Can't log in to site or get a password reset email, it's almost like 25 character passwords broke the new site...and in case you think I'm doing it wrong..
"There is already a user registered with that e-mail!"
Topic: [DOWN] Bitlc.net - P2SH, No invalid blocks, Custom payouts, EU, 0% fee, LP - page 8. (Read 180924 times)
February 16, 2012, 01:50:53 PM
February 16, 2012, 01:14:52 PM
Payments have been down for almost a week now, what gives?
Every time I try to make a payment it returns:
This silence does not inspire confidence in bitlc. Why isn't there any news on this being posted? Every time I try to make a payment it returns:
Quote
Payments are temporarly disabled for a few days due to a wallet switch, please try again later.
February 15, 2012, 10:08:56 AM
Payments have been down for almost a week now, what gives?
Every time I try to make a payment it returns:
Every time I try to make a payment it returns:
Quote
Payments are temporarly disabled for a few days due to a wallet switch, please try again later.
February 13, 2012, 07:07:16 PM
Previously someone pointed out that we didn't show up on the vote-p2sh page on blockchain.info.
This was cause poolserverj didn't add the /P2SH/ string into the coinbase (even tho our bitcoind DO support P2SH!)
It's fixed now, with a bit of help from Eleuthria (or well, a heads up anyway).
After the weekend we will open up the deposit-bitcoin functionality and launch another service... that's for now - a secret
Yeah, I just noticed today that Bitlc can now be seen on the p2sh vote page. Looking forward to the new services as well This was cause poolserverj didn't add the /P2SH/ string into the coinbase (even tho our bitcoind DO support P2SH!)
It's fixed now, with a bit of help from Eleuthria (or well, a heads up anyway).
After the weekend we will open up the deposit-bitcoin functionality and launch another service... that's for now - a secret
February 12, 2012, 01:41:50 AM
Previously someone pointed out that we didn't show up on the vote-p2sh page on blockchain.info.
This was cause poolserverj didn't add the /P2SH/ string into the coinbase (even tho our bitcoind DO support P2SH!)
It's fixed now, with a bit of help from Eleuthria (or well, a heads up anyway).
After the weekend we will open up the deposit-bitcoin functionality and launch another service... that's for now - a secret
--
Regards, Jim
Bit LC Inc.
https://www.bitlc.net
This was cause poolserverj didn't add the /P2SH/ string into the coinbase (even tho our bitcoind DO support P2SH!)
It's fixed now, with a bit of help from Eleuthria (or well, a heads up anyway).
After the weekend we will open up the deposit-bitcoin functionality and launch another service... that's for now - a secret
--
Regards, Jim
Bit LC Inc.
https://www.bitlc.net
February 08, 2012, 04:26:45 PM
Jine,
Wondering what your current and long term plans are for pool hopping, I'm watching the hash rate trend from 400+ to 170 or so as a round gets longer and the obvious question is should I bounce on this train also since it appears you have more then 50% of your hash rate hopping.
Wondering what your current and long term plans are for pool hopping, I'm watching the hash rate trend from 400+ to 170 or so as a round gets longer and the obvious question is should I bounce on this train also since it appears you have more then 50% of your hash rate hopping.
"I'm watching the hash rate trend from 400+ to 170 or so as a round gets longer" If the 400 GH starts around share 1 and stops around < or = 43.5% it is not hopping...just an occasional miner trying to hop here or just trying it out here. if they miner at all over 100% difficulty, you make money... I mined in step with the 400 GH miners and DID NOT GET over 90% efficiency. So Pedro, did you even track your earning to see if you are losing...or just cry that the sky was falling? BTW, I am being dramatic...not trying to offend...just having a laugh
February 08, 2012, 04:04:13 PM
Jine,
Wondering what your current and long term plans are for pool hopping, I'm watching the hash rate trend from 400+ to 170 or so as a round gets longer and the obvious question is should I bounce on this train also since it appears you have more then 50% of your hash rate hopping.
Wondering what your current and long term plans are for pool hopping, I'm watching the hash rate trend from 400+ to 170 or so as a round gets longer and the obvious question is should I bounce on this train also since it appears you have more then 50% of your hash rate hopping.
"I'm watching the hash rate trend from 400+ to 170 or so as a round gets longer" If the 400 GH starts around share 1 and stops around < or = 43.5% it is not hopping...just an occasional miner trying to hop here or just trying it out here. if they miner at all over 100% difficulty, you make money... I mined in step with the 400 GH miners and DID NOT GET over 90% efficiency. So Pedro, did you even track your earning to see if you are losing...or just cry that the sky was falling?
February 07, 2012, 12:29:11 PM
Yes.
We're switching to DGM/PPLNS/other-payment method as soon as we figured out which one.
I'll launch a separate poll about this in a few hours...
/ Jim
We're switching to DGM/PPLNS/other-payment method as soon as we figured out which one.
I'll launch a separate poll about this in a few hours...
/ Jim
February 07, 2012, 07:53:29 AM
Jine,
Wondering what your current and long term plans are for pool hopping, I'm watching the hash rate trend from 400+ to 170 or so as a round gets longer and the obvious question is should I bounce on this train also since it appears you have more then 50% of your hash rate hopping.
Wondering what your current and long term plans are for pool hopping, I'm watching the hash rate trend from 400+ to 170 or so as a round gets longer and the obvious question is should I bounce on this train also since it appears you have more then 50% of your hash rate hopping.
February 06, 2012, 12:55:04 PM
No, we haven't banned any users what so ever in a long time.
If you're having issues with login, please contact us at [email protected]
--
Regards, Jim
Bit LC Inc
If you're having issues with login, please contact us at [email protected]
--
Regards, Jim
Bit LC Inc
February 06, 2012, 10:13:37 AM
did i just got banned?
February 06, 2012, 07:42:47 AM
Hi!
We DO support PS2H and I've been in contact with Gavin for the past month regarding this, we also discovered a bug in the P2SH backports (and main GIT tree) which didn't add tx-fees in new blocks.
I'm not sure the reason why we're not showing up, but all our blocks contains a vote for /P2SH/ as far as i know...
--
Regards, Jim
Bit LC Inc
+1We DO support PS2H and I've been in contact with Gavin for the past month regarding this, we also discovered a bug in the P2SH backports (and main GIT tree) which didn't add tx-fees in new blocks.
I'm not sure the reason why we're not showing up, but all our blocks contains a vote for /P2SH/ as far as i know...
--
Regards, Jim
Bit LC Inc
Thanks for the answer, you're running a great pool.
February 04, 2012, 03:55:09 PM
Hi!
We DO support PS2H and I've been in contact with Gavin for the past month regarding this, we also discovered a bug in the P2SH backports (and main GIT tree) which didn't add tx-fees in new blocks.
I'm not sure the reason why we're not showing up, but all our blocks contains a vote for /P2SH/ as far as i know...
--
Regards, Jim
Bit LC Inc
We DO support PS2H and I've been in contact with Gavin for the past month regarding this, we also discovered a bug in the P2SH backports (and main GIT tree) which didn't add tx-fees in new blocks.
I'm not sure the reason why we're not showing up, but all our blocks contains a vote for /P2SH/ as far as i know...
--
Regards, Jim
Bit LC Inc
February 02, 2012, 12:33:56 PM
Is Bitlc supporting P2SH right now (BIP 16)? I know it's supposed to, but I can't see it @ http://www.blockchain.info/p2sh yet. I would definitely like to see this support asap or I would consider changing to another pool. I hope everyone understands how important this is.
February 01, 2012, 07:32:52 PM
Thanks for the explanation. It would be nice if stats are delayed by a day or so in this pool, or a hopper unfriendly payment scheme could be implemented.
Stats delaying is not effective anymore, there are other ways to detect pool's new blocks.So, when the block is generated by the pool, it is being broadcast over the network, i.e. to the poolhopper directly connected to the pool daemon.
The poolhopper can determine that the block has been generated by the pool (and not relayed by the pool), if it haven't got the block from the other sources first.
February 01, 2012, 05:59:35 AM
Nice pool here looks good. Really appreciate the transparency and like the direction Bitlc seems to be going. Keep up the good work.
Those spikes are remarkably close to the rates on ABCProxyPool.
I saw that ABC admitted to using the pools hash power to pool hop but did abcpool ever come clean with wat pools they had been hopping? 
January 30, 2012, 06:42:00 PM
Thanks for the explanation. It would be nice if stats are delayed by a day or so in this pool, or a hopper unfriendly payment scheme could be implemented.
Stats delaying is not effective anymore, there are other ways to detect pool's new blocks. 
January 30, 2012, 02:01:56 PM
Those spikes are remarkably close to the rates on ABCProxyPool.
January 30, 2012, 12:52:52 AM
Thanks for the explanation. It would be nice if stats are delayed by a day or so in this pool, or a hopper unfriendly payment scheme could be implemented.
January 29, 2012, 09:47:38 PM
Here take a look at this..
I thought I'd help you out, I put a little blue mark at the start of a new round. New round starts, 3-400Ghash of pool hoppers jump on the 180Ghash pool.
1022 29 Jan 17:10:46 49m 14s
1021 29 Jan 16:21:32 7h 16m
1020 29 Jan 09:05:05 1 h 13m
1019 29 Jan 07:51:25 8m 43s
1018 29 Jan 07:42:42 1 h 40m
1017 29 Jan 06:02:24 8h 32m
1016 28 Jan 21:30:14 4h 19m
1015 28 Jan 17:11:03 11m 40s
Why the pool hasn't changed payment systems, after six months of knowing this is a problem, is beyond me. I was mining here on block #6, but I have no interest in mining while there is a 20% "hopper fee" in lower rewards.
Jump to: