I decided to ignore the other feedback because i haven't following the those "wars"
However, when I looked at the first red tags you got and the reference links, I am pretty sure with your current attitude, even if the later tags were not considered, your reputation would still be not good.
Account buying/selling is an old thing that is no longer tolerable by the community since it's done by scammers and spammers
I think if you had been someone calmer and accepted you mistake and contributed more rather than attack people, you would be having a much better reputation, perhaps some DT members would even consider turning the feedback neutral given that you have been on the forum since 2014 but instead you decided to make a mountain out of the situation and climbing it is now impossible.
It is not for DT members to use their subjective opinions on other members attitudes as a basis to decide if they leave the scam tag or not.
This would leave DT open to gaming, abuse and seriously encroaching on free speech if this was inside their mandate. It is not.
There needs to be transparent guidelines that are applied equally to all members.
1. you need to present evidence they are a scammer
2. you need to present strong evidence they are trying to scam
that is your mandate, where does it say you get to judge how people speak to you after you have abused the trust system? how do you expect to be spoken to when you abuse trust here? f you can not meet those criteria you have no business leaving a scam tag.
What is more. There is a DT member nutildah who calling people EVIL, Villains, and scum for selling their accounts and claiming that it facilitated scamming. He then decided to turn into an Evil villain and facilitate scamming (his own claim) later on. He is obviously more untrustworthy than someone who buys an account on behalf of another person that does not consider them a scammer. The intent is clearly more toxic from the DT member nutildah but LAUDA and all the other DT members refuse to give him a scam tag. Double standards.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50719875I think DT members are fully complicit when refusing to leave scam tags for other DT members where there is clear evidence of lying for financial gain, or strong evidence for other financially motivated shady behaviors. They should be held liable for this for sure.
I see no references to a SCAM or SCAMMING On his feedback. Remove the red or apply the red to all those engaging in buying selling accounts.
Foxpoop your link proves what exactly?
This is the level of reasoning our current DT and merit sources are capable of.
you skam us of our time reading these threads.
your tags are accurate
What is that dishonest auction by proxy, trust abusing imbecile doing in any position of trust? the board is not that desperate is it?