Topic: DT members can now to be hold liable for their negative feedback (Read 516 times)

I'm not. I'm quite clearly stating a specific instance of a dangerous action that I consider untrustworthy, and that's why I think they deserve red, not just because I "don't like" it. Everything else is just voices in your head.

For example I don't like escrow scammers but my dislike is not the reason they deserve red trust. The scamming part is the reason. I know that's some next level shit for you but try to keep up.

This can be seen playing out live with the Craig Wright lawsuits. Dr Craig will never see one satoshi from those.

@QS do you not feel CH, Thule and the latest raft of loonies are skaming everyone of there time with the multiple shitty threads and posts?

You are implying someone should have a “bright red warning” if they do something you don’t like, which is implying they should have negative trust as you have a “bright red warning” when you receive negative trust. Receiving negative trust means that the person is calling you a scammer. Doing something you don’t like doesn’t make you a scammer and as such you are advocating for anyone who does something you don’t like to be slandered.

The only manipulator and liar here is you.
Who did i doxed ?

Just for you the meaning of doxed
Which information have i published ?
Asking for somebodies identity to make him accountable is not doxing if i don't publish his details publicly.

You always were and will be a manipulator.
Let's see how you will explain in court all your bs claims.

I didn't mention or imply slandering at all but you're a well-known liar so making such ludicrously false statements is par for the course I guess. And you believe that anyone who does something you don’t like deserves to be doxed so there is a great deal of projection in your statement as well, as usual.

Well here you said it yourself. No claim of scammed or tried to scam. Does not pass the threshold test for red trust. I do not feel that people who post things like this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/poetry-by-tman-5138619  and all the other "experts" there who cry if you are not polite to them and use their correct username you are a troll, and yet celebrate and raise money for a rap of TMANS sexual deviance "trolling" likely caused by abuse by his parents.

I'm not sure where those experts, burger flippers and double standards fools get to decide on who sounds more insane out of thule or tman.

Can you present some insane posts from thule here because they will likely turn out to be some kind of pissed off expression at getting as he perceives it trust abused and ridiculed.

"an obvious lie" you say? I do not agree. Someone that openly includes observable liars, scammers, probable extortionists and shady escrows on to DT are likely capable of not paying for some mining equipment.  So it looks to me as if it was the actions of an honest member asking if he should alert the entire community.

NOW suchmoon seems rather concerned and pushing for more red.

What I think DT need to be MORE worried about is knowingly DEFENDING observable liars and scammers and probable extortionists and shady escrows and ensuring through their inclusions they get into positions of trust and leaving the board vulnerable and possibly even facilitating scams here.

If it can be argued (which it likely can because the evidence has been presented many times to them personally in multiple threads) these DT members and even ADMIN were made aware of these prior super worrying instances of lying and scamming, extortion etc and they assisted in the red trust removal of those kinds of untrustworthy members, and deliberately included them into positions of trust. If those positions of trust were leveraged and found to be prime contributors to pulling the scam off and lots of people losing money..... then you see how that could look. Refusing to red trust, them, including them in DT,  even insisting their scam tags are REMOVED... looks like you are all complicit in anything they pull in future.

You have all had plenty of observable instances pushed under your noses about several DT members and their untrustworthy bordering on criminal behaviors and it looks to us like you are all colluding with them to give them a clean slate and let them appear super trustworthy 300 green trust no less.

That's how they may all be liable in the end for this corrupt behavior.  The negative feedback we have was left because we tried to warn members about these observable instances as to protect them from future scamming... they are using the red to silence whilstle blowers. Doubly damning for them if the shit hits the fan.

I think they will be held liable. Can't say it will be a shame either. Time to put the garbage out.




 

I am glad to know that you believe that anyone who does something you don’t like deserves to be slandered.

IMHO trying to dox someone out of spite also deserves a bright red warning. This is not the type of person you'd want to deal with, particularly if e.g. you need to share personal info (shipping address etc) in the deal.

Let's see.......likei said less wasting time on writing more actions.

Exactly.. I got more money and I live here.. ha ha ha

you do realise fighting against me here is like arguing with your mother - no means no my little flower..

anyway let me know when you are over and if you want ill meet you for a coffee to discuss your situation with me and the other members of DT.

I'm once a month in bulgaria meeting some business partners in sofia........i was even several years ago checking bulgaria as my new company location because of the 0% tax promotion at that time.
So no big deal for me and i know the corruption very well.

But lets see when i receive the docs

The negative trust setting leaves it open for users to express their belief.  

Thule's behavior has been libelous, which is a form of scam.  His attempt to defame suchmoon is clear as day.  He presented no evidence suchmoon scammed the mystery newbie, yet continued to treat the accusation as if it was a slam dunk, open and shut case.  I believe he did it out of retribution.

None of the reviews suggest that Thule attempted an out-right scam, but are expressing the opinion that Thule is untrustworthy, with which I totally agree.  

So I live in Bulgaria and have done for a few years, pretty sure 20 odd collectors who I have traded with will confirm this.

Best of luck with understanding the language and laws here princess.

You will be able to talk with him about your own case soon.
Will be a nice warning to the other.

How's your lawsuit against Vod coming?

Right continent - wrong country, 1500 miles away cunty.

I tell ya what. Ill give you part of the dox and you pay me that money then ill give you my full dox, ok princess?

Sofia - Bulgaria.

leaving a negative rating in itself is calling the person a scammer. Read the description of a negative rating on a trust page.

I'm not going to waste my time here anymore argumenting with your poor statement.
Thats something i declared myself.Less writing more actions.

Thanks to theymos he opened way more possibilities to me.

About TMAN i hope i will be able to hold him accountable.I hope he lives in the UK.Let's see somebody already initiating the escrow.


About the abusive feedbacks i will give enough time to proof that i scammed someone or tried to scam someone which would justify the strong belive that i'm a scammer.

Bitcointalk is not a right free space where people can defame and abuse without being hold liable for it.


TMAN just got my full attention for attacking under the waist.


I'm not here to harm anybody or waste my time but i will now activly defend myself from these kind of language and defamtion holding people accountable for their actions.

You can think its just random talk based on Vod since i let it go at that time but being now marked on every thread as scammer is exceeding my tolerance.

your like one of those prison lawyers you read about, think they are hot shit but end up getting people in trouble for different things due to the maximum level of retardedness