Pages:
Author

Topic: DT2 SUCHMOON ABUSE.Who voted him into trust circle ? (Read 24318 times)

legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
@thread...why do you assume suchmoon is a he??

Apparently some house wife . Although it is not really important.

Posts should be weighed on their own merit. Who makes the post is largely irrelevant.

However, suchmoon has made such ludicrous statements whilst also knowingly supporting proven liars into positions of trust and therefore we must not forget that when dealing with matters of trust.
full member
Activity: 194
Merit: 101
@thread...why do you assume suchmoon is a he??
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Still waiting for Lauda to participate in that open conversation.
Seems somebody is avoiding it at all cost
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
done with lauda now start with suchmoon, who is next? this is becoming boring already.
Suchmoon is a member of my Cult. Updated image coming soon.

OP it would have made more sense if you used your real account and complained about a particular tag rather than farting in the wind.
This. Nobody likes 'X user abuse' crypto-hunter style rants nowadays.

Well stop being scared let's have a debate laudaM just you and me. We will discuss your proven lie, trust abuse, and any other shady dealings you wish to clear up. Just us. We can clear it all up.

I mean if my claims are all just ranting with no substance why are you dodging me? let's have an open debate.

legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
done with lauda now start with suchmoon, who is next? this is becoming boring already.
Suchmoon is a member of my Cult. Updated image coming soon.

OP it would have made more sense if you used your real account and complained about a particular tag rather than farting in the wind.
This. Nobody likes 'X user abuse' crypto-hunter style rants nowadays.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE ?

Its not possible you have any evidence since i'm not Thule so i would love to see your so called evidence

Just send the damn PM and let's end this. How hard can it be if you're not lying?
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 6581
be constructive or S.T.F.U
done with lauda now start with suchmoon, who is next? this is becoming boring already.

OP it would have made more sense if you used your real account and complained about a particular tag rather than farting in the wind.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
regards to theymos' comment that controversial ratings should carry an actual risk/cost by way of a retaliatory rating, and there does not appear to be any risk/cost to suchmoon in this case.

There is nothing particularly controversial about this rating
Except the fact that you admit you don't have evidence beyond speculation to support your claim against the OP.

It looks to me that your rating was more intended to protect a position of power, and was less so about warning others about a potential scammer.

That's completely false. Repeating ad nauseum how I'm so fervid towards "a position of power" sounds like a projection on your part.

There is evidence, you don't accept it, I get that. I would be shocked otherwise, given that you're often sympathetic to puppeteers and have engaged in this form of art yourself.

LOL says the supporter of pharmacist a proven sock puppet racist trolling sig spammer. haha
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE ?

Its not possible you have any evidence since i'm not Thule so i would love to see your so called evidence
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
regards to theymos' comment that controversial ratings should carry an actual risk/cost by way of a retaliatory rating, and there does not appear to be any risk/cost to suchmoon in this case.

There is nothing particularly controversial about this rating
Except the fact that you admit you don't have evidence beyond speculation to support your claim against the OP.

It looks to me that your rating was more intended to protect a position of power, and was less so about warning others about a potential scammer.

That's completely false. Repeating ad nauseum how I'm so fervid towards "a position of power" sounds like a projection on your part.

There is evidence, you don't accept it, I get that. I would be shocked otherwise, given that you're often sympathetic to puppeteers and have engaged in this form of art yourself.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
regards to theymos' comment that controversial ratings should carry an actual risk/cost by way of a retaliatory rating, and there does not appear to be any risk/cost to suchmoon in this case.

There is nothing particularly controversial about this rating
Except the fact that you admit you don't have evidence beyond speculation to support your claim against the OP.

It looks to me that your rating was more intended to protect a position of power, and was less so about warning others about a potential scammer.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
How about you start showing evidence about my negativ tags when demanding something like that ?Demanding only evidence for DT members?
Double standards ?
This point is irrelevant. Moreover, I am not the one that needs to provide evidence for your negative tags.

