Pages:
Author

Topic: DoubleBot Signature Campaign [ High Payments ] (Read 5499 times)

hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1001
December 24, 2015, 09:44:08 AM
People, please do not promote a scam! If u will, u will get red trust rating for it by default trusted members.

The site hasnt scammed a single transaction and paid everyone till now. Moreover, please se the note above !! dont spam for your signature campaign

Yes TILL NOW!!!

Did you know that are the site like this that ruin the world around btc?
People can develop a lot of project and try becoming rich with stolen founds!
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
if you have eyes, I clearly posted any lucky winners mate via random num genertor or any idea I like .. and now I am locking thread until sunday .. and all were paid even without not enough posts bcz i am closing this week earlier .. anyways stay tuned and be sure to check back on sunday

seriously, we dont need ididots like you in campaign , anyways happy earning friends and serious note to nauro, please increase post quality else will decrease ur rate, sending PM too.

And Tyga I was thinking of taking u and increasing your rates but u seem to be a rubbish person, kicked of campaign if you were ever in !
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
This week's payments sent: https://blockchain.info/tx/728865b46472190da643f51bd9f14328f80ad9ed6d322938ddb033b1c2534f6d

Let me know if there are any problems Smiley

Regards

All good, confirmed with each address and amount in the transaction Smiley
Why vpscreator & dommic got the bonus but anyone of them dint post? Uhmmmm
I see many other participants have a good quality post but that two dint post any and win  the bonus? Why sir! I think that two its yours lol ..
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
This week's payments sent: https://blockchain.info/tx/728865b46472190da643f51bd9f14328f80ad9ed6d322938ddb033b1c2534f6d

Let me know if there are any problems Smiley

Regards

All good, confirmed with each address and amount in the transaction Smiley
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1001
https://keybase.io/masterp FREE Escrow Service
This week's payments sent: https://blockchain.info/tx/728865b46472190da643f51bd9f14328f80ad9ed6d322938ddb033b1c2534f6d

Let me know if there are any problems Smiley

Regards
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
All participants are getting paid today and new contest coming up for christmas Smiley , all will be paid even those who didnt make enogh posts ( dont worry we will ask u to make more posts in christmas week Wink )
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Username : kori
Current Post count : 188
Rank : full member
BTC address : 1ECLGujfWbisvS29Smzmmhwb77mhMPd6dw

Last member accepted and Ayoko has been removed from the campaign, as he demanded too high rates and when he agreed at lower, we had given Kori a place Smiley

Please note guys, the earlier u join the better rates u get, I will now lock this thread until friday Smiley as no new slots are available Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
yeah but i ain't speaking for the red but the thing is we all know it is only for the high payment and nothing to do with the scam and i cannot ignore that fact .

It's fine to make them Red for now but it shouldn't be visible forever , must be changed to neutral if the removed the sig regardless of the payment received cause if the user is not wearing any scamming sig then what are you warning newbies for ?

If they are getting punished just for the extra coins they tried to earn and had no intentions to scam then i wouldn't agree with that at least after seeing all the sig drama.

I have not updated this here, but yes I will change the rating to neutral once the signature is gone.
yup that would some wise and rightful decision from your side , or else the users would be pissed as hell for joining it .

I would have my doubts about this. This is a clear scam and users who wear this signature are doing so for money knowing that others will lose theirs. If they are willing to affect other people's money as long as they earn some themselves then I would think they won't have problems in the future being untrustworthy again. I would not trust someone who does that.

Besides warning newbies not to invest on this site now that negative trust would be a warning to deal with extreme caution with people willing to promote a scam site to earn some coin.
I will check the participants of this signature campaign and will add negative trust permanently unless they desist immediately before receiving their payment.

If people give money to an obvious scam, is that not their own fault? You're blaming the signature wearers (read: third-party, neutral advertisers) for what others choose to do. It's just crappy in and of itself. But to each his own, I guess.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
yeah but i ain't speaking for the red but the thing is we all know it is only for the high payment and nothing to do with the scam and i cannot ignore that fact .

It's fine to make them Red for now but it shouldn't be visible forever , must be changed to neutral if the removed the sig regardless of the payment received cause if the user is not wearing any scamming sig then what are you warning newbies for ?

If they are getting punished just for the extra coins they tried to earn and had no intentions to scam then i wouldn't agree with that at least after seeing all the sig drama.

I have not updated this here, but yes I will change the rating to neutral once the signature is gone.
yup that would some wise and rightful decision from your side , or else the users would be pissed as hell for joining it .

I would have my doubts about this. This is a clear scam and users who wear this signature are doing so for money knowing that others will lose theirs. If they are willing to affect other people's money as long as they earn some themselves then I would think they won't have problems in the future being untrustworthy again. I would not trust someone who does that.

Besides warning newbies not to invest on this site now that negative trust would be a warning to deal with extreme caution with people willing to promote a scam site to earn some coin.
I will check the participants of this signature campaign and will add negative trust permanently unless they desist immediately before receiving their payment.
I don't think anybody is stopping you to ? it was just our discussion and maybe we agreed cause are like minded Wink

The above explanation in the thread is more then clear for anyone to understand what the situation and condition is,there are no higher rank's or quality posters involved and even if any accusations arise in near future then most likely they are gonna get ignored.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1475
yeah but i ain't speaking for the red but the thing is we all know it is only for the high payment and nothing to do with the scam and i cannot ignore that fact .

It's fine to make them Red for now but it shouldn't be visible forever , must be changed to neutral if the removed the sig regardless of the payment received cause if the user is not wearing any scamming sig then what are you warning newbies for ?

If they are getting punished just for the extra coins they tried to earn and had no intentions to scam then i wouldn't agree with that at least after seeing all the sig drama.

I have not updated this here, but yes I will change the rating to neutral once the signature is gone.
yup that would some wise and rightful decision from your side , or else the users would be pissed as hell for joining it .

I would have my doubts about this. This is a clear scam and users who wear this signature are doing so for money knowing that others will lose theirs. If they are willing to affect other people's money as long as they earn some themselves then I would think they won't have problems in the future being untrustworthy again. I would not trust someone who does that.

Besides warning newbies not to invest on this site now that negative trust would be a warning to deal with extreme caution with people willing to promote a scam site to earn some coin.
I will check the participants of this signature campaign and will add negative trust permanently unless they desist immediately before receiving their payment.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Hello, I sent you a pm , please check Smiley

Kind regards
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
They're just advertising. When MSN/AOL advertise a car as being top of its class in reliability, and then it has a recall due to reliability issues, do you think they should also be charged since they are making a false claim, leading people into buying something they shouldn't?

Shorena (and others) stated that those negs will be removed, if they remove the signature (and don't get paid for it).


corrected something that was supposed to , you should not leave more than neutral to someone who is signaturing solely for the attrctive payouts ...
ignoring the logic is also some kind of misbehavior or not rightful.

A neutral rating is only helpful if someone checks the history. A negative rating is easier to spot and check.
yeah but i ain't speaking for the red but the thing is we all know it is only for the high payment and nothing to do with the scam and i cannot ignore that fact .

It's fine to make them Red for now but it shouldn't be visible forever , must be changed to neutral if the removed the sig regardless of the payment received cause if the user is not wearing any scamming sig then what are you warning newbies for ?

If they are getting punished just for the extra coins they tried to earn and had no intentions to scam then i wouldn't agree with that at least after seeing all the sig drama.

I have not updated this here, but yes I will change the rating to neutral once the signature is gone.
yup that would some wise and rightful decision from your side , or else the users would be pissed as hell for joining it .

copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
They're just advertising. When MSN/AOL advertise a car as being top of its class in reliability, and then it has a recall due to reliability issues, do you think they should also be charged since they are making a false claim, leading people into buying something they shouldn't?

Shorena (and others) stated that those negs will be removed, if they remove the signature (and don't get paid for it).


corrected something that was supposed to , you should not leave more than neutral to someone who is signaturing solely for the attrctive payouts ...
ignoring the logic is also some kind of misbehavior or not rightful.

A neutral rating is only helpful if someone checks the history. A negative rating is easier to spot and check.
yeah but i ain't speaking for the red but the thing is we all know it is only for the high payment and nothing to do with the scam and i cannot ignore that fact .

It's fine to make them Red for now but it shouldn't be visible forever , must be changed to neutral if the removed the sig regardless of the payment received cause if the user is not wearing any scamming sig then what are you warning newbies for ?

If they are getting punished just for the extra coins they tried to earn and had no intentions to scam then i wouldn't agree with that at least after seeing all the sig drama.

I have not updated this here, but yes I will change the rating to neutral once the signature is gone.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
They're just advertising. When MSN/AOL advertise a car as being top of its class in reliability, and then it has a recall due to reliability issues, do you think they should also be charged since they are making a false claim, leading people into buying something they shouldn't?

Shorena (and others) stated that those negs will be removed, if they remove the signature (and don't get paid for it).


corrected something that was supposed to , you should not leave more than neutral to someone who is signaturing solely for the attrctive payouts ...
ignoring the logic is also some kind of misbehavior or not rightful.

A neutral rating is only helpful if someone checks the history. A negative rating is easier to spot and check.
yeah but i ain't speaking for the red but the thing is we all know it is only for the high payment and nothing to do with the scam and i cannot ignore that fact .

It's fine to make them Red for now but it shouldn't be visible forever , must be changed to neutral if the removed the sig regardless of the payment received cause if the user is not wearing any scamming sig then what are you warning newbies for ?

If they are getting punished just for the extra coins they tried to earn and had no intentions to scam then i wouldn't agree with that at least after seeing all the sig drama.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
No new slots are available, sorry guys Wink
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
Username : kori
Current Post count : 188
Rank : full member
BTC address : 1ECLGujfWbisvS29Smzmmhwb77mhMPd6dw
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
They're just advertising. When MSN/AOL advertise a car as being top of its class in reliability, and then it has a recall due to reliability issues, do you think they should also be charged since they are making a false claim, leading people into buying something they shouldn't?

Shorena (and others) stated that those negs will be removed, if they remove the signature (and don't get paid for it).


corrected something that was supposed to , you should not leave more than neutral to someone who is signaturing solely for the attrctive payouts ...
ignoring the logic is also some kind of misbehavior or not rightful.

A neutral rating is only helpful if someone checks the history. A negative rating is easier to spot and check.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
Act #Neutral,Think y'self as a citizen of Universe
They're just advertising. When MSN/AOL advertise a car as being top of its class in reliability, and then it has a recall due to reliability issues, do you think they should also be charged since they are making a false claim, leading people into buying something they shouldn't?

Shorena (and others) stated that those negs will be removed, if they remove the signature (and don't get paid for it).


corrected something that was supposed to , you should not leave more than neutral to someone who is signaturing solely for the attrctive payouts ...
ignoring the logic is also some kind of misbehavior or not rightful.
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
They're just advertising. When MSN/AOL advertise a car as being top of its class in reliability, and then it has a recall due to reliability issues, do you think they should also be charged since they are making a false claim, leading people into buying something they shouldn't?

The people here are not "charged" for wearing that signature.
They are made aware of what they do via negative feedbacks.
Shorena (and others) stated that those negs will be removed, if they remove the signature (and don't get paid for it).

It's not that users in the campaign are sued or banned or something like that.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
I feel like this is a little unfair. Just because they are taking part in a paid signature campaign doesn't make them bad. That's like saying "every employee of Enron needs to go to prison because they should have known it was a scam."

Let's see what their sig says:
Code:
200% Payout ★ 100% Payouts Guaranteed

That's obivously a lie, because the ponzi will collapse at one point.
If they run around with such bullshit in their signature, there is indeed reason enough to tag them with a negative feedback until they remove it.


They're just advertising. When MSN/AOL advertise a car as being top of its class in reliability, and then it has a recall due to reliability issues, do you think they should also be charged since they are making a false claim, leading people into buying something they shouldn't?
Pages:
Jump to: