Man you dont know what is the attitude of the person in this world some person want to destroy him for their own interest. As you can see in the situation the president is a victim of this kind of person in both US and China. US to probed against human rights violation but US is the one who massacred middle east double standard. And china which occupies the west philippine sea. So who is the victim after all its philippines. Am i right? People hide from the curtain to destroy man's reputation to get that they are the who is stronger but they are the one who is weak. They use money to manipulate others. This person is fair. He is never been a corrupt person look what his done in his city. Do not want to others what you do not want unto you. Thats all. Then who is the VICTIM?
That's right, pretend Duterte is the VICTIM here.
Oh wait, Duterte is a bully and a thug who has victimized 1000s of people including many homeless kids.
He is corrupt because he breaks the laws that he took an Oath of Office to uphold and defend.
The VICTIMS here are the most vulnerable people in the world, the street children who are being demonized as "drug addicts" and hunted down to be slaughtered like animals.
I'm sure it's all some kind of giant conspiracy to get poor little Duterte.
I'm sure Obama forced Duterte to unleash vigilantes on the poorest, most wretched and defenseless people on the planet.
It's not like Duterte fits the definition of "demagogue" to a tee.
A demagogue or rabble-rouser is a leader in a democracy who gains popularity by exploiting prejudice and ignorance among the common people, whipping up the passions of the crowd and shutting down reasoned deliberation. Demagogues have usually advocated immediate, violent action to address a national crisis while accusing moderate and thoughtful opponents of weakness or disloyalty. Demagogues violate established rules of political conduct; most who were elected to high office changed their democracy into some form of dictatorship.
Did Duterte "gain popularity by exploiting prejudice and ignorance among the common people, whipping up the passions of the crowd and shutting down reasoned deliberation?"
YES HE DID.
Did Duterte "advocate immediate, violent action to address a national crisis while accusing moderate and thoughtful opponents of weakness or disloyalty?"
OH FUCK YES HE DID.
Did Duterte "violate established rules of political conduct?"
Again, check and double check.
That's very conclusive evidence Duterte fits the definition of a demagogue.
You only defend him because of your prejudice and ignorance. When he turns full dictator and it all goes totally Venezuela, good luck with that and don't say nobody warned you.