EB94 – Gavin Andresen: On The Blocksize And Bitcoin's Governance - page 3.

Mickeyb

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Move On !!!!!!

Quote from: brg444 on August 31, 2015, 04:21:34 PM

Quote from: hdbuck on August 31, 2015, 03:52:05 PM

Bitcoin doesn't need governance: Bitcoin is governance.

PS: Ph0rk you Gavin!

Lessons in propaganda: teaching the controversy.

"This is not about the block size but really about Bitcoin governance. It doesn't suit populist interests and we should change it!"

Hmmm, interesting how people must politicize everything, to satisfy their egos and make themselves feel good and important, even though the things they are trying to politicize weren't meant to get politicized and we're invented exactly to fight against this politicization.

brg444

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 504

Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks

Quote from: hdbuck on August 31, 2015, 03:52:05 PM

Bitcoin doesn't need governance: Bitcoin is governance.

PS: Ph0rk you Gavin!

Lessons in propaganda: teaching the controversy.

"This is not about the block size but really about Bitcoin governance. It doesn't suit populist interests and we should change it!"

hdbuck

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1002

Bitcoin doesn't need governance: Bitcoin is governance.

PS: Ph0rk you Gavin!

Meuh6879

legendary

Activity: 1512

Merit: 1012

Remark : they don't know peripheric microphone .... ? Wink

kingcolex

sr. member

Activity: 254

Merit: 1258

Quote from: Denker on August 31, 2015, 03:31:27 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8l11q9hsJM

Quote

As the debate about the blocksize continues to roar through the Bitcoin community, Gavin Andresen joins us to take a step back and ask the big questions: How should these decisions be made in the first place? What does the governance of Bitcoin look like now and what do we want it to look like in the future?

In a challenging time for Bitcoin, it's a critical discussion to have with the Chief Scientist of the Bitcoin Foundation and successor of Satoshi. We cover everything from the current blocksize debate to the nature of forks to how decisions will be made in Bitcoin XT.

Topics covered included:
- MIT Digital Currency Initiative
- The way Gavin thinks about Bitcoin
- How were decisions made throughout Bitcoin's history
- What the Nakamoto/market consensus is
- Forking the software vs a fork of the blockchain
- Who should make decisions in Bitcoin and how the interest of different stakeholders should be reconciled
- Why the desirable state is to move towards many different implementations
- How decisions will be made for the Bitcoin XT code base

Odd who has declared him the "successor of Satoshi" this seems to put more leadership into him when Bitcoin is no longer being lead by single person and is about working as a community for changes.

Denker

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8l11q9hsJM

Quote

As the debate about the blocksize continues to roar through the Bitcoin community, Gavin Andresen joins us to take a step back and ask the big questions: How should these decisions be made in the first place? What does the governance of Bitcoin look like now and what do we want it to look like in the future?

In a challenging time for Bitcoin, it's a critical discussion to have with the Chief Scientist of the Bitcoin Foundation and successor of Satoshi. We cover everything from the current blocksize debate to the nature of forks to how decisions will be made in Bitcoin XT.

Topics covered included:
- MIT Digital Currency Initiative
- The way Gavin thinks about Bitcoin
- How were decisions made throughout Bitcoin's history
- What the Nakamoto/market consensus is
- Forking the software vs a fork of the blockchain
- Who should make decisions in Bitcoin and how the interest of different stakeholders should be reconciled
- Why the desirable state is to move towards many different implementations
- How decisions will be made for the Bitcoin XT code base

Topic: EB94 – Gavin Andresen: On The Blocksize And Bitcoin's Governance - page 3. (Read 1873 times)