility for up to 1 scam per sold account - I'm all for it. Let's start with Master-P.
The accounts he sold may not be used to scam, the code dooglus fixed will be used for the sole purpose of scamming, an I wrong?
Moving goalposts, I like it
Master-P WAS a scam, no "may" there. Is QS responsible or not?
He is not, did he know that the account would be used for scam?
When dooglus fixed the code, he knew that the sole purpose of the code would be to scam, am I wrong?
Yes, you are. Have you read the thread? Klye's site didn't scam anyone.
Kyle's site was actively deceiving people because it was trying to get people to believe that there was no risk to send money to his ponzi.
The script that dooglus designed is something that is primarily used to scam and is designed to scam. There are "legitimate" non-illegal uses for cocaine, however that does not mean that a cocaine producer (or maybe someone who designs a way to more efficiently produce cocaine) is not breaking the law.
And on the topic of Kyle's ponzi not scamming anyone, maybe you should look a little closer.
The address that players were to send their CLAM to was xWSg3afDSs7gRr5uDBWiUcpS7rJpmv8nra
On the first transaction the above received 1f1717abceb479a5948a3a5e8ee87731f3ff2543c586157d40d653fb108176c0, the following addresses used inputs to fund this transaction:
xH3Kh6WDTgdAnY3rAnMdonShezHLJgitt7
xHLd7SgohBXzqR271L3vZSr8Ha9dg8wE5K
xETZYYYZumiZLFxj2fqfzuftKaXLufYpsv
xDkh9AeqJBPxo1e3v12GZunJDbyXi7CL4C
xNogJskant1BznVFKvJEpSFGqmKVRLtaJg
x8XPofV7sUxACPPBvob6UPBxL6k8fCmmJ7
xWnYCzLWWfhkdqFp4hpAJWqyrbQd7J9jnV
The amount sent to the ponzi was 0.000337 CLAM
The amount the ponzi promised to return to the players was 125% of the amount sent, which works out to 0.00042125 CLAM.
None of the above addresses have received a transaction in this amount. (there is nothing in the thread that says that tx fees will be deducted from the amount sent). Therefore it is reasonable to say that Kyle scammed the first person who played at his ponzi out of 0.0004225 CLAM. Just because no one in the thread (or anywhere else) was complaining about getting scammed does not mean that no one was scammed.
@Your Point Is Invalid -- the dooglus supporters/fanboys are simply trying to derail this thread with off-topic
ad hominem attacks. Any discussion about me belongs in a different thread and these people know this, however these people choose to post them here to distract from the fact that dooglus did work on a script that was designed to steal from people.....in other word they are trying to distract from the fact that dooglus helped other scammers steal from others.