I mostly play plinko and chase big multipliers, plinko can wager really nicely but prepare balance for long loss streaks before hitting 1000x. The average ratio per 1000x plinko ball is 1 in 32k nonce approximately.
Insane, this is probably the first time that someone told me that they wagered on plinko for tickets. I'd rather go for dice though because its way faster although that the max multiplier is capped to 9900 but its close enough to 10k in plinko. Anyway gratz on getting over 1k tickets, thats over 100k wagered so high chances on actually getting something in return from the draw
The house edge is the same so mathematically there is no difference between wagering in dice and plinko. The good thing in plinko is that there is a chance for him to hit various multiplier at every single bet while he cant hit it with dice because most players wagering with dice are using something like 1.02x-2x. Even though the risk look bigger in plinko but the chance to recover loses in plinko is bigger than in dice. The other good thing in plinko is that there is a guarantee bet back at least 20% in every bet, means that we will not lose our whole bet amount for every single bet unless we play the row with 10k max multiplier because there is possibility to hit 0x.
