Hello Everyone,
I am just uploading everything to mediafire then I will update the OP with the new wallets and to confirm with everyone I am currently on block 21078 with my wallet and everything is synced nice and fine and working properly so I will upload everything to the OP momentarily.
Thanks again to everyone in the community that helped out with everything when I couldn't fix this problem on my own. I am truly grateful about all of this and will be contacting the exchanges as well to update everything to the proper working code and wallets and hopefully we can get everything back on track now.
Thanks,
Have a Great Day
EinaiOraCoinDev
Topic: EinaiOraCoin [EOC] 365% POS Very stable coin with lots coming this summer for it - page 15. (Read 40221 times)
July 28, 2015, 04:21:59 PM
July 28, 2015, 04:04:37 PM
July 28, 2015, 03:57:57 PM
I must say,the dev has my confidence and trust. I cant wait to buy.
Vegas
Vegas
July 28, 2015, 03:54:14 PM
I think it says so much about the dev, as he has gone through many troubles and has not given up. I certainly will be investing in this coin with such a good dev with a "no quit attitude!!!" AWESOME!!
When new wallet is fixed Ill post on my website and endorse it. I get around 20,000 hits a week. All crypto enthustiasts.
www.bitcoinlasvegas.net
Vegas
I just really respect that after all the problems that he has endured with this coin not only did he "NOT QUIT" but he had no shame whatsoever telling the community that he was unable to fix the problem and reached out for the help to have it fixed properly and also never once asked the community to pay for any of the expenses that he may have incurred on this project When new wallet is fixed Ill post on my website and endorse it. I get around 20,000 hits a week. All crypto enthustiasts.
www.bitcoinlasvegas.net
Vegas
That says a lot right there to me that this guy honestly cares about his community and doesn't think that lying to them about things is the way to go about it One of the only reasons I got into EOC in the first place 
Cheersseems to be one of the best unexpected features of cryptocurrency; half the time its not even about the coins/worth, its about the journey and being involved.. just having your own currency is reason enough for some - dev now has url's/code - i will hang about for a bit just in case..
July 28, 2015, 03:51:10 PM
I think it says so much about the dev, as he has gone through many troubles and has not given up. I certainly will be investing in this coin with such a good dev with a "no quit attitude!!!" AWESOME!!
When new wallet is fixed Ill post on my website and endorse it. I get around 20,000 hits a week. All crypto enthustiasts.
www.bitcoinlasvegas.net
Vegas
I just really respect that after all the problems that he has endured with this coin not only did he "NOT QUIT" but he had no shame whatsoever telling the community that he was unable to fix the problem and reached out for the help to have it fixed properly and also never once asked the community to pay for any of the expenses that he may have incurred on this project When new wallet is fixed Ill post on my website and endorse it. I get around 20,000 hits a week. All crypto enthustiasts.
www.bitcoinlasvegas.net
Vegas
That says a lot right there to me that this guy honestly cares about his community and doesn't think that lying to them about things is the way to go about it One of the only reasons I got into EOC in the first place Cheers July 28, 2015, 03:48:14 PM
July 28, 2015, 03:47:51 PM
I think it says so much about the dev, as he has gone through many troubles and has not given up. I certainly will be investing in this coin with such a good dev with a "no quit attitude!!!" AWESOME!!
When new wallet is fixed Ill post on my website and endorse it. I get around 20,000 hits a week. All crypto enthustiasts.
www.bitcoinlasvegas.net
Vegas
When new wallet is fixed Ill post on my website and endorse it. I get around 20,000 hits a week. All crypto enthustiasts.
www.bitcoinlasvegas.net
Vegas
July 28, 2015, 03:45:04 PM
Hello Everyone,
I just want to thank everyone who helped out with getting this problem fixed and especially BarryStyles who has made the new updated wallets for this fix. As soon as I receive everything from Barry I will update the OP and the code in the source with everything up to date.
I have also already contacted the person who set up the blockexplorer to get that updated and fixed ASAP as well.
Thanks,
Have a Great Day
EinaiOraCoinDev
I just want to thank everyone who helped out with getting this problem fixed and especially BarryStyles who has made the new updated wallets for this fix. As soon as I receive everything from Barry I will update the OP and the code in the source with everything up to date.
I have also already contacted the person who set up the blockexplorer to get that updated and fixed ASAP as well.
Thanks,
Have a Great Day
EinaiOraCoinDev
July 28, 2015, 03:34:50 PM
Appears we have a comedian in here:
{
"addr" : "24.7.144.109:8737",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1438111978,
"lastrecv" : 1438111978,
"bytessent" : 223,
"bytesrecv" : 323,
"conntime" : 1438111976,
"version" : 70018,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.1.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 20987,
"banscore" : 0
},
Everyone, feel free to packet this IP - hasn't updated the version number that matters regardless..
{
"addr" : "24.7.144.109:8737",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1438111978,
"lastrecv" : 1438111978,
"bytessent" : 223,
"bytesrecv" : 323,
"conntime" : 1438111976,
"version" : 70018,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.1.2/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 20987,
"banscore" : 0
},
Everyone, feel free to packet this IP - hasn't updated the version number that matters regardless..
July 28, 2015, 03:21:51 PM
ok, win client syncs past block 20987..
going to nudge the version to 70019, also set the caddr_time_version so this wallet becomes a mandatory fork, recompile, send to dev.. lets hope this time it compiles bit quicker
going to nudge the version to 70019, also set the caddr_time_version so this wallet becomes a mandatory fork, recompile, send to dev.. lets hope this time it compiles bit quicker
July 28, 2015, 03:14:31 PM
@kevin1234a: Ty for your appreciation, glad I could help. I do not need any bounty, I was just curious and am still learning the ins and outs of blockchain tech.
That said, I believe just getting the chain to move is ev. not sufficient, I suspect since everybody mined a few blocks on his own chain, we are now all on a different fork. The one mining away the most of these cheap blocks will probably win the race for longest chain (Fork-Fest anyone?).
Also regarding muddafudda's fix: As I suspect the problem arose because a block with invalid time (in the future) was accepted by the chain and resulted in a negative target spacing I could imagine it would be better to trigger the fix not from time but from a block number.
And I would also like to ask the experts around if it wouldn't make sense to bump the clients version number if that hasn't been done already?
Hopefully somebody with more insight could comment on my above points.
Happy to see some movement again with EOC, I like the coins specs.
That said, I believe just getting the chain to move is ev. not sufficient, I suspect since everybody mined a few blocks on his own chain, we are now all on a different fork. The one mining away the most of these cheap blocks will probably win the race for longest chain (Fork-Fest anyone?).
Also regarding muddafudda's fix: As I suspect the problem arose because a block with invalid time (in the future) was accepted by the chain and resulted in a negative target spacing I could imagine it would be better to trigger the fix not from time but from a block number.
And I would also like to ask the experts around if it wouldn't make sense to bump the clients version number if that hasn't been done already?
Hopefully somebody with more insight could comment on my above points.
Happy to see some movement again with EOC, I like the coins specs.
well all target spacing things are to complicated for me so i 'll keep this discussion open for other experts. as far as my support concern i found like the honesty of dev and try my level best to help dev earlier and now barry too or anyone else. bounty was just for appreciating your and others help im not a dev just trying to be one day hopefully
July 28, 2015, 03:05:56 PM
@kevin1234a: Ty for your appreciation, glad I could help. I do not need any bounty, I was just curious and am still learning the ins and outs of blockchain tech.
That said, I believe just getting the chain to move is ev. not sufficient, I suspect since everybody mined a few blocks on his own chain, we are now all on a different fork. The one mining away the most of these cheap blocks will probably win the race for longest chain (Fork-Fest anyone?).
Also regarding muddafudda's fix: As I suspect the problem arose because a block with invalid time (in the future) was accepted by the chain and resulted in a negative target spacing I could imagine it would be better to trigger the fix not from time but from a block number.
And I would also like to ask the experts around if it wouldn't make sense to bump the clients version number if that hasn't been done already?
Hopefully somebody with more insight could comment on my above points.
Happy to see some movement again with EOC, I like the coins specs.
That said, I believe just getting the chain to move is ev. not sufficient, I suspect since everybody mined a few blocks on his own chain, we are now all on a different fork. The one mining away the most of these cheap blocks will probably win the race for longest chain (Fork-Fest anyone?).
Also regarding muddafudda's fix: As I suspect the problem arose because a block with invalid time (in the future) was accepted by the chain and resulted in a negative target spacing I could imagine it would be better to trigger the fix not from time but from a block number.
And I would also like to ask the experts around if it wouldn't make sense to bump the clients version number if that hasn't been done already?
Hopefully somebody with more insight could comment on my above points.
Happy to see some movement again with EOC, I like the coins specs.
Once i've confirmed that the wallet syncs past 20987 altogether, i'll bump the version, send changes to dev.. i forgot to change the initial addnode when launching test, so resyncing again..
July 28, 2015, 03:01:48 PM
@kevin1234a: Ty for your appreciation, glad I could help. I do not need any bounty, I was just curious and am still learning the ins and outs of blockchain tech.
That said, I believe just getting the chain to move is ev. not sufficient, I suspect since everybody mined a few blocks on his own chain, we are now all on a different fork. The one mining away the most of these cheap blocks will probably win the race for longest chain (Fork-Fest anyone?).
Also regarding muddafudda's fix: As I suspect the problem arose because a block with invalid time (in the future) was accepted by the chain and resulted in a negative target spacing I could imagine it would be better to trigger the fix not from time but from a block number.
And I would also like to ask the experts around if it wouldn't make sense to bump the clients version number if that hasn't been done already?
Hopefully somebody with more insight could comment on my above points.
Happy to see some movement again with EOC, I like the coins specs.
That said, I believe just getting the chain to move is ev. not sufficient, I suspect since everybody mined a few blocks on his own chain, we are now all on a different fork. The one mining away the most of these cheap blocks will probably win the race for longest chain (Fork-Fest anyone?).
Also regarding muddafudda's fix: As I suspect the problem arose because a block with invalid time (in the future) was accepted by the chain and resulted in a negative target spacing I could imagine it would be better to trigger the fix not from time but from a block number.
And I would also like to ask the experts around if it wouldn't make sense to bump the clients version number if that hasn't been done already?
Hopefully somebody with more insight could comment on my above points.
Happy to see some movement again with EOC, I like the coins specs.
July 28, 2015, 02:57:57 PM
cool keep it up
please confirm your block height with this post i'll update it time to time until we have working block explorer
current block height is : 21073
please confirm your block height with this post i'll update it time to time until we have working block explorer
current block height is : 21073
July 28, 2015, 02:51:06 PM
testing..
July 28, 2015, 02:13:16 PM
We'll see - wrestling with compile errors, standard fare QT stuff
July 28, 2015, 02:05:05 PM
No problem - WinQT/64 wallet is 15 minutes away, just compiling libraries
compile for 32bit pls :$
and i revised bounties post included you init as well
July 28, 2015, 01:52:15 PM
No problem - WinQT/64 wallet is 15 minutes away, just compiling libraries
July 28, 2015, 01:50:56 PM
Confirm pls
version" : "nvc-v1.1.1.build-g32a928e-bdb-gcc",
"protocolversion" : 70018,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"unspendable" : 0.00000000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 21057,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"moneysupply" : 1258219.89093600,
"connections" : 1,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "192.52.166.80",
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 0.00263536,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.03124954
},
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1438068987,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00010000,
"mininput" : 0.00010000,
"errors" : ""
root@chainserv:/usr/coin/EiniaOraNewSourceCode/src# ./EiniaOraCoind -daemon -rpcuser=x -rpcpassword=x -rpcallowip=10.0.1.* -rpcport=8736 -datadir=datadir getmininginfo
{
"blocks" : 21057,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 0.00263536,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.03124954,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 1000000,
"netmhashps" : 0.00117585,
"netstakeweight" : 715099.32003838,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeinputs" : 0,
"stakeinterest" : 3650000,
"testnet" : false
}
thanks barry we need 2 or 3 others to confirm and declare this a correct chain since BE in op also needs to be updated
July 28, 2015, 01:49:27 PM
Confirm pls
version" : "nvc-v1.1.1.build-g32a928e-bdb-gcc",
"protocolversion" : 70018,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"unspendable" : 0.00000000,
"newmint" : 0.00000000,
"stake" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 21057,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"moneysupply" : 1258219.89093600,
"connections" : 1,
"proxy" : "",
"ip" : "192.52.166.80",
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 0.00263536,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.03124954
},
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1438068987,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00010000,
"mininput" : 0.00010000,
"errors" : ""
root@chainserv:/usr/coin/EiniaOraNewSourceCode/src# ./EiniaOraCoind -daemon -rpcuser=x -rpcpassword=x -rpcallowip=10.0.1.* -rpcport=8736 -datadir=datadir getmininginfo
{
"blocks" : 21057,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 0.00263536,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.03124954,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 1000000,
"netmhashps" : 0.00117585,
"netstakeweight" : 715099.32003838,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeinputs" : 0,
"stakeinterest" : 3650000,
"testnet" : false
}
Jump to: