Topic: Effect of amazon fire ? (Read 538 times)

The amazon sustains itself and the living things within it. Though the lack of urgency about the fire can make a learned man shake his head, it's hardly going to have a lasting effect on most of us that live away from it. Oxygen mostly comes from those small things in the ocean. I think the title lungs of the earth is romanticized a little too much. Though that doesn't mean it's not as important. A lot of animal lives were lost and that's what breaks my heart more.

How it would never be a problem if you said that it can cause a faster climate change? The food Web can be affected on this case and also you, you can affect also by this even you are not besides amazon forest, not now but soon I think.

even if the whole amazon forest disappeared/burned down the oxygen supply is never the problem because the oxygen produces by amazon forest barely leaves
the forest because the oxygen is almost up by the species, organism, microbes etc.. that are living there(like I said at the first page of this thread). the main problem
we would have is that the trees in amazon forest absorb Co² in the atmosphere and without the amazon forest the CO² would remain in the atmosphere
and will contribute to a faster climate change.

It not suddenly take affect because we have a supply but of course when the time comes we can feel it by the huge number of oxygen given off by trees that's why the population take a lot of oxygen but we have a limited supply so it can cause from people to die, not immediately but their lives become shorter.

BOOM? Just BOOM and that's it???

LUNGS?

Wow.

Now you have me worried. I don't know if I will be able to sleep tonight.

Just imagine a human without lungs. He'll die.

Earth will be slowly dying without the Amazon. The ecosystem will become imbalance which will cause the food chain and habitats to become broken.

It's a domino effect which will also affect the humanity to become extinct.

maybe some endangered species also gone because of that the food wed can affect and also our supply of food affected.  It takes too long before it get back because it's not easy to recover it again.  It also affect our ozone layer and it takes our life get shorter by taking a short amount of oxygen given by a trees.

Unfortunately it seems that your grasp of thermodynamics is quite typical of those who are wetting themselves over 'global warming.'

Sometimes two people are so far apart on...um...reality that it's kinda impossible to communicate.  Case in point:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cesSRfXqS1Q

Edit:  A guy can just tell that Ol' Hank was a warmunista and he would say some funny shit about it.  Sure enough, in about 30 seconds of looking:

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3cf-oqEDr4

After that incident, there will be another problem for us to face. We as human beings are now prone to another global problem on our planet. consider that we have already achieve the devastating result from our failure to clean our planet to stop global warming, Now the problem is more and more critical because there will be fewer trees to stop the heat from the sun to directly hit our planet. Expect to feel more temperature when you go out of your houses. As I experience it my self, It was already 3 pm when I was walking in our local market but the heat of the sun is like 12 noon. this is the problem we are facing now and it is almost impossible to stop.

The answer to that question is simple and plain that if the amazon forest get burn then there will be natural catastrophic events all over the globe as these forest are considered the LUNGS of the world and if something happen to the lungs then all system in that case whole ecosystem will started to collapse and when they will reach the threshold then whole planet will go BOOM with different natural disasters.

Thats what will happen if amazon get burn. But thats a big IF so ....

^^^ I concur.     

The 'lungs of the earth' is a jingly sound-bite for people who really don't have even the slightest idea of even the most basic science behind any of this stuff.

Seems like it is very very common these days for lands which 'environmentalists' seek to take control over to mysteriously catch fire.

I use air-quotes around 'environmentalist' because these people really have no relationship to environmentalists of 40 years ago or environmentalists such as myself.  Most people who are labeled environmentalists these days are basically terrorist funded by the global elite who's job is to arrange for their funders to have complete control over lands and resources.  For every one of these 'neo-environmentalists' there are about 10,000 drooling idiots who get off on catchy phrases like 'lungs of the earth' and who will believe in the hearts that humans eating ungulates will kill the whole planet.

The tiny fraction of global elite bankers basically bought the 'environmentalist movement' in part by first buying the so-called 'education system'.  When you can produce an infinite amount of money out of nothing you can, over time, buy just about anything you like.

Back to the fires in the Amazon, from what little research I've done they don't seem particularly extraordinary this year compared to the historical record.  Seems like the main feature is that the global elite decided to move this 'get the Amazon' project forward and are using their 'social media properties' as one of the tools to do so.  And probably some local operatives with their cans of diesel as well.

Amazon is known as the lungs of earth and definitely if lungs get damage whole body will face threat and the most intimidating part is speed with which it got burn.

Ok i'm just realizing now that "semobo" is the author of the thread  

I am not that kind of person though because for something which needs to be grower to give us meat which itself needs plants to eat for themselves so without plants the whole system will collapse.

No it's a new account that i made today because i got a negative feedback saying that my main account is an alt account (which is not the case) but the feedback is not moderated according to others members on the forum. So i had to make a new account like people adviced me to do (because i have a project to expose, so i can't use an account with a negative feedback...). My old account is "StonerStanley" so i don't know who is "Semobo" and i have nothing to hide.

Omnivorous human don't require the entire planet at the moment but more and more everyday, and it kills a lot of animals for nothing helpful to be honest. I have been omnivorus
for decade and i was insulting the vegans, now i'm vegan. Eating meat is responsible for more than 60% of the deforestation of the Amazon without talking about how much water we need
to make the meat (and the fact that we could eat only plants so it's useless to kill animals)

It's not the subject of the debate but i'm just saying.

And what, my english is so bad ?  

Your English and style sure is a good match for Semobo.  So is the style and use of logic.  Same person (or algorithm)?

Anyway, if omnivorous humans required the 'entire planet' to be grazing lands in order to satisfy their needs for meat, then why is the 'entire planet' not currently deforested?

This fire won't have more impact than people who are eating meat and where we need to deforest the entire planet just for making their meat. Without talking about greenhouse gas.

Better get some firewood and burn it from your places to get warm.Its more economical though.

Effect of amazon fire?

Some people who live above the Arctic Circle, are moving there (the amazon) just to get warm.