DT everyone? @TECSHARE | Bitcointalksearch.org

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Quote from: El duderino_ on September 12, 2019, 05:53:42 AM

its difficult to only get the top members on DT1 and thats a good thing....(not that spammers and scammers and etc are needed) but to have many very trusted members on DT isn't bad imo, I believe those that are very trust worthy and are honest with other people are doing a good job for online places like this ...

Spoken like TRUE MORON and ASS FELTCHER.

Only someone with your level of stupidity could try deny that DT1 is stacked full of untrustworthy scoundrels, scammers and their supporters. People as low functioning as you who can say this in the light of the facts produced in this thread should be stripped of all merits and frozen at a rank named full retard.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/poll-the-official-dirty-turds-poll-which-dt-needs-flushing-first-5170789

Yeah brilliant example of how scammers cycling merit to their supporters results in a mass of untrustworthy and weak scum in DT1

El duderino_

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 13334

BTC + Crossfit, living life.

its difficult to only get the top members on DT1 and thats a good thing....(not that spammers and scammers and etc are needed) but to have many very trusted members on DT isn't bad imo, I believe those that are very trust worthy and are honest with other people are doing a good job for online places like this ...

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 11, 2019, 05:41:10 PM

Quote from: marlboroza on September 11, 2019, 05:35:20 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 11, 2019, 05:26:56 PM

Quote from: marlboroza on September 11, 2019, 05:19:03 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 11, 2019, 04:31:15 PM

If the account is banned, what is the problem? How is a banned account going to effect the trust system? Did they leave a bunch of false ratings or is this just a pathetic stretch for you to give the impression of impropriety?

NOTE TO MODERATORS: This thread is now clearly directed at me individually, please move it to the appropriate subforum of REPUTATION as per my report where it belongs. Thank you.

No, it is not. You are missing my point here. As I said, you see everything as personal attack.

What is point of DT system if hacked accounts are "allowed" to end up in DT?

I am not missing anything. If the account was not used to abuse the trust system, and it is now banned and unable to be used, exactly what is the harm to the trust system? Of course there is no risk

What is the harm of having hacked account in default trust system? Good question. But as you have already answered it, there is no point into continuing this discussion with you.

If you don't like the answer, just pretend I said something else.

Why would I pretend that you said something else? You said "of course there is no risk".

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:05:02 PM

Oh right, I forgot I am supposed to uphold a higher standard than practically everyone else on your own trust list. I forgot, its rules for me and not for thee.

I have to admit, you got me here.

Who is in my own trust list again?

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Quote from: marlboroza on September 11, 2019, 05:19:03 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 11, 2019, 04:31:15 PM

If the account is banned, what is the problem? How is a banned account going to effect the trust system? Did they leave a bunch of false ratings or is this just a pathetic stretch for you to give the impression of impropriety?

NOTE TO MODERATORS: This thread is now clearly directed at me individually, please move it to the appropriate subforum of REPUTATION as per my report where it belongs. Thank you.

No, it is not. You are missing my point here. As I said, you see everything as personal attack.

What is point of DT system if hacked accounts are "allowed" to end up in DT?

Well obviously it was directed at him because you put @tecshare in the thread title and then just removed it now from the title as you can see, since it was still above your post before he asked it moved to rep.

This is the kind of sneaky behavior we are getting familiar with from DT and their pals.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: marlboroza on September 11, 2019, 05:35:20 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 11, 2019, 05:26:56 PM

Quote from: marlboroza on September 11, 2019, 05:19:03 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 11, 2019, 04:31:15 PM

If the account is banned, what is the problem? How is a banned account going to effect the trust system? Did they leave a bunch of false ratings or is this just a pathetic stretch for you to give the impression of impropriety?

NOTE TO MODERATORS: This thread is now clearly directed at me individually, please move it to the appropriate subforum of REPUTATION as per my report where it belongs. Thank you.

No, it is not. You are missing my point here. As I said, you see everything as personal attack.

What is point of DT system if hacked accounts are "allowed" to end up in DT?

I am not missing anything. If the account was not used to abuse the trust system, and it is now banned and unable to be used, exactly what is the harm to the trust system? Of course there is no risk

What is the harm of having hacked account in default trust system? Good question. But as you have already answered it, there is no point into continuing this discussion with you.

If you don't like the answer, just pretend I said something else.

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 11, 2019, 05:26:56 PM

Quote from: marlboroza on September 11, 2019, 05:19:03 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 11, 2019, 04:31:15 PM

If the account is banned, what is the problem? How is a banned account going to effect the trust system? Did they leave a bunch of false ratings or is this just a pathetic stretch for you to give the impression of impropriety?

NOTE TO MODERATORS: This thread is now clearly directed at me individually, please move it to the appropriate subforum of REPUTATION as per my report where it belongs. Thank you.

No, it is not. You are missing my point here. As I said, you see everything as personal attack.

What is point of DT system if hacked accounts are "allowed" to end up in DT?

I am not missing anything. If the account was not used to abuse the trust system, and it is now banned and unable to be used, exactly what is the harm to the trust system? Of course there is no risk

What is the harm of having hacked account in default trust system? Good question. But as you have already answered it, there is no point into continuing this discussion with you.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: marlboroza on September 11, 2019, 05:19:03 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 11, 2019, 04:31:15 PM

If the account is banned, what is the problem? How is a banned account going to effect the trust system? Did they leave a bunch of false ratings or is this just a pathetic stretch for you to give the impression of impropriety?

NOTE TO MODERATORS: This thread is now clearly directed at me individually, please move it to the appropriate subforum of REPUTATION as per my report where it belongs. Thank you.

No, it is not. You are missing my point here. As I said, you see everything as personal attack.

What is point of DT system if hacked accounts are "allowed" to end up in DT?

I am not missing anything. If the account was not used to abuse the trust system, and it is now banned and unable to be used, exactly what is the harm to the trust system? Of course there is no risk, this is just another one of your increasingly thin excuses to mount this personal attack and attempt to force me to comply to your demands via mob "justice".

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 11, 2019, 04:31:15 PM

If the account is banned, what is the problem? How is a banned account going to effect the trust system? Did they leave a bunch of false ratings or is this just a pathetic stretch for you to give the impression of impropriety?

NOTE TO MODERATORS: This thread is now clearly directed at me individually, please move it to the appropriate subforum of REPUTATION as per my report where it belongs. Thank you.

No, it is not. You are missing my point here. As I said, you see everything as personal attack.

What is point of DT system if hacked accounts are "allowed" to end up in DT?

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: marlboroza on September 11, 2019, 03:37:53 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 10, 2019, 10:41:45 AM

And? If I remember right he is some one I traded with a long time ago. I don't like using countering trust ratings. What exactly is your issue other than your obsession with digging through my shit looking for peanuts?

I can't find feedback for trade and you left lots trade-feedbacks in 2013/2014. So banned and possible hacked account will one day maybe become default trust member because you think that you have traded with them long time ago?

Is it original owner who you traded with still owner of account or not? You probably know this because you trust them because you maybe remember that you traded with them?

If the account is banned, what is the problem? How is a banned account going to effect the trust system? Did they leave a bunch of false ratings or is this just a pathetic stretch for you to give the impression of impropriety?

NOTE TO MODERATORS: This thread is now clearly directed at me individually, please move it to the appropriate subforum of REPUTATION as per my report where it belongs. Thank you.

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 10, 2019, 10:41:45 AM

And? If I remember right he is some one I traded with a long time ago. I don't like using countering trust ratings. What exactly is your issue other than your obsession with digging through my shit looking for peanuts?

I can't find feedback for trade and you left lots trade-feedbacks in 2013/2014. So banned and possible hacked account will one day maybe become default trust member because you think that you have traded with them long time ago?

Is it original owner who you traded with still owner of account or not? You probably know this because you trust them because you maybe remember that you traded with them?

xolxol

member

Activity: 241

Merit: 98

Quote from: marlboroza on September 09, 2019, 10:36:56 AM

DT should hold some responsibility.

Thats ironic coming from abuser like you,get lost like Lauda you're too scared because the gang is losing control in this forum.

unibitcoinist

member

Activity: 121

Merit: 40

Quote from: marlboroza on September 09, 2019, 10:36:56 AM

DT should hold some responsibility.

You are very correct.
That's why this, this users are into DT.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: marlboroza on September 10, 2019, 08:53:45 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:54:18 PM

Users can be banned for breaking forum rules but still have valid trust

Lets see, banned user:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=79546
Nothing since 2014. in trust. Of course, most trust is without reference.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:54:18 PM

Just because you manufacture suspicion about a user doesn't make him "obviously hacked".

So why don't you counter negative feedback then? Or you don't trust user which you have in your trust list?

And? If I remember right he is some one I traded with a long time ago. I don't like using countering trust ratings. What exactly is your issue other than your obsession with digging through my shit looking for peanuts?

The-One-Above-All

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 56

Quote from: marlboroza on September 10, 2019, 08:53:45 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:54:18 PM

Users can be banned for breaking forum rules but still have valid trust

Lets see, banned user:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=79546
Nothing since 2014. in trust. Of course, most trust is without reference.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:54:18 PM

Just because you manufacture suspicion about a user doesn't make him "obviously hacked".

So why don't you counter negative feedback then? Or you don't trust user which you have in your trust list?

The fair and sensible solution is if ALL DT1 members agree to have to publicly state yes or no to whether each member on their trust list has financially motivated wrong doing in their past. Since this is the primary concern of default trust - to protect people financially. Not to shelter them from other peoples opinions on the strength and fighting capability of homosexuals. Or any other non direct examples of clear financially motivated wrong doing.

If you are demanding he publicly explain yes or no in relation to his trust list includes. THEN YOU ALL SHOULD ALSO.

DO YOU AGREE TO DO SO? YES OR NO

Or he has to explain publicly but you do not?

Bring a big comparison thread so we the readers can see if his includes list looks more financially high risk to the board or whether REALLY his list looks to clearly be less RISKY and provide more protection than the rest of DT1.

These double standards that OTHERS must explain their actions but WE refuse to explain our own actions must be stamped out.

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:54:18 PM

Users can be banned for breaking forum rules but still have valid trust

Lets see, banned user:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=79546
Nothing since 2014. in trust. Of course, most trust is without reference.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:54:18 PM

Just because you manufacture suspicion about a user doesn't make him "obviously hacked".

So why don't you counter negative feedback then? Or you don't trust user which you have in your trust list?

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: marlboroza on September 09, 2019, 06:37:20 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:17:46 PM

I also like the part where you demand I answer accusations about unnamed people over and over again. You are literally demanding I hold accountability for people you refuse to even name. Now why would I interpret that as personally targeting behavior?

Here you go:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52406482 etc

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt-everyone-tecshare-5118173

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nsfw-phisical-violence-in-dt-not-safe-for-work-content-5182672

Quote

Please address obviously hacked accounts/scammers/inactive accounts/banned users in your trust list.

Just because you manufacture suspicion about a user doesn't make him "obviously hacked". Users can be banned for breaking forum rules but still have valid trust, the same goes for inactive users. None of this explains why you never simply addressed me personally about these concerns instead of directly using it to formulate an attack on me personally.

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:17:46 PM

I also like the part where you demand I answer accusations about unnamed people over and over again. You are literally demanding I hold accountability for people you refuse to even name. Now why would I interpret that as personally targeting behavior?

Here you go:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52406482 etc

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt-everyone-tecshare-5118173

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nsfw-phisical-violence-in-dt-not-safe-for-work-content-5182672

Quote

Please address obviously hacked accounts/scammers/inactive accounts/banned users in your trust list.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: marlboroza on September 09, 2019, 06:13:42 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:05:02 PM

Quote from: marlboroza on September 09, 2019, 05:53:09 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 02:24:06 PM

If you really gave a fuck about who I included you would message me

Why would I do that https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52405611 ?

Trick me once...

Some one who was legitimately concerned about my inclusions would contact me.

Quote from: marlboroza on September 09, 2019, 05:53:09 PM

Why would I do that https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52405611 ?

Trick me once...

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:05:02 PM

If no one bothers to lodge a complaint with me, exactly how am I supposed to know anyone has a problem? Oh right, I forgot I am supposed to uphold a higher standard than practically everyone else on your own trust list. I forgot, its rules for me and not for thee.

Ok, so you asked question and you answered it, you don't need anyone's reply then.

Anyway:

Quote

Please address obviously hacked accounts/scammers/inactive accounts/banned users in your trust list.

Cute avoidance of making any reply. I also like the part where you demand I answer accusations about unnamed people over and over again. You are literally demanding I hold accountability for people you refuse to even name. Now why would I interpret that as personally targeting behavior?

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:05:02 PM

Quote from: marlboroza on September 09, 2019, 05:53:09 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 02:24:06 PM

If you really gave a fuck about who I included you would message me

Why would I do that https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52405611 ?

Trick me once...

Some one who was legitimately concerned about my inclusions would contact me.

Quote from: marlboroza on September 09, 2019, 05:53:09 PM

Why would I do that https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52405611 ?

Trick me once...

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 06:05:02 PM

If no one bothers to lodge a complaint with me, exactly how am I supposed to know anyone has a problem? Oh right, I forgot I am supposed to uphold a higher standard than practically everyone else on your own trust list. I forgot, its rules for me and not for thee.

Ok, so you asked question and you answered it, you don't need anyone's reply then.

Anyway:

Quote

Please address obviously hacked accounts/scammers/inactive accounts/banned users in your trust list.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 2008

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: marlboroza on September 09, 2019, 05:53:09 PM

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 02:24:06 PM

Please direct your obviously coordinated attack to reputation where it belongs.

Please address obviously hacked accounts/scammers/inactive accounts/banned users in your trust list.

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 02:24:06 PM

If you really gave a fuck about who I included you would message me

Why would I do that https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52405611 ?

Trick me once...

Quote from: TECSHARE on September 09, 2019, 02:24:06 PM

this is about targeting me personally, not who is on my trust list.

Oh, victim card.

Some one who was legitimately concerned about my inclusions would contact me. Some one who is hoping to craft an attack narrative would pitch a tent, invite all his clown friends, and set up a 3 ring circus. You refuse to even name the "obviously hacked/scammers/inactive/banned users".

I don't know if you have noticed, but I have been in this community for almost a decade. Things change in such a period of time. If no one bothers to lodge a complaint with me, exactly how am I supposed to know anyone has a problem? Oh right, I forgot I am supposed to uphold a higher standard than practically everyone else on your own trust list. I forgot, its rules for me and not for thee.

Topic: DT everyone? @TECSHARE (Read 1203 times)