Pages:
Author

Topic: Drake became partners of the Stake Casino (Read 1819 times)

legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1292
Hhampuz for Campaign management
April 29, 2022, 08:02:07 AM
It seems that cryptocurrency casinos are already entering a completely different level. Not only are they no longer anonymous, but they are also starting to play with data harvesting. I realize the prize is very high, but in my opinion the chances of winning it are too small to give them phone number. In my opinion, this is already too much.
In case you forget, there are still casinos that don't require you to do a KYC so don't say that all casinos are no longer anonymous.

They are entering a different level, that's true because some casinos are adding new features like they integrate NFT and metaverse on their platform but not because of that one above (the contest) that's a common thing already along with promotions but for that one above, I don't think it was legit and in fact someone already discussed it before, they also don't believe that it came from drake so be careful inputting your details there. It could be a scammer that wants to steal your details and then they will sell it for profits.

Yes it is quite normal nowadays to see that casinos are trying to upgrade from these new trend as they're also trying to catch up with time so that people will choose them over other brands/casinos.

We should still be careful on every casino's we enter because we might be the lucky one to be scammed as any of these casino's usually requires some information, so we can't really tell for sure if it is legit or not. Nonetheless, it's still best to visit casinos that are already known just to be safe.
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 722
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Drake was certainly the perfect fit for stake casino and has been an active fan of it so definitely, their partnership will create a good exposure on the part of stake that will open doors for more players and users that will bring high advantage for stake. The two will end up having good collaboration that will bring new experiences on the platform's users.
Yeah, that's a good partnership for both of them. A celebrity and player of their casino is an ideal partnership that they've built up. The model on this partnership is that other casinos will have the idea to look upon those celebs that are really into their casino and actually plays.
Or, understands the platform itself so that there's product knowledge for his followers to catch up what he's up to.
Well, the truth is yes, there is no denying it, but the movements that have been made in stake.com knowing how to choose the best influencers, although not influencers but people who actually represent and move the masses, not only to give a good vision to stake.com , but Drake represents that it moves fibers in many people, the mere fact that he is a person who is in the middle of casinos and bets, makes many who did not believe in BTC believe in the economy, this not only helps the industry of games, I think things go much further, touching on adoption and the fact that stake.com is one of the platforms that are gallant in the adoption of BTC is a very great privilege that it brings to the world.

No matter what form or method or ways on which exposure had been  done or been showed off as long it do share up on the same motive or intent in terms of adoption and exposure then its always been a good thing

Between partnerships with these celebs or influencers with crypto companies and casinos it do really shows off mutual benefits to each other plus of course it do really add up in overall adoption.
Some been saying that they had make it him as a partner just because he was a whale gambler on the site but we know that personal decisions couldnt be something that we do have right
to oppose.
legendary
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1883
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Drake was certainly the perfect fit for stake casino and has been an active fan of it so definitely, their partnership will create a good exposure on the part of stake that will open doors for more players and users that will bring high advantage for stake. The two will end up having good collaboration that will bring new experiences on the platform's users.
Yeah, that's a good partnership for both of them. A celebrity and player of their casino is an ideal partnership that they've built up. The model on this partnership is that other casinos will have the idea to look upon those celebs that are really into their casino and actually plays.
Or, understands the platform itself so that there's product knowledge for his followers to catch up what he's up to.
Well, the truth is yes, there is no denying it, but the movements that have been made in stake.com knowing how to choose the best influencers, although not influencers but people who actually represent and move the masses, not only to give a good vision to stake.com , but Drake represents that it moves fibers in many people, the mere fact that he is a person who is in the middle of casinos and bets, makes many who did not believe in BTC believe in the economy, this not only helps the industry of games, I think things go much further, touching on adoption and the fact that stake.com is one of the platforms that are gallant in the adoption of BTC is a very great privilege that it brings to the world.
hero member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 611
It seems that cryptocurrency casinos are already entering a completely different level. Not only are they no longer anonymous, but they are also starting to play with data harvesting. I realize the prize is very high, but in my opinion the chances of winning it are too small to give them phone number. In my opinion, this is already too much.
In case you forget, there are still casinos that don't require you to do a KYC so don't say that all casinos are no longer anonymous.

They are entering a different level, that's true because some casinos are adding new features like they integrate NFT and metaverse on their platform but not because of that one above (the contest) that's a common thing already along with promotions but for that one above, I don't think it was legit and in fact someone already discussed it before, they also don't believe that it came from drake so be careful inputting your details there. It could be a scammer that wants to steal your details and then they will sell it for profits.
hero member
Activity: 3150
Merit: 636
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.
Yeah.

If they're making more than Drake and benefiting from this partnership, they did a good job on their end and they're able to maximize their investment through him.

They're not new to this so they know what's the drill and how to make it known in the market to get more gamblers inside their platform.
I still can't believe how bad website performance that sponsors Drake, UfC. This partnership will be win-with for both parties and new user flow is main goal of Stake marketing team. Let's see what will happen after first stream since Drake stream has been delayed for 5 weeks. He keep placing million dollars worth roulette bets on live roulette tables and keep promoting website on Instagram stories. The upcoming streams will cause more traffic on platform but I doubt Stake will be to handle that much server loading since today was big fiasco during weekly raffle.
Well, he's an icon and celebrity.

That's going to be an assurance that there will be a lot of his fans registering on stake after seeing those stories that he makes and after posting it on his socials.

Maybe, they're already preparing for the possible flood of those new users on their platform soon.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1292
Hhampuz for Campaign management
Well I believe getting too much information is bad for one's privacy, I mean would they also want that their private information will be revealed publicly? I don't wonder why they even have a national envy day or even call it that way. That's just too absurd! Breaching one's privacy is already considered illegal and I'm curious what's the root or cause why they started to make that laws.

I doubt that the US Senators would agree on that law, it would never be passed because US citizens really cares their own privacy.

You are very optimistic. Remember how literally 20-30 years ago there was such a thing as a "secret bank deposit" when your relationship with the bank was kept secret and did not concern anyone. What is with this concept now? It just doesn't exist. The same will happen with other areas of life that are now private - officials will only say that this is done for your benefit and against terrorists and will take away your privacy.

It was kept secret because that is a confidential information and actually there's a law where it states neither anyone should know any deposits by one's person on his/her bank accounts or investments and even the concerned agencies or departments are prohibited to take a peak such accounts. If someone is suspicious and having some illegal activities then someone should file a concern first before you can look into that person's accounts.

I think this law still passes throughout the next generation. Correct me if I'm wrong on this one.
hero member
Activity: 2716
Merit: 904

If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.

Seriously? That is something already private and I think it's already violating our privacy. Even an employee of tax agencies can't easily access any information without permission. I'm not aware that it's possible in Norway or Finland etc.

Regardless, I don't understand what's the big deal on that part related to Drake's partnership with Stake.

I know it doesn't really matter to know what's behind the cooperation between Drake and Stake but I don't see why should be curious about that.

Sadly there can be those times like that especially when people got so curious about your personal information or even your tax declaration, actually I'm seeing that they are just envy that's why they would take such steps to answer their curiosity when infact they already knew that it is illegal to invade someone's privacy especially for sensitive information like that.
Your personal information/data are mostly visited when you become a public figure or you contesting an election your opponents may try to look for data to use against you as a political attack and if you are found wanting in your tax returns that information can be used to disqualify you from an election that is what is happening in my region so the government makes it compulsory for public office holders and political leaders to declare their asset. and make their task information public and published on the revenue office website, but this does not apply to all the citizens but only to government officeholders.
Yes, but that is not what we are discussing here because it is already expected that those people who chose to run for public seat should declare every penny in their bank and their asset, others call it Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) .. What we are discussing is that it is normal for other country to find your private information even if you are just a regular citizen and that it's just a one phone call away, by the way that's legal for them as well.
sr. member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 339
If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.
Seriously? That is something already private and I think it's already violating our privacy. Even an employee of tax agencies can't easily access any information without permission. I'm not aware that it's possible in Norway or Finland etc.

Regardless, I don't understand what's the big deal on that part related to Drake's partnership with Stake.

I know it doesn't really matter to know what's behind the cooperation between Drake and Stake but I don't see why should be curious about that.
Yes it is private on most countries but not on those countries he listed. I think people there doesn't really care about their privacy or we can say that it was not a strict country because they allow such things. The partnership between stake and drake is not really a big deal to us but there are still people that is not contented on what they see but they need to dig for more information.

In our place, so many people are like this, they don't focus on their selves if what is wrong with them but they focus too much on other people. They badly want to get updates if what's going on with other people's lives. Stake already confirmed that drake is with them, that should already end there.
sr. member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 260
Who else here submit some info here:
Code:
"To enter this chance to win, Email your phone number and username to [email protected]"

Any feedback about if there's someone here who actually got lucky to win here?

It seems that cryptocurrency casinos are already entering a completely different level. Not only are they no longer anonymous, but they are also starting to play with data harvesting. I realize the prize is very high, but in my opinion the chances of winning it are too small to give them phone number. In my opinion, this is already too much.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1008
Your personal information/data are mostly visited when you become a public figure or you contesting an election your opponents may try to look for data to use against you as a political attack and if you are found wanting in your tax returns that information can be used to disqualify you from an election that is what is happening in my region so the government makes it compulsory for public office holders and political leaders to declare their asset. and make their task information public and published on the revenue office website, but this does not apply to all the citizens but only to government officeholders.

I understand that but not to the extent that people have to know Drake's tax or whatever just because of this partnership with Stake. And besides, he is not an election candidate that's why I can't apply that statement of yours here.

Anyways, let's stick with the Drake X Stake program.

Who else here submit some info here:
Code:
"To enter this chance to win, Email your phone number and username to [email protected]"

Any feedback about if there's someone here who actually got lucky to win here?
hero member
Activity: 3066
Merit: 629
20BET - Premium Casino & Sportsbook
In the win-win statement, it is not that someone will win more and someone else will win less, but that no one is losing out on it. At least not Stake.com or Drake.
However, I think that with such a large marketing expense, Stake.com may try to raise its house edge to cover the costs. So if someone loses out on it, it's probably players.
Well as said by the others, two of them are winning on this. The expense for things like this is well budgeted by them. They have it cover and if there's a change to their house, we'll know about it.
In marketing or having a deal with a celebrity, there's always the cost ready and they've got a huge budget on this so if you're thinking about it. They don't even discuss it in the public.
hero member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 765
Top Crypto Casino

If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.

Seriously? That is something already private and I think it's already violating our privacy. Even an employee of tax agencies can't easily access any information without permission. I'm not aware that it's possible in Norway or Finland etc.

Regardless, I don't understand what's the big deal on that part related to Drake's partnership with Stake.

I know it doesn't really matter to know what's behind the cooperation between Drake and Stake but I don't see why should be curious about that.

Sadly there can be those times like that especially when people got so curious about your personal information or even your tax declaration, actually I'm seeing that they are just envy that's why they would take such steps to answer their curiosity when infact they already knew that it is illegal to invade someone's privacy especially for sensitive information like that.
Your personal information/data are mostly visited when you become a public figure or you contesting an election your opponents may try to look for data to use against you as a political attack and if you are found wanting in your tax returns that information can be used to disqualify you from an election that is what is happening in my region so the government makes it compulsory for public office holders and political leaders to declare their asset. and make their task information public and published on the revenue office website, but this does not apply to all the citizens but only to government officeholders.
hero member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 505
Agree. It's definitely a win-win situation for both Stake and Drake. And you got a point as well regarding Stake having the greater benefit in this partnership because like what you said, Drake is promoting them based on their contract. Certainly, Drake having many followers because he has a wide reach will garner many potential gamblers to play on Stake.com. At the same time, Drake is known to be a 'passionate' gambler, while he is promoting Stake, he will definitely play in it using his own money. After all, that's what he's known for - betting and risking big amounts.

So it's really a win on the side of Stake. Although I'm sure Drake would also enjoy some perks of being collaborated with them.
Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.

In the win-win statement, it is not that someone will win more and someone else will win less, but that no one is losing out on it. At least not Stake.com or Drake.
However, I think that with such a large marketing expense, Stake.com may try to raise its house edge to cover the costs. So if someone loses out on it, it's probably players.
hero member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 518
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.
Yeah.

If they're making more than Drake and benefiting from this partnership, they did a good job on their end and they're able to maximize their investment through him.

They're not new to this so they know what's the drill and how to make it known in the market to get more gamblers inside their platform.
I still can't believe how bad website performance that sponsors Drake, UfC. This partnership will be win-with for both parties and new user flow is main goal of Stake marketing team. Let's see what will happen after first stream since Drake stream has been delayed for 5 weeks. He keep placing million dollars worth roulette bets on live roulette tables and keep promoting website on Instagram stories. The upcoming streams will cause more traffic on platform but I doubt Stake will be to handle that much server loading since today was big fiasco during weekly raffle.
They had chosen and accepts Drake as one of their partner for they know that this could help them in the long run. I'm not going to question their market sharing as in the first place, they already agreed on it before the partnership starts. I don't like to draw a conclusion that fast as there is certainly a time for both parties to develop. But as of now, it was very clear that both of them are benefiting from this and believe that their partnership really works.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.
Yeah.

If they're making more than Drake and benefiting from this partnership, they did a good job on their end and they're able to maximize their investment through him.

They're not new to this so they know what's the drill and how to make it known in the market to get more gamblers inside their platform.
I still can't believe how bad website performance that sponsors Drake, UfC. This partnership will be win-with for both parties and new user flow is main goal of Stake marketing team. Let's see what will happen after first stream since Drake stream has been delayed for 5 weeks. He keep placing million dollars worth roulette bets on live roulette tables and keep promoting website on Instagram stories. The upcoming streams will cause more traffic on platform but I doubt Stake will be to handle that much server loading since today was big fiasco during weekly raffle.
hero member
Activity: 3150
Merit: 636
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.
Yeah.

If they're making more than Drake and benefiting from this partnership, they did a good job on their end and they're able to maximize their investment through him.

They're not new to this so they know what's the drill and how to make it known in the market to get more gamblers inside their platform.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1978
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Well I believe getting too much information is bad for one's privacy, I mean would they also want that their private information will be revealed publicly? I don't wonder why they even have a national envy day or even call it that way. That's just too absurd! Breaching one's privacy is already considered illegal and I'm curious what's the root or cause why they started to make that laws.

I doubt that the US Senators would agree on that law, it would never be passed because US citizens really cares their own privacy.

You are very optimistic. Remember how literally 20-30 years ago there was such a thing as a "secret bank deposit" when your relationship with the bank was kept secret and did not concern anyone. What is with this concept now? It just doesn't exist. The same will happen with other areas of life that are now private - officials will only say that this is done for your benefit and against terrorists and will take away your privacy.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1292
Hhampuz for Campaign management
I found this information, as I understand it is common in the Scandinavian countries:

Quote
Privacy, what privacy? Many Nordic tax records are a phone call away

When top earners’ tax returns are published in Finland, they call it “national envy day”. In Sweden, one phone call will get you your lawmaker’s tax bill. Norwegians’ fascination with each others’ taxes has been labeled “financial porn”.

While the Panama Papers have forced British politicians to reveal tax details that are traditionally kept private, and U.S. presidential candidates are under pressure to do likewise, most Nordic citizens’ tax returns are freely available.

Every November, Finnish media publish the names of about 10,000 of the country’s biggest earners, plus hundreds of celebrities and sports stars, making headlines with top 10 lists of the biggest tax payers.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-panama-tax-nordics-idUSKCN0X91QE

Yes, I also think that this is too personal information, but as I mentioned in some countries this information is considered to be of public importance, so it becomes available to everyone.
Regarding Drake, this is interesting because he is a tier 1 celebrity and everyone (or many people) would be interested in how much he is paid for any promotion.

Well I believe getting too much information is bad for one's privacy, I mean would they also want that their private information will be revealed publicly? I don't wonder why they even have a national envy day or even call it that way. That's just too absurd! Breaching one's privacy is already considered illegal and I'm curious what's the root or cause why they started to make that laws.

I doubt that the US Senators would agree on that law, it would never be passed because US citizens really cares their own privacy.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1978
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
If I remember correctly, in Norway (or Finland) any citizen can go to the website of the tax office and study the tax return of any other citizen (but not anonymously - you will find out who looked at your declaration). Such information is evaluated differently everywhere - somewhere as private, and somewhere as socially significant, that is, it is made public.
The very details of the cooperation between the casino and Drake do not really matter, but human curiosity is pushing to find out.

Seriously? That is something already private and I think it's already violating our privacy. Even an employee of tax agencies can't easily access any information without permission. I'm not aware that it's possible in Norway or Finland etc.

Regardless, I don't understand what's the big deal on that part related to Drake's partnership with Stake.

I know it doesn't really matter to know what's behind the cooperation between Drake and Stake but I don't see why should be curious about that.

I found this information, as I understand it is common in the Scandinavian countries:

Quote
Privacy, what privacy? Many Nordic tax records are a phone call away

When top earners’ tax returns are published in Finland, they call it “national envy day”. In Sweden, one phone call will get you your lawmaker’s tax bill. Norwegians’ fascination with each others’ taxes has been labeled “financial porn”.

While the Panama Papers have forced British politicians to reveal tax details that are traditionally kept private, and U.S. presidential candidates are under pressure to do likewise, most Nordic citizens’ tax returns are freely available.

Every November, Finnish media publish the names of about 10,000 of the country’s biggest earners, plus hundreds of celebrities and sports stars, making headlines with top 10 lists of the biggest tax payers.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-panama-tax-nordics-idUSKCN0X91QE

Yes, I also think that this is too personal information, but as I mentioned in some countries this information is considered to be of public importance, so it becomes available to everyone.
Regarding Drake, this is interesting because he is a tier 1 celebrity and everyone (or many people) would be interested in how much he is paid for any promotion.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1383
Agree. It's definitely a win-win situation for both Stake and Drake. And you got a point as well regarding Stake having the greater benefit in this partnership because like what you said, Drake is promoting them based on their contract. Certainly, Drake having many followers because he has a wide reach will garner many potential gamblers to play on Stake.com. At the same time, Drake is known to be a 'passionate' gambler, while he is promoting Stake, he will definitely play in it using his own money. After all, that's what he's known for - betting and risking big amounts.

So it's really a win on the side of Stake. Although I'm sure Drake would also enjoy some perks of being collaborated with them.
Since both parties are winning with this arrangement I think it is best to not look at things in that way, after all it is almost impossible to arrange things in such a way that both parties will benefit in the same exact proportion than the other, there will always be a party that wins more, and even if we were to agree with the assumption that stake is benefiting more than drake with this arrangement then we should applaud stake by being able to get such a good deal for themselves while benefiting drake in the process as well.
Pages:
Jump to: