Topic: eddie13 (Read 514 times)

4 of my replies was deleted by moderator. Ok. Support scammers, supports scams, do what ever you like. I do not care any more. This forum became the home of scammers and their supporters. You can steal peoples money, scam them e.t.c.

NOBODY WILL STOP YOU. NOBODY WILL PUNISH YOU.

I am out of this website. 

Ok..
I won't be leaving him red trust but I also won't be strongly disagreeing with anyone that does..

This has been quite uneventful.. I guess I'll go back to ignoring him now..

I think at the very least he needs to be out of DT (done already) and labeled as a somewhat-unstable individual (done already). Beyond that it's kinda moot. The totality of shady shit he's involved in is quite impressive but I don't know if it's a high-risk now that he doesn't have the "trustworthy DT member" badge anymore.

Though I doubt he is a credible threat or can afford anything anyway..

Him being continually late on loans that he takes over and over to "pay bills" doesn't make me think he has any money to invest into investigating anything..
Also looks pretty "high risk" to me..

____________________________________


Probably just about as "tangible" of a threat as a middleschooler threatening to kick my ass on some minecraft chat..

LOL, I misread teeGUMES rating, my apologies.

What made you change your mind from a red tag being justified to being bullshit? Just curious.

If there is a tangible threat of something happening IRL like calling the police - maybe.

But as far as I can tell all this is just keyboard warrior crap à la cryptohunter and a red tag probably would just inflame it even more. Neuter him as Steamtyme said.

Oh wait, you already did

Like you say in that thread OP needs to learn. This is clearly retaliatory due to you calling him out, but really just reflects poorly on them. I disagree with a red tag on them for just being slanderous and wrong, I think neutral tags would suffice. Now if you think they are likely to scam someone or can show that then a red makes sense.

I know it's not what people like to hear but that's the system and it can work. If trusted Neutral feedback is just as visible as Negative or Positive.

1. I didn't edit anything trying to hide anything..

2. If I thought UNB was a "scam" do you think I would have posted in great detail about my "involvement" with it? I think not..

3. I came along AFTER the creation of UNB.. My extent of "involvement" was me trading it a lot, me shilling it a bit because it was (and still is) one of my favorite coins, and me helping to function test some other relates sites by JB such as unbreakableauctions.com (I think it was), possibly the first crypto auction site like ebay..

4. I was never paid by JB for anything.. I never did any paid work, I never got any bounties of UNB, I was never given any stake in UNB for my involvement or anything like that..

5. UNB was not a scam IMO.. Just a failed coin among the many many many other failed coins of the era.. It was only a SHA256 Bitcoin clone coin.. Nothing special really..

6. I was not involved at all with EBOOST or VOXULES and frankly I know very little about them.. I never invested in them or even traded them as far as I can recall..
Were they "scams"? Or just other failed projects? I'm not sure they were scams.. Any shitcoin experts want to chime in about the specifics of them being "scams"?
I was not "involved" with JB during these times.. I only very rarely conversed with JB after Cryptsy fell, that long ago..

7. I doubt that Jim Blasko is even a scammer.. As far as I know he was just the coin dev for those coins (VOX and EBOOST) and if they screwed people over JB was probably screwed right along with everyone else, at least in damage to his reputation by being involved with whatever projects didn't follow through with whatever..

8. I am NOT Jim Blasko, lol..



You go ahead and contact Halsey Minor and Michael Turpin etc.. I doubt they even know I exist..

As far as I know Jim is not dead.. I have his email address, and telegram.. If you want them, then look them up on the net because they are right there..
I don't know what "social media" accounts he may or may not have because I don't do the "social media" thing other than very rarely..

I will not be bothering him to drag him into this nonsense drama but you go ahead and get ahold of all of them guys and ask them about me all you want..


Isn't this the 3rd time now you are trying to label me as a scammer over UNBreakablecoin?
Think it will work this time?
You can't find anything else to try to use against me?
Great scam biter can't find anything on me other than I used to trade UNB a lot on Cryptsy?


Here is the last rep thread mooseprong started about me with the same claims.. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/eddie13-reputation-5208212




Previous claims about the same thing..



At what point will these unfounded attacks against me be worthy of a red tag in your opinion SM?
Making all sorts of false claims about me and threatening to call lawyers, police, and crap on me over this same topic and possibly even trying to blackmail me over it to shut up about his misdeeds..


He is just pissed at me over this thread (that I just bumped) https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/mosprognoz-needs-to-learn-5207250
Everyone should go read all of that thread to see what is going on here..

Your trust rating on the OP is still bullshit regardless of how deluded or childish or non-English he is.

Sorry, reading comprehension issues. Please don't tag me

I don't know if this is just a English as a second language thing or if this "investigation" is truly just at a child's level. I was even rethinking the red I left for OP because it seemed like he was leaving the drama alone and going back to what he does best but reading this trash is just wow.. definitely worked yourself up to a ~

Not really, you only have to read half of the OP because he copied the same thing twice in some weird way.

Really? I have to read all of this now?

It makes me sad when members who are supposed to make this forum a clean place and guide newbies start fighting each other, smearing each other's reputation over something that could have been solved at a personal level through forgiveness or agreeing to move on.

No one is perfect here...the question is are we ready to learn from our mistakes and reform?
Are we ready to take advice from anyone without creating a mountain out of a small issue?

I know we can't make everyone to do what we would like them to but where this is headed doesn't feel good and sucks IMO.

this is what people are talking about when they denounce "throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks".

another thread where the OP is filled with unproven accusations and "guilt by association" bullshit. you're just fishing to see if you can get other people to publicly turn against eddie13.

it's not a good look.

If something is not personal then you should pm the person you have questions about and try to get your answers. Making a thread such as this 1 definitely looks extremely personal.

I don't see that way as you see, you should check my trust list. Anyways, that are things I got entangled for a newbie mistake I did in the past which I even apologized to the users sending me ratings, but "forgiveness" doesn't seems to be much spread out around here even after repeated reminders of our dear theymos.

I think even you should take the same advice and let go your grudge on Eddie. Looks like he is already ignoring you for good.

Sure, appropriate. It is also appropriate for the community to then immediately expect him to substantiate his claims with SOMETHING other than simply claims right?

Well, it looks like eddie13 only left a neutral for OP, and as far as this thread goes it's just a discussion of the issues OP has with eddie13.  If there's no merit to these accusations, OP isn't going to get a lot of support from the community--and it's entirely appropriate for a member to start a thread like this rather than jumping right to leaving negs and starting flags, no?

I don't know him all that well, but I don't recall him ever being involved with a scam, though he's gotten into some heated debate about some forum issues.  I'm not convinced that what OP presented here is evidence that he tried to scam anyone or was involved in a project during which he knew it to be a scam.  This looks like OP trying to exact some revenge because of eddie13's accusations against him by trying his hardest to sling some mud.

Nice try to make this about your crusade but your standards wouldn't prevent moronic threads unless you also have some secret plans for censorship.