Seems to me that a leader should both represent and appear to represent all of the people and not just people who agree with him or are the same age as him. Probably part of the reason that Bukele has high approval ratings in the arena of 92% is because there is largely a perception that he is trying to represent everyone.. even while he is taking steps to lock up a lot of people, so surely he would not necessarily be representing the interest of those people, even though he likely has responsibilities that he is not unduly locking up innocent people and that there are due process mechanisms in place in order to make sure that innocent people are not getting punished.. .which is frequently a risk when drag-net type operations are carried out...and don't get me wrong, I don't have enough information to conclude that appropriate balances have not been accomplished and ongoingly being worked out in regards to what some folks consider to be draconian measures to achieve better senses of public safety.
I don't get it clearly what you mean by Bukele trying to segregate some segment of the entire El Salvador citizens in some area as regards some financial inclusions but then I also have to forced myself to align myself with your level of conception to be able to assume what you mean by that and in my assumption I believe that you are talking in regards the El Salvador government collaboration with centralized exchange Binance to provide exchange service to the El Salvadorian citizens.
But to what limit that collaboration will hinder the success and freedom that Bitcoin represent to the citizens, but all the way the president as the authority pf the land has to spearhead the promotion and proper arrangement that will give all the citizens an alternative to the highly inflated fiat currency system, offering them the decentralized freedom that come in-between.
I might have had gotten a bit into scrambled arguments, yet I suppose that I was trying to say that any governmental leader, whether Bukele or any other leader has duties to represent everyone, not just people from their demographics, since synchronym's post seemed to be suggesting some kind of an age-bias that Bukele would have had to appeal to young people blah blah blah.. so I was also suggesting that Bukele's high level of support likely shows that tend to believe that he's representing everyone..
and then I got into the prisoner situation.. which probably convoluted some of what I was saying.. so maybe I was trying to say too much and it's not even seeming to be completely that central to the overall theme of this thread in terms of the ramifications of making bitcoin legal tender.. even though the topics do somewhat relate.
In that particular post, I was not even trying to get into anything related to the Binance situation, but I don't mind saying something about the Binance situation, which is that I think that various kinds of relationships are likely needed to be made in terms of which services are made available in the country, and surely any bitcoin related service operating in the country would need to follow the laws of that country.. so I am not sure why people are getting into such a huff about whether it is a good idea for Bukele to agree to Binance coming into the country and receiving certain kinds of licenses to operate there, which may well include trading shitcoins... El Salvador might not be into shitcoins (which it seems that it is not), but on the face of it, the mere fact that Binance allows for shitcoin trading seems like a pretty big "so what?" to me..