Hmm..
Two Alts engaged in DT trust abuse:
You have a very weird set of standards for what constitutes trust abuse. That isn't trust abuse. However, this is:
As Loyvce said, I don't want to have to see your abusive shitsmear on any of my accounts.
Remind me again why people are looking down their noses at me for distrusting this person?
Because I've done nothing to warrant being distrusted by you or anyone else. What behaviour have I exhibited that gives you the opinion that I cannot be trusted on this forum? Do you you really think a joke is a reason to distrust someone and even worse leave negative feedback for? Of course, we all know that's not the reason you actually distrust me but it's the best justification you could come up with. You've distrusted me over nothing but a petty vendetta that goes back years and all because I originally excluded you from my trust list because of your often wildly inaccurate and abusive trusts that as we can see still continue to this day.
You also like to conveniently leave out the fact that it was
you who left me feedback from your two accounts first. I simply returned the favour. Of course, it's never trust abuse when you do it.
I'll dedicated a topic to this.
Rest assured I won't be joining that discussion - as I said last week:
Two of the three (three being 6.9% of the 43 UID's as reported today) are alts. It was canvassed in another thread their attacks on me. This person has subsequently left me alone (at least I presume they have - I have them on ignore and no one has alluded to their attacks continuing) - that said, perhaps it is time to review my previous trust feedback - I still think they would be untrustworthy in a trade, but I can convey that in neutrals I suppose.
I've been busy this week
Then chop-chop. What's taking you so long? You can't be that busy since making posts here and elsewhere takes longer than to hit that delete button on your abusive feedback.
I'm still catching up, "your case" is on my list to thoroughly check. 