Much like your statement of "I even saw 2 people being red tagged for making a deal", you put the onus on yourself by making a claim like this. This is why I ask for the threads from cryptohunter.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
But cryptohunter had something different in mind:
Quote
Have you seen how many high ranked accounts they have destroyed once somebody raised his voice against them ?
I would also like to hear cryptohunter's opinion on these tags, but before she give her opinion, let her post accounts which have been destroyed because they disagreed with someone.
My point was that most of the accounts I've seen were not tagged for any disagreements. Since I don't have time to pore over every thread and the onus isn't on me, cryptohunter must show evidence.

How about you start showing evidence about my negativ tags when demanding something like that ?Demanding only evidence for DT members?
Double standards ?
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
But cryptohunter had something different in mind:
Quote
Have you seen how many high ranked accounts they have destroyed once somebody raised his voice against them ?
I would also like to hear cryptohunter's opinion on these tags, but before she give her opinion, let her post accounts which have been destroyed because they disagreed with someone.
My point was that most of the accounts I've seen were not tagged for any disagreements. Since I don't have time to pore over every thread and the onus isn't on me, cryptohunter must show evidence.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
Have you seen how many high ranked accounts they have destroyed once somebody raised his voice against them ?
Which one?

Go to rep and have a look around plenty of older legends than you with far greater achievements.
NO.
You go to reputation and post evidence here.

Also, address this:
He can include some people that provide facts and observable events the gang does not want presented.
What gang?
List all members of this so called gang.

LAUDA MISUSING HER TRUST POWER
Negative tag: ICO Bumping
Payed shill.
Self admitted payed shill.
Lauda gave me a negative feedback.
Negative tag: Trust farming
I guess you don't see my feedback. That account is connected with, if I counted correctly, 24 accounts.
My Negative rating - Kind attention Lauda Sir/Ma'am
Negative tag: ICO bumping; merit abuse
That is correct.

But cryptohunter has something different in mind:
Quote
Have you seen how many high ranked accounts they have destroyed once somebody raised his voice against them ?
I would also like to hear cryptohunter's opinion on these tags, but before she give her opinion, let her post accounts which have been destroyed because they disagreed with someone.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
Quote
The account seller?
Show proof of your claim that he sold accounts.
As you are making up facts.
Okay, you got me. It was trading.

Hero Member with Legendary Potential
Current Posts: 550+
Current Potential Activity: 950+
No red trust, No loans, No scams, No hacks, Clean Account, No stake Address

Starting Bid: 0.03 btc
Buy it now: 0.065 btc
Bidding Increments: 0.002 btc

Escrow is accepted

If you accept escrow i will take it
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Quote
The account seller?

Show proof of your claim that he sold accounts.
As you are making up facts.
copper member
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
Go to rep and have a look around plenty of older legends than you with far greater achievements.
I went to LoyceV's thread to find "Lauda" threads in Reputation, for reference.

LAUDA MISUSING HER TRUST POWER
Negative tag: ICO Bumping

Calling all reputed members esp. Lauda, ibminer, The Pharmacist to my apology
Negative tag: ICO Bumping

Lauda gave me a negative feedback.
Negative tag: Trust farming

My Negative rating - Kind attention Lauda Sir/Ma'am
Negative tag: ICO bumping; merit abuse

Who will stop Lauda ?
Negative tag: Merit abuse; ban evasion
These are the first Hero+ users that I found, going through the threads randomly.
For example thule or all the legends when exposing lauda and his extortion
If you can show me who he scammed that he deseverd 150 negativ trust points you will get $1000 from me
The account seller trader?
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Have you seen how many high ranked accounts they have destroyed once somebody raised his voice against them ?
Which one?

For example thule or all the legends when exposing lauda and his extortion
If you can show me who he scammed that he deseverd 150 negativ trust points you will get $1000 from me
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
Have you seen how many high ranked accounts they have destroyed once somebody raised his voice against them ?
Which one?

Go to rep and have a look around plenty of older legends than you with far greater achievements.

Me for one. Who are these proven liars, scam supporters, implicated in extortion schemes gremlins to leave me red trust by their own admission for stating facts about their past.

Disgraceful and the opposite of what dt is meant for.

There are many other people in rep that are legends complaining of unfair red trust when their "crimes" are totally unrelated to scamming in any shape or form.

Then you have people that are proven liars, proven trust abusers and proven sock puppet racists trolling sig spammers giving this red trust out. These are proven and clearly observable facts.

Pages:
Jump to: