Have you seen how many high ranked accounts they have destroyed once somebody raised his voice against them ?
Which one?Lots of posts does not equate to a high rank BTW!
Topic: DT2 SUCHMOON ABUSE.Who voted him into trust circle ? - page 2. (Read 24318 times)
Lots of posts does not equate to a high rank BTW!
Have you seen how many high ranked accounts they have destroyed once somebody raised his voice against them ?
Which one? 
Have you seen how many high ranked accounts they have destroyed once somebody raised his voice against them ?
OP why not use your main account? Everyone free to share his opinions here. If you are on right way then why DT will tag you without any reason? Its seems you have created this account for fight with DT. You are self admitted that you are a alt of someone. Why really want to hide yourself? Are you worry about tag? If I say you are trying to make gang against DT member I don't think I will be wrong. If you are right then come on with your original account.
Not your call. He has explained he does not want trust abuse to ruin his main account. The sad state of DT has forced him to post under a sock puppet.
OP why not use your main account? Everyone free to share his opinions here. If you are on right way then why DT will tag you without any reason? Its seems you have created this account for fight with DT. You are self admitted that you are a alt of someone. Why really want to hide yourself? Are you worry about tag? If I say you are trying to make gang against DT member I don't think I will be wrong. If you are right then come on with your original account.
If thats not the total proof of DT's abuse i don't know.Bitcointalk always denied to make this kind of decission because of the abuse.Here Suchmoon even admits that he taggs without much proof because the account is a noob.You just decided that
There is proof. You being the accused one I don't expect you to agree with it. You being a noob doesn't mean that proof is not needed. It means that I don't have to consider your prior history here on Bitcoitalk because there is none, and I'm certainly not going to make any assumptions favorable to you.
How do you "stop" being a DT member?
Interesting challenge. First you should clear your trust list. But that might still leave you in DT2. To get out of it I'd suggest to add Quickseller to your trust list. That should do it.
Another option is to just go crypto-hunting across multiple boards but that's a lot of work.
He can include some people that provide facts and observable events the gang does not want presented.
What gang? No one forces you to be a DT member and tagg people without having time to check if the claims are valid according to you.
You have no time for it then just stop.Easy as that
How do you "stop" being a DT member?You have no time for it then just stop.Easy as that
He can request people stop including him
He can requests theymos black list him
He can include some people that provide facts and observable events the gang does not want presented.
stopping tagging is not an issue if he has no time
No one forces you to be a DT member and tagg people without having time to check if the claims are valid according to you.
You have no time for it then just stop.Easy as that
How do you "stop" being a DT member? You have no time for it then just stop.Easy as that
Jetcash has now added suchmoon - jetcash several times rejected facts and observable evidence of lies and untrustworthy behaviour and would not even review it. I would view them both as very unwise candidates for a trust system.
I have a life away from the Internet, and I have a lot of projects running on the net. I don't have the time, or the inclination to review every post and topic here. I don't receive any payments, and I don't have to seek approval from anybody as a result of being part of a signature campaign.
A post that is a wall of text has to be compelling to persuade me to read it. and if it just appears to be yet another duplicate post that has already been reviewed by many in the community, then I can see no merit in my endeavouring to understand the ramifications. This is especially true if it outside my areas of interest.
No one forces you to be a DT member and tagg people without having time to check if the claims are valid according to you.
You have no time for it then just stop.Easy as that
LOL okay well as a DT member I am sorry if clear evidence of another DT being a liar is outside of your interests.
I think that the fact that there is a diversity of interests in the ranks of the default trust members is evidence that it is decentralised. If you can't find anyone in the midst of this diversity who is prepared to espouse your cause, then you should realise that the community assigns little perceived value to it. You need some catchy slogans. Could I suggest "Speak clearer, not Lauda". "Improve your drive with TMAN". " For pain free posting - read The Pharmacist", " Vod - your V8 posting God". etc.
Sorry the common interest of DT should be trust . The fact you are not interested in proven untrustworthy behaviour is telling. No way out of it. The clue was in the title.
LOL okay well as a DT member I am sorry if clear evidence of another DT being a liar is outside of your interests.
I think that the fact that there is a diversity of interests in the ranks of the default trust members is evidence that it is decentralised. If you can't find anyone in the midst of this diversity who is prepared to espouse your cause, then you should realise that the community assigns little perceived value to it. You need some catchy slogans. Could I suggest "Speak clearer, not Lauda". "Improve your drive with TMAN". " For pain free posting - read The Pharmacist", " Vod - your V8 posting God". etc.
Jetcash has now added suchmoon - jetcash several times rejected facts and observable evidence of lies and untrustworthy behaviour and would not even review it. I would view them both as very unwise candidates for a trust system.
I have a life away from the Internet, and I have a lot of projects running on the net. I don't have the time, or the inclination to review every post and topic here. I don't receive any payments, and I don't have to seek approval from anybody as a result of being part of a signature campaign.
A post that is a wall of text has to be compelling to persuade me to read it. and if it just appears to be yet another duplicate post that has already been reviewed by many in the community, then I can see no merit in my endeavouring to understand the ramifications. This is especially true if it outside my areas of interest.
would you read a wall of text from me bud?
I dont get why this fool keeps on trying to disrupt the forum - tags aint going, no one is listening
Because I post facts and observable events maybe whilst you post sexual deviance and continuously demonstrate you are a low functioning imbecile? not to mention a self confessed trust abuser? implicated in an extortion scheme?
Why are you still on this board is what I am wondering.
Jetcash has now added suchmoon - jetcash several times rejected facts and observable evidence of lies and untrustworthy behaviour and would not even review it. I would view them both as very unwise candidates for a trust system.
I have a life away from the Internet, and I have a lot of projects running on the net. I don't have the time, or the inclination to review every post and topic here. I don't receive any payments, and I don't have to seek approval from anybody as a result of being part of a signature campaign.
A post that is a wall of text has to be compelling to persuade me to read it. and if it just appears to be yet another duplicate post that has already been reviewed by many in the community, then I can see no merit in my endeavouring to understand the ramifications. This is especially true if it outside my areas of interest.
would you read a wall of text from me bud?
I dont get why this fool keeps on trying to disrupt the forum - tags aint going, no one is listening
Jetcash has now added suchmoon - jetcash several times rejected facts and observable evidence of lies and untrustworthy behaviour and would not even review it. I would view them both as very unwise candidates for a trust system.
I have a life away from the Internet, and I have a lot of projects running on the net. I don't have the time, or the inclination to review every post and topic here. I don't receive any payments, and I don't have to seek approval from anybody as a result of being part of a signature campaign.
A post that is a wall of text has to be compelling to persuade me to read it. and if it just appears to be yet another duplicate post that has already been reviewed by many in the community, then I can see no merit in my endeavouring to understand the ramifications. This is especially true if it outside my areas of interest.
LOL okay well as a DT member I am sorry if clear evidence of another DT being a liar is outside of your interests.
Jetcash has now added suchmoon - jetcash several times rejected facts and observable evidence of lies and untrustworthy behaviour and would not even review it. I would view them both as very unwise candidates for a trust system.
I have a life away from the Internet, and I have a lot of projects running on the net. I don't have the time, or the inclination to review every post and topic here. I don't receive any payments, and I don't have to seek approval from anybody as a result of being part of a signature campaign.
A post that is a wall of text has to be compelling to persuade me to read it. and if it just appears to be yet another duplicate post that has already been reviewed by many in the community, then I can see no merit in my endeavouring to understand the ramifications. This is especially true if it outside my areas of interest.
suchmoon: 23
Trusted by:
That's not good, my name is missed from that list. I've just added suchmoon, thanks itomarketing for reminding me!Trusted by:
- Suchmoon is an excellent forum member.
It's a newbie. Of course it takes more evidence to red-tag an established account, as seen in my feedback on mdayonliner/S_Therapist. But it's gonna be a zoo here if we start demanding the same level of proof for total noobs, self-admittedly posting just to poke some users in the eye.
And yes, linguistic proof combined with the other stuff mentioned in the reference is enough for this newbie. No chance this can be a coincidence. I'd rather believe all those ETH-address-sharing alts are indeed "friends and family" than the OP being not Thule. Anyone disagreeing with that feel free to counter the rating, red-trust me, un-include me, exclude me, include Thule and cryptohunter - numerous options are available and I don't retaliate so don't worry about that.
There is nothing particularly controversial about this rating other than your attempt to help the OP to blow it out of proportion. By your twisted logic I shouldn't be leaving any ratings at all because there is no recourse for anyone tagged by me - in addition to your point about me not trading, I also don't give a shit about any "positions" on the forum so exclusions/public shaming/banning won't work either. Well, banning kinda works for any future red tags so you might want to pursue that route.
And yes, linguistic proof combined with the other stuff mentioned in the reference is enough for this newbie. No chance this can be a coincidence. I'd rather believe all those ETH-address-sharing alts are indeed "friends and family" than the OP being not Thule. Anyone disagreeing with that feel free to counter the rating, red-trust me, un-include me, exclude me, include Thule and cryptohunter - numerous options are available and I don't retaliate so don't worry about that.
regards to theymos' comment that controversial ratings should carry an actual risk/cost by way of a retaliatory rating, and there does not appear to be any risk/cost to suchmoon in this case.
There is nothing particularly controversial about this rating other than your attempt to help the OP to blow it out of proportion. By your twisted logic I shouldn't be leaving any ratings at all because there is no recourse for anyone tagged by me - in addition to your point about me not trading, I also don't give a shit about any "positions" on the forum so exclusions/public shaming/banning won't work either. Well, banning kinda works for any future red tags so you might want to pursue that route.
the pharmacist is a proven sock puppet racist trolling shill sig spammer - red trust him
lauda ia a proven liar red trust him
tman is a self confessed trust abuser go red trust him
like I say you have doulble standards which are clearly evidence and support knowingly liars and other untrustworthy individuals this is clear and observable hence you are untrustworthy.
Jetcash has now added suchmoon - jetcash several times rejected facts and observable evidence of lies and untrustworthy behaviour and would not even review it. I would view them both as very unwise candidates for a trust system.
Carified by who?A bunch of self predicted assholes ?
Majority of bitcointalk members instantly acciocates negativ trust with being a scammer.You just need to read the post of people to members with negativ trust and you would instantly destroy your stupid ass claim.
Majority of bitcointalk members instantly acciocates negativ trust with being a scammer.You just need to read the post of people to members with negativ trust and you would instantly destroy your stupid ass claim.
Jump to: