To proclaim that even though bitcoin has come into the El Salvador space, Salvadoreans are going on with their lives and choosing dollars and they are not using the bitcoin services or getting involved in bitcoin... which seems to be a questionable assertion to suggest that a government's announcement and actions to liberalize abilities to use bitcoin is not resulting in any kind of significant/meaningful increased bitcoin usage.
El Salvador is a wrong country for bitcoin adoption.
Ok. Fair enough. But it is already happening, whether you believe it to be right or wrong.
El Salvador took a stance more than 2 years ago to make an announcement and pass legislation that it was going to implement a bitcoin as legal tender law starting in September 7, 2021... so we are coming upon 2 years that it has already been implemented and the ongoing experiment of bitcoin in the country has not been subsiding but continuing to be ever-present in the country..
This country isn't high-tech country, developed country, instead, it's a developing one with one of the highest crime and murder rate and violence where the highest percentage of population is poor and the whole country is a nest of nepotism and corruption.
Even if true, none of that has yet stopped bitcoin to continue to grow in El Salvador in the past 2-ish years.
They seem to be quite a good model, at least so far, and they do not seem to be getting too distracted by shitcoins, at least so far, and the traditional financial and governmental naysayers have so far not been able to stop them or to quell them.
You can't move this country into Bitcoin ecosystem.
It is already in it.
I've read that every business is just forced to accept Bitcoin payments whether they want it or not.
That sounds like misinformation, and you seem to believe it? What purpose is that information serving you?
Do you mind sharing some sources for the information and making some arguments in the direction of how "having to" accept bitcoin payments would be any kind of injustice, even if true? Could you describe which merchants might be required to accept bitcoin?
I think legal tender can have some of those kinds of implications of having to accept... but there are devils in details regarding how any particular country might implement its laws.. Do you have details about implementation?
Does having to accept mean that they have to hold BTC? You dumb twat.
That information is likely 2 years old, and right from the start we know that there are ways to convert bitcoin to dollars nearly instantaneously and likely without even many fees.. and even if there were fees could the merchant charge to cover the fees? if the conversion is what the merchant (recipient) wants to do, and if they have not figured out how to set up their system in order to accept bitcoin and to convert to dollars right away.. if that is what they want to do, then where is the injustice? How are injustices being caused? Probably details are important in these kinds of seemingly lame assertions, no?
Bitcoin is not the easiest thing to use.
That's probably true, but a whole country promoting bitcoin and allowing for it likely incentivizes easier ways to figure out how to use it, no?
If there was an attempt of massive Bitcoin adoption in countries like South Korea, Singapore, Japan, Netherlands,
You seem to be describing what you would wish to happen rather than what is actually happening. Sure those other countries may or may not adopt bitcoin.. but no other country has gone to such lengths as El Salvador, at least so far, in terms of going forward with both passing bitcoin legal tender laws, implementing them and having about 2 years of having them in practice .. which ongoingly is likely giving them more information to attempt to figure out if there might be implementation matters that they might need to tweak along the journey.
Bukele's plan of moving on Bitcoin ecosystem could succeed but in El Salvador, it's not going to happen in near future.
It seems to already be succeeding and/or on the bitcoin ecosystem, so your definition of what is success or on the bitcoin ecosystem seems to largely be argumentative... and I suppose you are trying to make some kind of argument that whatever El Salvador is doing is not enough and there bitcoin efforts are having little to no actual meaningful/substantial effects on bitcoin and/or on the material well being of El Salvadorians, and it seems to me that you are largely just trying to impose standards in regards to what you believe would either be successful and/or making a significant of enough of an impact. .which just seems like you are being disingenuous, self-serving and just spinning bullshit out of touch nonsense.