Drake hadnt been forced to play on Stake until he was discovered that he's behind on a certain account which do spends big time on the platform which it would really be understandable
that Stake would grab out the opportunity on making him as a partner considering his fan base then that would really be giving out some good exposure on the site even more.
Aside on getting some good revenue or income from Drake they are also benefiting out when it comes to marketing specially now that they do have made out some partnership.
With the success the Drake and Stake partnership that we are witnessing I would not be surprised that at the near future some other casinos try to do something similar, after all we know that “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery”, so if other casinos want to obtain a similar success for them as well then it makes sense they try to obtain the support from celebrities to support their brand and make them reach a population that was not accessible for them before.
Expect about it because that would surely happen in the near future and it's kind of normal nowadays to see some other brands trying to imitate what the other brand did which was really a success like the Stake did when they got Drake to endorse for them. But the challenge for them is to have the right man or woman for the job who's also a big gambler that the public knows and of course got a huge fan base to make the brand more expose.
I think it isn't the first time a casino did this kind of marketing, we've seen this in the past and we will see such scenarios in the future as well. The thing is, it shouldn't just the exposure or that people knows it, they should have been the voice of the community as well, so in order to do that I think regular live stream playing on what casino they promotes is needed. It needs more execution rather than just pure display.
Yes, it isn't and time after time things like this will always bound to happen as these casino's are competing to increase their popularity and clients. For Drake's case, he don't need to do some livestreams just to promote the Stake as he is already known enough to the public through his chosen industry which is music and he's also a big gambler that everyone on the internet are already much aware of.
Its not his line of career but having some streams as a side habit or something like that then its really his choice but actually its true that he wont really be needing if he does really intend to expose or give out some plugs
on certain sites or services that he might involved into and having that huge fan base then it would really be just easily to be shown and make people aware about on things that you are involved.
Any business would really love to make use of this advantage but of course it would come by a price.
Exactly, I cannot just really imagine that Drake would do some regular livestreams to promote the Stake and I highly doubt that it's included on the agreement. Maybe there will be some times that Drake would mention Stake if ever he goes live in the mainstream media even if he don't have to do it.
If the Stake management want someone to expose them regularly in the livestreams then they should hire another one that suits for that specific field.
They are right, really the success of Stake.com is not only because they have Drake, it is known that Drake is an influencer by nature, and nothing else with the number of followers he has just by saying stake.com and his fans will seek to enter the platform, to bet, to know, is not a bad strategy, in fact it is one of the master moves that the casino has.
It is a fact that the other casino platforms see what Stake.com does, at some point they will too, and that is correct, it is like that healthy competition that must exist, more so in this crowded field and that every day there are more platforms resurfacing and they are looking for ways to be more viewed than others, for now we have to enjoy what stake.com is offering us.
