They were on my trust lists for a long time and I was not aware of any of this so I removed them. Funny how you and Pharmie are aching for more conflict.
I can assure you the last thing I am looking for is conflict. Thank you for addressing the situation. 
Topic: DT everyone? @TECSHARE - page 3. (Read 1142 times)
Speaking of that, interesting timing to exclude me isn't it The Pharmacist?
It might be funny to you, but it was overdue. I think you have lousy judgement when it comes to matters of the trust system, which is why you were booted off DT the first time you were on it. 
Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.
I just excluded them both, that's why.If you want to present a compelling argument as to why we should be keeping known scammers on DT, I'd be happy to revise my ratings. Perhaps you could also explain why you are including two inactive accounts whose only feedback left is a positive to yourself:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/daddywarbucks-179952
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/c1010010-92735
Sure about that? They were on my trust lists for a long time and I was not aware of any of this so I removed them. Funny how you and Pharmie are aching for more conflict.
Speaking of that, interesting timing to exclude me isn't it The Pharmacist? I guess you just didn't find me untrustworthy until I was back on DT1. Amazing coincidence. I guess that is what I get for removing you from my exclusions.
Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.
Doesn't seem like they should be, and if you disagree I'd say your judgement is skewed by your rage against the current DT list. To me, Leo did the responsible thing. Cryptohunter is again blowing smoke, and the only thing he's going to drain is the precious time of anyone who bothers to read his moronic tirades.
Haha which you just did you dumb fool. You have to be the most stupid person on this board. I bet you don't have me on ignore and read all of my posts but prefer to hide away.
Okay since we are issuing challenges here ...why don't you and leo both give detailed explanations why.
1. you include proven liars
2. you include proven trust abusers
3. you include proven sneaky and greedy financially motivated racist trolling shit posters who hide behind puppet accounts
obviously 3 is for leo only hehe (or are you including yourself from Huge Black Womans account? )
I mean that is just for a start, let me get to the "how did you come to know for sure that the extortion attempt was just under cover agents at work?" let's work through that again in public to see how you are so sure it was not a real extortion attempt?
Let me know if you are willing to engage in debate over this or not. I am hoping that you will be open to this debate because I have been wanting to have it in public for quite some time now.
This is a topic about the validity of DT members so this post is on topic and fully relevant.
I'm going to guess I don't hear back from these couple of low functioning dirt bags. No debate
DT is slowly filling with scammers, hacked accounts, inactive users...
Sooner or later everyone will become DT.
2 examples:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/erwin45hacked-398379
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/xetsr-101763
What's the point of such system?
Sooner or later everyone will become DT.
2 examples:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/erwin45hacked-398379
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/xetsr-101763
What's the point of such system?
How about current DT members who aren't even a single year on that board but try to tell you how the forum runs.
Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.
Doesn't seem like they should be, and if you disagree I'd say your judgement is skewed by your rage against the current DT list. To me, Leo did the responsible thing. Cryptohunter is again blowing smoke, and the only thing he's going to drain is the precious time of anyone who bothers to read his moronic tirades.
Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.
I just excluded them both, that's why.If you want to present a compelling argument as to why we should be keeping known scammers on DT, I'd be happy to revise my ratings. Perhaps you could also explain why you are including two inactive accounts whose only feedback left is a positive to yourself:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/daddywarbucks-179952
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/c1010010-92735
Huh. Look at that they aren't on DT2 any more. Amazing how that works.
It has been full of proven liars, proven trust abusers and proven sneaky greedy sig spamming sock puppet racist trolls and those implicated in extortion and other shady stuff for ages. Not to mention the rest of DT condone and sanction their actions. Those 2 you highlight are likely snow white in comparison.
Don't worry about it, I'm taking care of it. Just taking some time... I'm on vacation. The swamp will be drained eventually.
Want evidence to substantiate my post just ask me to provide.
Don't worry about it, I'm taking care of it. Just taking some time... I'm on vacation. The swamp will be drained eventually.
Want evidence to substantiate my post just ask me to provide.
DT is slowly filling with scammers, hacked accounts, inactive users...
Sooner or later everyone will become DT.
2 examples:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/erwin45hacked-398379
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/xetsr-101763
What's the point of such system?
I forget to update topic with more accounts: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52406482, so doing it now.
Sooner or later everyone will become DT.
2 examples:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/erwin45hacked-398379
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/xetsr-101763
What's the point of such system?
I forget to update topic with more accounts: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52406482, so doing it now.
Jump to: